rintatolimod
Drug100 to 400 mg twice weekly
Other names: Ampligen, poly I : poly C12U, Rintatolimod (poly I : poly C12U)
NCT Number: NCT05592418
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Ampligen® administered twice weekly by intravenous (IV) infusions in subjects experiencing the Post-COVID Condition of fatigue.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Hope Clinical Research, Canoga Park, California, United States
This is a Phase 2, two-arm, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ampligen® in patients experiencing the Post-COVID Condition of fatigue. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive twice weekly IV infusions of Ampligen® or placebo.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Note: For subjects with COVID-19 symptoms who were not tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2, a positive serum antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 will be sufficient in subjects not vaccinated for COVID-19 or it can be shown that the positive antibody cannot be associated with the COVID-19 vaccination.
Note: Below are the examples of clinically significant ECG abnormalities:
Exclusion criteria
100 to 400 mg twice weekly
Other names: Ampligen, poly I : poly C12U, Rintatolimod (poly I : poly C12U)
40 to 160 mL twice weekly
Time frame: Baseline and Week 13
Change in mean fatigue T-score as measured by PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue short form 7a that assess a range of self-reported symptoms, from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to extreme exhaustion. The lowest possible raw score is 7; the highest possible raw score is 35. Raw summed scores are converted to T-score values that are standardized such that 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, with a standard deviation of 10 points. The lowest possible T-score is 29.4; the highest possible T-score is 83.2. A higher T-score represents more of the concept being measured, meaning the higher the T-Score, the worse the fatigue of the individual. Scores <55 are within normal limits, 55-60 mild, 61-70 moderate, and >70 severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6
Change in mean fatigue T-score as measured by PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue short form 7a that assess a range of self-reported symptoms, from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to extreme exhaustion. The lowest possible raw score is 7; the highest possible raw score is 35. Raw summed scores are converted to T-score values that are standardized such that 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, with a standard deviation of 10 points. The lowest possible T-score is 29.4; the highest possible T-score is 83.2. A higher T-score represents more of the concept being measured, meaning the higher the T-Score, the worse the fatigue of the individual. Scores <55 are within normal limits, 55-60 mild, 61-70 moderate, and >70 severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6 and 13
Change in mean fatigue T-score as measured by PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue short form 7a that assess a range of self-reported symptoms, from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to extreme exhaustion. For this endpoint, the last question of "How often did you have enough energy to exercise strenuously" was excluded. Therefore, the lowest possible raw score is 6; the highest possible raw score is 30. Raw summed scores are converted to T-score values that are standardized such that 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, with a standard deviation of 10 points. The lowest possible T-score is 33.4; the highest possible T-score is 76.8. A higher T-score represents more of the concept being measured, meaning the higher the T-Score, the worse the fatigue of the individual.
Time frame: Baseline to week 6 and week 13
The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. The 6MWT is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance.
Time frame: End of 12 week treatment phase
Percentage of subjects with increase of at least 54 m from baseline in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at the end of 12-week treatment phase presented and summarized descriptively by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6 and 13
Change in mean cognitive function T-score as measured by PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Cognitive Function - Abilities short form 8a that assesses self-perceived cognitive deficits. The lowest possible raw score is 8; the highest possible raw score is 40. Raw summed scores are converted to T-score values that are standardized such that 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, with a standard deviation of 10 points. The lowest possible T-score is 23.27; the highest possible T-score is 67.09. A higher T-score represents more of the concept being measured, meaning the higher the T-Score, the better the cognitive function of the individual. Scores >45 are within normal limits, 40-45 mild, 30-40 moderate, and <30 severe cognitive dysfunction.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6 and 13
Change in mean sleep disturbance T-score as measured by PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Sleep Disturbance - short form 4a that assesses self-perceived sleep quality. The lowest possible raw score is 4; the highest possible raw score is 20. Raw summed scores are converted to T-score values that are standardized such that 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, with a standard deviation of 10 points. The lowest possible T-score is 32; the highest possible T-score is 73.3. A higher T-score represents more of the concept being measured, meaning the higher the T-Score, the worse the sleep disturbance of the individual. Scores <55 are within normal limits, 55-60 mild, 61-70 moderate, and >70 severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline and the end of treatment phase at week 12
The SBQ-LC (Symptom Burden Questionnaire for Long COVID), which includes questions related to common COVID-19 symptoms, was assessed at baseline and at every odd-numbered visit from Visit 3 to Visit 25.
Data at baseline and change from baseline at Week 12 (end of treatment) is reported.
The converted scores reported for each symptom range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating worse symptom burden.
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 13 during treatment phase
The change from baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at week 4, 8, and 13 is presented and summarized descriptively by treatment group. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function; total scores equal to or higher than 26 are considered normal.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment range is from 0-30, with a score of 26 or higher indicating normal cognitive function. 18-25 indicates mild cognitive impairment; 10-17 indicates moderate cognitive impairment; less than 10 indicates severe cognitive impairment.
Time frame: During the treatment phase up to 12 weeks
Number of subjects with hospitalization during treatment phase up to week 12.
Time frame: During the treatment phase up to 12 weeks
Duration (days) of hospitalization during the treatment phase up to week 12.
Time frame: Baseline to week 6 and 13
A blood sample was collected at V2 (pre-dose), V12 (pre-dose), and V26 (Follow-up 1) for research purposes to conduct exploratory analyses of lymphocyte profile by flow cytometry. The absolute values and change from baseline data for CD3+ were evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline to week 6 and 13
A blood sample was collected at V2 (pre-dose), V12 (pre-dose), and V26 (Follow-up 1) for research purposes to conduct exploratory analyses of lymphocyte profile by flow cytometry. The absolute values and change from baseline data for CD3-CD56+ natural killers (NK+) were evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline to week 6 and 13
A blood sample was collected at V2 (pre-dose), V12 (pre-dose), and V26 (Follow-up 1) for research purposes to conduct exploratory analyses of lymphocyte profile by flow cytometry. The absolute values and change from baseline data for CD4:CD8 ratio were evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline and week 13
A blood sample was collected at V2 (pre-dose) and V26 (Follow-up 1) for research purposes to conduct exploratory analyses of protein biomarkers.
AIM ImmunoTech Inc.
Industry
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ampligen® in Patients With Post-COVID Conditions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05890534
COVID-19, Chronic Disease
Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05240742
COVID-19, Chronic Disease
Maastricht, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05682560
COVID-19, Chronic Disease
Miami Lakes, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05638620
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Basal Ganglia Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial Details