Fasinumab
DrugSolution for injection in pre-filled syringe
Other names: REGN475, MT-5547
NCT Number: NCT03304379
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to placebo, when administered for up to 24 weeks in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip.
The secondary objectives of the study are:
* To evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)s, when administered for up to 24 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip * To assess the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo and compared to NSAIDs, when administered for up to 24 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Pinnacle Research Group, Llc, Anniston, Alabama, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria (additional criteria may apply at screening):
Key Exclusion Criteria (additional criteria may apply at screening):
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
Other names: REGN475, MT-5547
NSAID active comparator (capsule)
Other names: ZORVOLEX
NSAID active comparator (capsule)
Other names: CELEBREX
Fasinumab-matching placebo (solution for injection in pre-filled syringe); NSAID-matching placebo (capsule)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Physical function referred to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index knee during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate more pain.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
The PGA was a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and, 5 =very poor (Very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Physical function referred to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
The PGA was a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and, 5 =very poor (Very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants reported weekly average walking index joint pain based on NRS. The NRS was nationally recognized numeric scale from 0 to 10, where 0 would demonstrate no pain, 1 to 3 would demonstrate mild pain, 4 to 6 would be moderate pain, 7 to 9 would be severe pain and 10 would be the worst pain possible. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
AA was a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive Osteoarthritis (OA) type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
Potential events of SNS dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 44
Any participants with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI).
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of participants who underwent a JR surgery from baseline up to Week 24 were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 44
Number of participants who underwent a JR surgery from baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44) were reported.
Time frame: At Week 72
An EOS phone contact was conducted at Week 72 following the last dose of study drug (Week 24) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.
Time frame: At Weeks 0, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 44
Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses < 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, >= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Industry
Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo And NSAID Controlled Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fasinumab In Patients With Pain Due To Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Or Hip
Acronym: FACT OA2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03737149
Arthritis, Bronchial Diseases
Fremont, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04269239
Arthritis, Dyssomnias
Galveston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05706844
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Hvidovre, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05839262
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Concepción, Chile
View Trial Details