ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™
DeviceASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Profile implants: Ø4.5, 5.0, 5.0S mm in lengths of 9, 11, 13, 15mm.
NCT Number: NCT00807456
The study aims to evaluate maintenance of lingual/palatinal marginal bone with the (ASTRA TECH Implant System) OsseoSpeed™ Profile implant in sites where the alveolar crest anatomy is sloped in a lingual to buccal direction.
The hypothesis is that the sloped marginal contour of the implant will help preserve the lingual/palatinal marginal bone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Profile implants: Ø4.5, 5.0, 5.0S mm in lengths of 9, 11, 13, 15mm.
Time frame: At baseline and 16 weeks
Clinical measurements after implant installation and after 16 weeks to determine bone levels at the buccal and lingual aspects in relation to a fixed landmark on the implant, i.e. the interface between the micro-threaded part and the shoulder at the marginal portion of the implants.The assessments were made using a periodontal probe and distances were measured to the nearest 0.5 mm. Negative value denotes loss of bone.
Time frame: 21 weeks, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months post implant placement.
The survival rate for individual implants was evaluated at each visit. Any removed implant was considered an implant loss, regardless of reason for removal.
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks, 21 weeks, 12 months, and 36 months post implant placement
MBL alteration assessed by measuring the distance from the implant reference point to the most conical bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal side of the implant. The mean of all values for one subject was calculated and used for analysis.
Time frame: 21 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months post implant placement
BoP was assessed by recording bleeding after probing at the mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal surfaces of the implant site.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months post implant placement
PPD was measured using a regular peridontal probe from the gingival margin to nearest whole millimeter. The average PPD change from permanent restoration is presented on implant level.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months post implant placement
CAL was measure with a probe from the crown margin (the interface between the abutment) to the crown at the mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual aspects of the implant. The average CAL change from permanent restoration is presented on implant level.
Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Industry
A Prospective, Open, Single Arm, Multi-center Study to Evaluate Maintenance of Lingual Bone in Healed Ridges With the ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Profile Implant. A 3-year Follow-up Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07449546
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07373340
Edentulism
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07373548
Dental Implant, Edentulism
Szeged, Csongrád megye, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT07323290
Edentulism, Implant Dentistry
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details