Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03158311

Study to Compare QVM149 and Free Triple Combination of Salmeterol/Fluticasone + Tiotropium

The purpose of this trial was to demonstrate that the efficacy of two treatment arms of the fixed-dose combination product QVM149 was non-inferior to the efficacy of the free combination arm of salmeterol/ fluticasone+ tiotropium in uncontrolled moderate to severe asthmatic patients.

The planned duration of treatment in this study was 24 weeks, followed up by a 7-day follow-up period.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Berazategui, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study used a randomized, partially-blinded, 24-week, parallel-group, non-inferiority, open-label active controlled design. The study was partially open-label. Investigators and patients had knowledge of treatment allocation between QVM149 and/or comparator, however the QVM149 strength allocation was masked. The global sponsor team responsible for data review and analysis was blinded to all treatment allocations The study consisted of a screening period of up to 1-week, run-in period of 2-weeks, randomized treatment period of 24-weeks, and a follow-up period of 1-week.

At the screening visit, informed consent was obtained, and current and prohibited medications were reviewed. Rescue medication was provided to all patients who met the eligibility criteria and was to be used on an "as needed" basis throughout the study.

At the run-in visit, inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed and the patients were supplied with open-label long acting β2-adrenergic agonist/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 μg b.i.d or 50/500 μg b.i.d to match their ICS background medication dose to be stopped at randomization visit.

All patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms with a randomization ratio of 1:1:1. The patients were stratified at randomization according to the ICS dose component of background ICS/LABA (medium or high dose) and region.

Treatment period visits were scheduled every 8 weeks. The study used two doses of QVM149 (high dose [150/50/160 μg] and a medium dose [150/50/80 μg] o.d. delivered via Concept1 inhaler) and a comparator treatment (salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 μg b.i.d. delivered via Accuhaler® plus tiotropium 5 μg o.d delivered via Respimat®).

All randomized patients were contacted (by telephone) 7 days following the last dose of study medication or last visit, whichever was later, for Safety Follow-up visit.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of asthma for a period of at least 6 months prior to Visit 1 with current asthma severity ≥ step 4 (GINA 2017).
  • Patients who had used ICS/LABA combinations for asthma for at least 3 months and at stable medium or high dose of ICS/LABA for at least 1 month prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients were required to be symptomatic at screening despite treatment with medium or high stable doses of ICS/LABA as defined by ACQ-7 score ≥ 1.5 at visits 101 and 201 (randomization visit).
  • Patients with history of at least one severe asthma exacerbation which required medical care from a physician, emergency room visit (or local equivalent structure) or hospitalization in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 and required systemic corticosteroid treatment for at least 3 days including physician guided self-management treatment with oral corticosteroids as part of written asthma action plan.
  • Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of < 85 % of the predicted normal value for the patient after withholding bronchodilators prior to spirometry at both Visit 101 and Visit 201.
  • Patients who demonstrated an increase in FEV1 of ≥ 12% and 200 ml.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who had a smoking history of greater than 20 pack years.
  • Patients diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
  • Patients who had an asthma attack/exacerbation requiring systemic steroids or hospitalization or emergency room visit within 6 weeks of Visit 1 (Screening).
  • Patients treated with a LAMA for asthma within 3 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients who had a respiratory tract infection or clinical significant asthma worsening as defined by Investigator within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or between Visit 1 and Visit 201.

Treatment and study plan

QVM149

Drug

Indacaterol acetate / glycopyrronium bromide / mometasone furoate

Salmeterol/fluticasone plus tiotropium

Drug

Free triple arm of salmeterol / fluticasone plus tiotropium

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    The AQLQ is a 32-item asthma specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma, with a recall time of two weeks and each question to be answered on a 7-point scale, where 1=totally limited/problems all the time and 7= not at all limited/no problems. It consists of 4 domains: symptoms, activity limitation, emotional funtion, and emotional stimuli. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 32 items. Higher AQLQ scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16 and Week 24

    FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. Trough FEV1 is the mean of two FEV1 values measures taken 15 minutes (min) and 45 min prior to evening dose.

  2. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 24

    The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function.

  3. Change From Baseline in AQLQ Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

    The AQLQ is a 32-item asthma specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma, with a recall time of two weeks and each question to be answered on a 7-point scale, where 1=totally limited/problems all the time and 7= not at all limited/no problems. It consists of 4 domains: symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental stimuli. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 32 items. Higher AQLQ scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

  4. Percentage of Patients Achieving the Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Decrease From Baseline ACQ-7 ≥ 0.5

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function. Decrease of ACQ-7 score of at least 0.5 from baseline was considered clinically meaningful.

  5. Percentage of Patients Achieving the Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Change From Baseline AQLQ ≥ 0.5

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    The AQLQ is a 32-item asthma specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma, with a recall time of two weeks and each question to be answered on a 7-point scale, where 1=totally limited/problems all the time and 7= not at all limited/no problems. It consists of 4 domains: symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental stimuli. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 32 items. Higher AQLQ scores indicate better health-related quality of life. An improvement of 0.5 points in AQLQ score is considered to be the minimally clinically important difference in asthma.

  6. Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16 and Week 24

    FVC is the total volume of air exhaled during a expiratory maneuvre. It was assessed by performing a spirometry assessment.

  7. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow Between 25% and 75% of Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25-75)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16 and Week 24

    Forced expiratory flow during the mid (25 - 75%) portion of the FVC. It was assessed by performing spirometric assessment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Partially-Blinded, Randomized, 24-Week, Parallel-Group, Non-Inferiority, Open-Label Active Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of QVM149 With a Free Triple Combination of Salmeterol/Fluticasone + Tiotropium in Patients With Uncontrolled Asthma

Acronym: ARGON

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
May 18, 2017
Registry last updated
Oct 8, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.