Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05635838

Study to Evaluate of the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib cream in participants with Hidradenitis Suppurativa. This is a randomized 16-week double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) study followed by a 16 week open label extension period (OLE) with an active treatment for participants who complete the DBVC period.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of HS based on clinical history and physical examination for at least 3 months.
  • Diagnosis of HS (Hurley I or II) with the following:
  • A total AN count of 3 to ≤ 10, with no draining tunnels at screening and baseline visits. AND
  • The AN count at the screening AND baseline visits:
  • AN of 3 should affect at least 1 distinct anatomical area
  • AN of > 3 to ≤ 10 should affect at least 2 distinct anatomical areas.
  • Baseline Skin Pain or Itch NRS score ≥ 1.
  • Agreement to NOT use topical and systemic antibiotics for treatment of HS during the study.
  • Agreement to NOT use a diluted beach bath or topical antiseptic washes containing chlorhexidine gluconate or benzoyl peroxide on the areas affected by HS lesions during the study.
  • Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of draining tunnels at screening or at baseline visits.
  • Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases:
  • Active ongoing inflammatory diseases of the skin other than HS that might confound the evaluation of HS.
  • Any other concomitant skin disorder (eg, generalized erythroderma such as Netherton's syndrome), pigmentation, or extensive scarring that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the evaluation of HS AN or compromise participant safety.
  • Immunocompromised (eg, lymphoma, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome).
  • Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before baseline.
  • Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection (eg, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, chicken pox, clinically infected AD, or impetigo) within 2 weeks before baseline.
  • Laboratory values outside of the protocol-defined criteria.
  • Use of any prohibited medications per protocol-defined criteria.
  • Pregnant or lactating participants, or those considering pregnancy during the period of their study participation.
  • Other exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Ruxolitinib Cream

Drug

Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.

Other names: INCB018424 cream

Vehicle cream

Drug

Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

    The mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

    AN50, AN75, AN90, and AN100 were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% decrease, respectively, in AN count relative to Baseline.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Total AN Count in Anatomical Areas With Pre-existing ANs at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

    Pre-existing ANs at Baseline were defined as abscesses and/or inflammatory nodules present at Baseline. All new ANs identified during the study in an anatomical area that had pre-existing ANs at Baseline were counted. Any new ANs identified in an anatomical area that was initially free of ANs at Baseline were not counted. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.

  3. Change From Baseline in Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

    The Skin Pain NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of skin pain related to Hidradenitis Suppurativa. The participants rated the pain severity of their Hidradenitis Suppurativa by selecting a number from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) that best described their worst level of pain in the past 24 hours. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.

  4. Change From Baseline in Itch NRS Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

    The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity related to Hidradenitis Suppurativa. The participants rated the itch severity of their Hidradenitis Suppurativa by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

    HiSCR was defined as at least a 50% reduction in AN count with no increase in either abscess or draining fistula counts, relative to Baseline.

  6. Change From Baseline in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

    The IHS4 is a composite, dynamic score and validated tool used to determine Hidradenitis Suppurativa severity. IHS4 score was calculated by the number of inflammatory nodules (multiplied by 1) plus the number of abscesses (multiplied by 2) plus the number of draining tunnels (multiplied by 4). Scores: mild=0-3; moderate=4-10; severe ≥11. The MMRM included the fixed effects of the treatment group (ruxolitinib 1.5% and vehicle cream), stratification factor (Baseline AN count of ≥3 to 4 or ≥5 to 10), visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Baseline value.

  7. Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE ) in the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled (DBVC) Period

    Time frame: up to Week 16 plus 30 days

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

  8. Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE in the DBVC Period

    Time frame: up to Week 16 plus 30 days

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.

  9. Number of Participants With Any TEAE in the Open-label Extension (OLE) Period

    Time frame: from Week 17 up to Week 32 plus 30 days

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

  10. Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE in the OLE Period

    Time frame: from Week 17 up to Week 32 plus 30 days

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. A TEAE was defined as any AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Incyte Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy, and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 2, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 1, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.