Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02741310

Study to Evaluate the Effect of Erenumab on Blood Pressure When Given Concomitantly With Subcutaneous Sumatriptan

The primary objective of this study was to assess the effects of subcutaneous sumatriptan alone and the effects of a single dose of erenumab (AMG 334) intravenous (IV) and sumatriptan concomitant therapy on resting blood pressure in healthy adults.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

Research Site

Leuven, 3000, Belgium

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy male and female subjects ≥ 18 to ≤ 55 years old
  • Good general health
  • Laboratory results within range
  • Other Inclusion Criteria May Apply

Exclusion criteria

  • Female subjects pregnant or breastfeeding
  • An unstable medical condition
  • History of cancer
  • Active liver disease
  • Positive Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C
  • Unwilling or unable to limit alcohol consumption
  • Unable to refrain from strenuous exercise
  • Other Exclusion Criteria May Apply

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Drug

Administered by intravenous infusion

Sumatriptan

Drug

Administered by two 6 mg subcutaneous injections 1 hour apart on day 2 and day 5

Other names: Imitrex™

Erenumab

Drug

Administered by intravenous infusion

Other names: AMG 334, Aimovig™

Primary outcomes

  1. Time-weighted Averages of Mean Arterial Pressure

    Time frame: Days 2 and 5 from predose to 2.5 hours after sumatriptan dosing.

    Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is the average arterial pressure during a single cardiac cycle. MAP was calculated as diastolic blood pressure (DBP) + 0.33 * (systolic blood pressure [SBP]-DBP). Individual time-weighted average in MAP were calculated as area under the measurement-time curve from predose through 2.5 hours of MAP divided by the time period over which the measurements were made (ie, AUCmap0-2.5 hr /2.5 hours).

    Data were analyzed using a linear mixed effects regression model with fixed effects for treatment and period and random effect for subject; Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (sumatriptan, placebo or erenumab) until 84 days after the last dose (89 days). Part 1 includes AEs from day 1 to predose on day 4 and Part 2 includes AEs from day 4 through day 89.

    Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and according to the following:

    Grade 1 = Mild AE, asymptomatic or mild symptoms; Grade 2 = Moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5 = Death related to AE.

  2. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours for Sumatriptan

    Time frame: Day 2 and day 5 at 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.

    Plasma concentrations of sumatriptan were quantified using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometry detection.

    Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 6 hours post dose (AUC6hr) after the 2nd 6 mg dose of sumatriptan was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ; 0.100 ng/mL) were set to 0 before data analysis.

    Log-transformed AUC6hr was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect.

    Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only).

  3. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity for Sumatriptan

    Time frame: Day 2 and day 5 at 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.

    Plasma concentrations of sumatriptan were quantified using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) after the 2nd 6 mg dose of sumatriptan was estimated as the sum of AUClast and Clast/λz where Clast is the last observed concentration and λz is the first-order terminal rate constant estimated via linear regression of the terminal log-linear decay phase. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.100 ng/mL) were set to 0 before data analysis.

    Log-transformed AUCinf was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect. Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only).

  4. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sumatriptan

    Time frame: Day 2 and day 5 at predose, 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.

    Plasma concentrations of sumatriptan were quantified using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.100 ng/mL) were set to 0 before data analysis.

    Log-transformed maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect. Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only).

  5. Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies

    Time frame: Baseline and day 89

    Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. All samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence-based bridging assay to detect antibodies capable of binding to erenumab (Binding Antibody Assay). Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against erenumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). If a post-dose sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.

    Binding/neutralizing antibody positive is defined as participants with an antibody positive postbaseline results and with a negative or no result at baseline.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Phase 1, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Effect on Blood Pressure of AMG 334 Given Concomitantly With Subcutaneous Sumatriptan (Imitrex™) in Healthy Subjects

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 18, 2016
Registry last updated
Apr 2, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.