bevacizumab [Avastin]
DrugIntravenous repeating dose
NCT Number: NCT01663727
This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab administered in combination with paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated, locally recurrent, or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: bevacizumab or placebo. All patients will be given an intravenous (IV) infusion of of paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) for 3 weeks during each 28-day cycle. bevacizumab or placebo (10 mg/kg) will be administered by IV infusion on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death from any cause occurs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Disease-Specific Exclusions:
General Medical Exclusions:
Intravenous repeating dose
Intravenous repeating dose
Intravenous repeating dose
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression, death or clinical cut-off (up to 117.7 weeks)
Tumor assessment was performed as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by investigator. Disease progression was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm), unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression, death or clinical cut-off (up to 117.7 weeks)
PFS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the first documentation of progressive disease or death from any cause. Tumor assessment was performed as per RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Disease progression was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression, death or clinical cut-off (up to 111.3 weeks)
Tumor assessment was performed as per RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Disease progression was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression, death or clinical cut-off (up to 111.3 weeks)
PFS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the first documentation of progressive disease or death from any cause. Tumor assessment was performed as per RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Disease progression was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization till death or clinical cut-off (up to 244 weeks)
Time frame: From randomization till death or clinical cut-off (up to 244 weeks)
OS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization till death or clinical cut-off (up to 244 weeks)
Time frame: From randomization till death or clinical cut-off (up to 244 weeks)
OS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression, death or clinical cut-off (up to 117.7 weeks)
Objective response was defined as having a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) according to a RECIST criteria v 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Measurable disease was defined by the presence of at least one measurable lesion by clinical measurement, chest x-ray, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression, death or clinical cut-off (up to 111.3 weeks)
Objective response was defined as having a CR or PR according to a RECIST criteria v 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Measurable disease was defined by the presence of at least one measurable lesion by clinical measurement, chest x-ray, CT, or MRI.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression or clinical cut-off (up to 117.7 weeks)
Duration of response was defined as the time from the initial date of the objective response to documented disease progression or death (whichever occurred first). Objective response was defined as having a CR or PR according to a RECIST criteria v 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Disease progression was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks until documented disease progression or clinical cut-off (up to 111.3 weeks)
Duration of response was defined as the time from the initial date of the objective response to documented disease progression or death (whichever occurred first). Objective response was defined as having a CR or PR according to a RECIST criteria v 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Disease progression was defined at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Of Bevacizumab, and Associated Biomarkers, In Combination With Paclitaxel Compared With Paclitaxel Plus Placebo as First-line Treatment Of Patients With Her2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07693985
Adherence Interventions, Behavior
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06386263
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05043506
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Braunau am Inn, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT03323346
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasm Female
Olomouc, Czechia
View Trial Details