Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00828464

Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate for Chronic Hand Dermatitis

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety, efficacy and tolerability of Clobetasol propionate foam in subjects with chronic dermatitis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Physicians Skin Care

Louisville, Kentucky, 40217, United States

About this study

The study is being conducted in order to obtain safety, efficacy and tolerability data for Clobetasol propionate foam in the treatment of chronic dermatitis. The subjects must have mild to moderate disease based on the Investigator's assessment at baseline.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects 18 years of age or older, with diagnosis of chronic dermatitis, able to complete the study and comply with study instructions.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must have been using a medically acceptable form of contraception

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of systemic corticosteroid and/or other prohibited medications within 4 weeks of the baseline visit.
  • Use of topical corticosteroid therapy and/or other prohibited topical medications within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit

Treatment and study plan

Clobetasol propionate

Drug

Clobetasol propionate. The study product will be applied topically twice a day (morning and evening) for 14 days of treatment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Subjects With at Least 1-grade Improvement From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15

    Proportion of Subjects with at least a 1-Grade Improvement from Baseline to Day 15 In Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) - Chronic Hand Dermatitis Please note that the proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    ISGA grades:

    Score = 0 (Clear) Score = 1 (Almost Clear) Score = 2 (Mild) Score = 3 (Moderate) Score = 4 (Severe)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 1-grade Improvement Based on the ISGA at Day 8.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 8

    Please note that the proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) At least 1-grade improvement (%) at Day 8

    ISGA grades:

    Score = 0 (Clear) Score = 1 (Almost Clear) Score = 2 (Mild) Score = 3 (Moderate) Score = 4 (Severe)

  2. Change in Subject's Visual Analogue Assessment Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 8

    Mean change in subject's visual analogue assessment scale from baseline to day 8. At each visit, the subject is requested to rate the changes in their skin on the hands on a 1 to 10 scale with 0 being poor and 10 being excellent.

  3. Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15

    Proportion of subjects at day 15 with at least 1-Grade improvement in the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for all symptoms present at baseline - Finger Tips. The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  4. Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 8

    Proportion of Subjects at day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  5. Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Fingers

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15

    Proportion of Subjects at day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Fingers.

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  6. Proportion of Subjects With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Fingers

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 8

    Proportion of Subjects at day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Fingers

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  7. Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 8

    Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Palm of Hands.

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  8. Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15

    Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least a 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  9. Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 8

    Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands.

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  10. Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15

    Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands.

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  11. Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 8

    Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists.

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  12. Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15

    Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI)for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists.

    The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.

    Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.

  13. Change in Subject's Visual Analogue Assessment Scale From Baseline to Day 15

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15

    Mean change in subject's visual analogue assessment scale from baseline to day 15. At each visit, the subject is requested to rate the changes in their skin on the hands on a 1 to 10 scale with 0 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Stiefel, a GSK Company

Industry

Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Registry information

Official study title

An Open Label Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate for the Condition of Chronic Hand Dermatitis

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jan 26, 2009
Registry last updated
Oct 3, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.