Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00666835

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HX575 Hexal AG vs ERYPO® for the Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients

This is a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, equivalence study involving about 462 clinically stable hemodialysis patients aged 18 years or above suffering from anemia and treated previously with a stable dose of ERYPO® intravenously.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The primary objective of this Phase III study is the evaluation of therapeutic equivalence of HX575 Hexal AG and a comparator of epoetin alfa, ERYPO® in the maintenance intravenous treatment of renal anemia. Efficacy, dosage and safety of HX575 Hexal AG in the long-term treatment were assessed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving dialysis for at least 6 months (3 times weekly) before screening
  • Age: >=18
  • Clinically stable, i.e. hemoglobin within the established range (10.0 to 13.0 g/dl) for at least 12 weeks before screening
  • Stable intravenous dosage of ERYPO® three times weekly for at least 8 weeks before screening and during screening with a maximal weekly dosage of 300 IU/kg body weight (stable is defined as <25% change (up or down) in weekly dose and no change in frequency over 8 weeks prior screening and 10 weeks prior randomisation)
  • Baseline hemoglobin concentration of 10.0 to 13.0 g/dl (mean of two pre-randomization pre-dialysis samples of Hb at visit -2 and visit 1)
  • Serum ferritin >=100 µg/l and/or saturated transferrin levels >=20%
  • C-reactive protein <15 mg/l (< 5 mg/l: normal; >= 5 mg/l < 10 mg/l: +; >=10mg/l < 100 mg/l: ++; >=100 mg/l: +++)
  • Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits
  • Written informed consent of the patient

Exclusion criteria

  • Anemia of non-renal causes
  • Primary hematologic disorder (e.g. myelodysplastic syndrome, sickle cell anemia, hematological malignancy, hemolytic anemia)
  • Evidence of severe hepatic dysfunction (ALT and/or AST above 2 x upper limit of normal range; or gamma-GT above 3 x upper limit of normal range)
  • Clinical evidence of current uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism (serum parathyroid hormone >1500 pg/mL).
  • Known history of bone marrow disease
  • Any red blood cell transfusion(s) during the last 12 weeks before screening or during the screening/baseline period
  • Insufficient concomitant iron treatment during the last 2 months before Visit -2
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as a predialysis diastolic blood pressure measurement >=110 mmHg during the screening period
  • Congestive heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV]
  • Unstable angina pectoris, active cardiac disease, cardiac infarction during the last six months before screening
  • History of blood coagulation disease
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100.000/µl)
  • Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 2.000/µl)
  • Overt bleeding (acute or chronic bleeding within 2 months of inclusion) or hemolysis
  • Evidence of acute infectious disease or serious active inflammatory states within one months before screening (Visit -2) or during the screening/baseline period
  • Suspicion or known PRCA (pure red cell aplasia)
  • Previously diagnosed HIV or acute hepatitis infection
  • Treatment for epilepsy within the past 6 months
  • Planned surgery during the next 7 months (except vascular access surgery)
  • Any androgen therapy within 2 months before visit -2 and during the study
  • Therapy with immunosuppressants or any drug known to affect the hematocrit within 1 month before Visit -2 and during the study
  • Clinical evidence of malignant diseases
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding women or women not using adequate birth control measures
  • Known history of severe drug related allergies
  • Known allergy to one of the ingredients of the test or reference products or hypersensitivity to mammalian-derived products
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or participation in a study in the month preceding the start of this study or previously randomized in this study
  • Participation in an erythropoietin study in the 3 months preceding screening (visit -2)
  • Any other condition which at the investigator´s discretion may put the patient at risk or which may confound the study results

Treatment and study plan

HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG

Drug

HX575 Solution for i.v. injection Containing 1000, 2000 and 4000 IU of rh erythropoietin

Other names: Binocrit, Abseamed

ERYPO®, Janssen-Cilag

Drug

Solution for i.v. injection

Other names: EPREX®, Solution for i.v. injection

Primary outcomes

  1. To Compare the Efficacy of HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag.

    Time frame: 28 weeks

    Primary endpoint was the mean absolute change in Hb level between the screening/baseline and the evaluation period. A two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the difference in mean change (mean of evaluation period - mean of screening/baseline period) in Hb between epoetin alfa HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag was computed. The difference was estimated from an analysis of a co-variance model including factors treatment, center, mean baseline Hb (<11.5 and ≥11.5 g/dL) as factors and change of the mean weekly dose from screening/baseline to the evaluation period (of HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG or ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag) as a covariate. HX575 Hexal AG was considered at least as good as ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag if the 95 % confidence interval of the difference in mean changes in Hb levels between HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag lied entirely within the interval [-0.5 g/dL; 0.5 g/dL]. Primary Endpoint was analyzed based on intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Absolute Change in Hemoglobin Level From the Screening/Baseline Period to the Evaluation Period - ITT Population

    Time frame: 28 weeks

    The mean absolute change in Hb levels between the screening/baseline period and the evaluation period was analyzed for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population in the same way as the primary efficacy endpoint. A two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the difference in mean change (mean of evaluation period - mean of screening/baseline period) in Hb between HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag was computed. The difference was estimated from an analysis of a co-variance model including factors treatment, center, mean baseline Hb (<11.5 and ≥11.5 g/dL) as factors and change of the mean weekly dose from screening/baseline to the evaluation period (of HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG or ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag) as a covariate. HX575 Hexal AG was considered at least as good as ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag if the 95 % confidence interval of the difference in mean changes in Hb levels between HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag lied entirely within the interval [-0.5 g/dL; 0.5 g/dL].

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sandoz

Industry

Collaborators

  • Hexal AG

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Equivalence Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HX575 Hexal AG vs ERYPO® for the Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2006
First posted
Apr 25, 2008
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.