PF-06651600 Placebo
Drug12 weeks, followed by PF-06651600, 50 mg once daily (QD) for 52 weeks
NCT Number: NCT03395184
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06651600 (200 mg for 8 weeks followed by 50 mg for 4 weeks) dosed once daily and PF-06700841 (60 mg for 12 weeks) dosed once daily during an induction period of 12 weeks, followed by an open label extension period at doses of 50 mg and 30 mg of PF 06651600 and PF 06700841, respectively, for 52 weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
•Steroids; Immunosuppressants (azathioprine [AZA], 6 MP, or methotrexate [MTX]); Anti TNF inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab,certolizumab); Anti integrin inhibitors (eg, vedolizumab); Anti IL 12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab).
Exclusion criteria
12 weeks, followed by PF-06651600, 50 mg once daily (QD) for 52 weeks
200 mg QD for 8 weeks, followed by 50 mg QD up to 56 weeks
12 weeks, followed by PF-06700841, 30 mg QD for 52 weeks
60 mg QD for 12 weeks followed by 30 mg QD for up to 52 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
SES CD50 was defined as 50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD. Baseline was defined as last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right colon(C), transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 centimeter[cm]), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Pre-specified criteria for lab abnormalities included- hematology: hemoglobin(Hb), erythrocytes (ery),hematocrit:<0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN);reticulocytes: <0.5*LLN, >1.5*upper limit of normal(ULN); ery mean corpuscular(EMC) volume: <0.9*ULN, >1.11*ULN;EMC Hb: <0.9*LLN; platelets:>1.75*ULN; leukocytes(10^9/L): <0.6*LLN,>1.5*ULN;lymphocyte,neutrophil(10^9/L):<0.8*LLN,>1.2*ULN;basophil,eosinophil,monocyte(10^9/L):>1.2*ULN;activated partial thromboplastin time (sec): >1.1*ULN. Chemistry: bilirubin(mg/dL),aspartate aminotransferase(AT),alanine AT(units per litre)>3.0*ULN; protein, albumin(g/dL):<0.8*LLN; creatinine, triglycerides (mg/dL):>1.3*ULN; urate(mg/dL):>1.2*ULN, potassium (mEq/L):<0.9*LLN; calcium (mg/dL): <0.9*LLN,>1.1*ULN. Urinalysis: pH>8;urine,glucose,protein(mg/dl); ketones, nitrite, urine Hb(scalar):>=1. Number of participants with any lab abnormality meeting pre-specified criteria are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Vital signs including blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure [DBP], systolic blood pressure [SBP], and pulse rate [PR]) were measured in a supine position using automated devices. DBP included value < 50 (millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), change >=20 (mmHg) increase and change >=20 (mmHg) decrease; SBP: value < 90 (mmHg), change >= 30 (mmHg) increase and change >= 30 (mmHg) decrease; PR: value > 120 (beats per minute [bpm]).
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
Single twelve lead ECGs were obtained using an automated ECG machine after participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. QTc prolongations were defined as a QTc >=480 milli second (msec) or an absolute change in QTc greater than (>) 60 msec. Clinically significant ECG findings were determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered TEAE to a given treatment if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions) or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered an important medical event. An SAE was considered as TESAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention in OLE period up to 4 weeks after last dose of study intervention (up to 56 weeks)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study but action taken with study treatment was not drug withdrawn. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. In this outcome measure number of participants with discontinuation from study due to AEs and permanent discontinuation from study intervention due to AEs are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Pre-specified criteria for lab abnormalities included- hematology: hemoglobin, erythrocytes, hematocrit:<0.8*LLN; reticulocytes: <0.5*LLN, >1.5*ULN; EMC volume: <0.9*ULN, >1.11*ULN;EMC Hb: <0.9*LLN; platelets:>1.75*ULN; leukocytes(10^9/L): <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; lymphocyte, neutrophil(10^9/L):<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; basophil, eosinophil, monocyte(10^9/L):>1.2*ULN; activated partial thromboplastin time (sec): >1.1*ULN. Chemistry: bilirubin(mg/dL),aspartate aminotransferase(AT),alanine AT(units per litre)>3.0*ULN; protein, albumin(g/dL):<0.8*LLN; creatinine, triglycerides (mg/dL):>1.3*ULN; urate(mg/dL):>1.2*ULN, potassium (mEq/L):<0.9*LLN; calcium (mg/dL): <0.9*LLN,>1.1*ULN. Urinalysis: pH>8; urine, glucose, protein(mg/dl); ketones, nitrite, urine Hb(scalar):>=1. Number of participants with any lab abnormality meeting pre-specified criteria are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Vital signs including blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure [DBP], systolic blood pressure [SBP], and pulse rate [PR]) were measured in a supine position using automated devices. DBP included value < 50 (mmHg), change >=20 (mmHg) increase and change >=20 (mmHg) decrease; SBP: value < 90 (mmHg), change >= 30 (mmHg) increase and PR: value > 120 (bpm).
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Single twelve lead ECGs were obtained using an automated ECG machine after participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. QTc prolongations were defined as a QTc greater than or equal to (>=)480 milli second (msec) or an absolute change in QTc greater than (>)60 msec. Clinically significant ECG findings were determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An AE was considered TEAE to a given treatment if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions) or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered an important medical event. An SAE was considered as TESAE if the event started during the effective duration of treatment regardless of whether a similar event of equal or greater severity existed in the baseline period.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a study intervention; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study but action taken with study treatment was not drug withdrawn. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs were defined as participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn. In this outcome measure number of participants with discontinuation from study due to AEs and permanent discontinuation from study intervention due to AEs are reported.
Time frame: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to Week 12
Participants were monitored for development of any infection (viral, bacterial and fungal). Serious infections were treated infections that required parenteral antimicrobial therapy and were present with positive pre-treatment culture and required hospitalization for treatment/met other criteria that required the infection to be classified as SAE. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity/results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treated infections were infections that required antimicrobial therapy by any route of administration/required any surgical intervention (e.g., incision and drainage).
Time frame: Week 12
CMEI was defined as reduction of >=3 points from baseline in SES-CD score as assessed by centrally read SES-CD score. Baseline: last measurement prior to first dosing on Day1. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for 4 domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on scale of 0-3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none,1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5cm),2=Large ulcer(0.5-2cm),3=very large ulcer(>2cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none,1=<10%,2=10-30% and 3=>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean change from baseline in SES-CD score at Week 12 analyzed using analysis of covariance(ANCOVA)model with treatment,baseline disease activity/extent as factors, baseline SES CD score as covariate. Baseline=last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1. Following bowel segments used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum,right C,transverse C,left C,rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains:presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface,presence of narrowing, each score on a scale of 0-3,higher scores=more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score:0=none,1=small ulcer:(0.1-0.5cm),2=large ulcer(0.5-2cm),3=very large ulcer(>2 cm);ulcerated surface score:0=none,1=<10%,2=10-30%,3=>30%;affected surface score:0=unaffected segment,1=<50%, 2=50-75%,3=>75%;presence of narrowing score:0=none,1=single,can be passed,2=multiple can be passed,3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score=sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments,range from 0 to 60,higher score =more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 12
SES CD25 was defined as >=25% improvement from baseline in SES CD. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 centimeter[cm]), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 12
Endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD score of <= 2. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right colon(C), transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 centimeter[cm]), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 12
Mucosal healing was defined as complete absence of ulcers.
Time frame: Week 64 (Week 52 of OLE period)
CMEI was defined as reduction of >=3 points from baseline as assessed by centrally read SES CD score. Baseline: last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1 of Week 12. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on scale of 0-3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none,1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 cm),2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm),3=very large ulcer(>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none,1=<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0-60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 64 (Week 52 of OLE period)
SES CD50 and SES CD25: 50% and 25% improvement from baseline, respectively. Baseline: last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1 of Week 12. Following bowel segments were used for calculating SES-CD scores: Ileum, right C, transverse C, left C and rectum. Each segment assessed for four domains: presence of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, higher scores indicated more severe condition. Presence of ulcers score: 0=none, 1=small ulcer: (0.1-0.5 cm), 2=Large ulcer(0.5-2 cm), 3=very large ulcer(>2 cm); ulcerated surface score: 0=none, 1=<10%, 2=10-30% and 3=>30%; affected surface score: 0=unaffected segment, 1=<50%, 2=50-75% and 3=>75%; presence of narrowing score: 0=none,1=single, can be passed, 2=multiple, can be passed and 3=cannot be passed. Total SES CD score was determined by sum of each domain score for all 5 bowel segments and ranged from 0 to 60, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Pfizer
Industry
A PHASE 2A, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORAL PF-06651600 AND PF-06700841 AS INDUCTION AND OPEN LABEL EXTENSION TREATMENT IN SUBJECTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE CROHN'S DISEASE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03000101
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07697547
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT01155362
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04002180
Crohn Disease, Crohn's Disease
Tokyo, Japan
View Trial Details