NCT Number: NCT00746187
Study to Compare Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants From Two Dental Implant Systems.
The purpose of this study is to compare marginal bone level changes between ASTRA TECH Implant System; Fixture ST and Biomet 3i; Osseotite® Implants. Subjects with partial edentulism in the posterior maxilla and/or mandible will be included and a one-stage surgical protocol will be used. Implants will be loaded within 15 weeks from installation. The subjects will be followed for 3 years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–75 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Dept. of Implant Dentistry, New York University, New York, United States
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Provision of written informed consent
- Age 18 - 75 years
- Partial edentulism, Kennedy class I or II, last natural tooth must be cuspid or first bicuspid
- Edentulous in the area/s if implant placement for more than 2 months
Exclusion criteria
- Untreated caries and/or periodontal disease of residual dentition
- Need for pre-surgical bone or soft tissue augmentation in the planned implant area/s.
- Absence of occlusal stability in centric occlusion
- Any systemic or local disease or condition that would compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
- Systemic corticosteroids or any other medication that would compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration
- Pregnancy
- Present alcohol or drug abuse
- Tobacco smoking during the last 6 months
- Unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits for a period of 3 years
Treatment and study plan
3i Osseotite® implant: Ø 4.0 in lengths of 8.5, 10, 11.5 and 13 mm
DevicePrimary outcomes
-
Marginal Bone Level Changes
Time frame: 3 years after implant placement (baseline)
Marginal bone adaptation was expressed as the distance from the implant reference point to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal side of the implant. Bone adaptation in millimeters at the 3-year follow-up visit were compared to values obtained at Implant placement (baseline). Positive value indicates bone gain and negative value bone loss.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
An Open, Randomized Study to Compare Two Dental Implant Systems With Regard to Changes in Marginal Bone Level.
Important dates
- Study start
- 2002
- Primary completion
- 2011
- Study completion
- 2011
- First posted
- Sep 3, 2008
- Registry last updated
- Apr 13, 2016
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Evaluation of Mandibular Posterior Zirconia Crowns With Different Ti-Base Surface Treatments.
NCT07456995
Dental Implant, Jaw Diseases
Giza, Giza Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsAssessment of Two Filling Materials for Teeth-tissue Supported Overdenture
NCT06580483
Jaw Diseases, Jaw, Edentulous
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsPain Severity in Flapless Dental Implant Placement Using Laser
NCT06294249
Jaw Diseases, Jaw, Edentulous
Shiraz, Fars, Iran
View Trial DetailsRidge Preservation Comparing a Flap Versus Flapless Technique
NCT04271423
Jaw Diseases, Jaw, Edentulous
View Trial Details