Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States
NCT Number: NCT02991040
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra + (with Lidocaine) versus Revanesse® Ultra for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Revanesse® Ultra + (with lidocaine, hereafter referred to as Revanesse Ultra +) to Revanesse Ultra for subjects undergoing correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States
This is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, split-face study in subjects seeking nasolabial fold correction. Subjects will be treated with Revanesse Ultra + in the NLF on one side of the face and Revanesse Ultra in the NLF on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each study product will be randomly assigned. The investigator and the subject will be blinded to the treatment; injections of the study product will be performed by an unblinded injecting investigator.
At each visit, investigator and subject evaluations of the treated areas will be performed and recorded
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
Bilateral nasolabial fold trial to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Revanesse® Ultra + (with lidocaine) to Revanesse® Ultra (comparator)
Other names: Revanesse Versa+
Comparator without lidocaine
Other names: Revanesse Versa
Time frame: at injection Time 0
Visual Analog Scale for Pain. A 100 mm scale with 0 mm being no pain (best outcome) to 100 mm being worst pain (worst outcome). The higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post injection and at 2 weeks post injection
Visual Analog Scale for pain. A 100 mm scale with 0 mm being no pain (best outcome) to 100 mm being worst pain (worst outcome). The higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)
The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a 5-point scale with 1 = Absent; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe and 5 = Extreme. 1 is the best outcome while 5 is the worst outcome. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)
Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement Score is a 5-point scale used to assess the subject's satisfaction with the visual appearance of their NLF correction after treatment. 1 = Worse (worst outcome), 2 = No Change, 3 = Improved, 4 = Much Improved, 5 = Very Much improved (best outcome). The higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)
Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Score is a 5-point scale with 1 = Worse (worst outcome); 2 = No Change; 3 = Improved; 4 = Much Improved, 5 = Very much improved (best outcome). The higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: at injection, Visit 2/Day 14 (± 2 days), Visit 3/Day 28 (± 2 days), Visit 4/Day 84 (± 4 days), Visit 5/Day 168 (Week 24) (± 7 days)
study products will be compared by evaluating the nature, severity, and frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Prollenium Medical Technologies Inc.
Industry
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra + (With Lidocaine) Versus Revanesse® Ultra for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07102537
Nasolabial Fold Correction
Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran
View Trial DetailsNCT04971876
Lips Enhancement, Midface Volume Deficit
Darmstadt, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02987205
Nasolabial Fold Correction
View Trial DetailsNCT02984878
Nasolabial Fold Correction
View Trial Details