Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05140278

Study to Compare Feasibility of 1-step Injectable Artesunate vs. Conventional 2-step Injectable Artesunate

The objectives of this study contains 3 parts: (1) a comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate (AS) versus conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times in two countries, (2) a quantification of convenience and costs of the new 1-step artesunate parenteral formulation versus the conventional formulation in a randomised study, (3) A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 & Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, and drug replacement.

The conventional formulation of injectable artesunate requires a 2-step reconstitution and dilution of the artesunate hemisuccinate powder. A new formulation of injectable artesunate has been developed by Fosun Pharma requiring a simpler 1-step reconstitution. Bioequivalence of the new formulation to the conventional formulation.

For part 1, a total number of participants of this study would be 200 participants, estimated 100 per site will be recruited. For part 2, a total number of 40 semi-structured interviews with study staff, health staff, policy makers, and stake holders; and survey/questionnaires with 150 health staff.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

3 month–16 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

KIMORU (KIMORU /ESP Research Center)

Kinshasa, 8502, Democratic Republic of the Congo

About this study

Study design:

Part 1

A comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times of 1-step parenteral artesunate to conventional artesunate in 2 countries. Patients with severe malaria will be enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment with conventional injectable artesunate or 1-step injectable artesunate. A physical examination will be performed daily and every six hours on indication. Vital signs rec-orded hourly for unstable patients, then 6 hourly for stabilised patients, and at each follow-up visit. A symptom questionnaire will be taken daily to help identify adverse events. Patients will be asked to come back for a follow-up visit at day 7, 14, 21 and 28. Patients will not be followed up longer. In case of unresolved important sequelae at day 28, the patient will be followed and treated longer in order to provide the appropriate clinical care.

A Time and Motion study will record the time to prepare the artesunate solution for injection and administer treatment, number of actions performed to prepare treatment, and consumables used. Clinical, parasitological, and laboratory assessments will be recorded while patients are admitted in hospital and then weekly up to day 28 to assess recovery and determine final status.

Part 2

A mixed method social science study that entails semi-structure interviews and survey with study staff (involved in part 1), health workers (who treat severe malaria) and policymakers and stakeholders (who are involved in devising national malaria policy and its implementation), to assess the acceptability, feasibility, pros and cons, costs, and logistics and training implications of 1-step artesunate vs conventional artesunate. For both sites, semi-structure interviews will be conducted with minimum of a total of 40 respondents consisting of study staff, health staff and policy makers and stakeholders. The ultimate sample for semi-structure interviews will be dependent on the data saturation. For survey/questionnaire, a maximum number of relevant participants (study staff and health care staff) will be attempted to be recruited from two sites. A minimum of 150 study staff and health care staff will be recruited in the survey.

Part 3

A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 & Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, drug replacement.

In addition to time measurement, the observer will also record the resources used for the administration of artesunate. This will include the vials themselves, as well as other consumables required for the administration (syringes, needles, catheters, etc.).

Funder:

  • Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Industrial Development Co., Ltd
  • Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit supported by the Wellcome Trust, UK (220211)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Part 1:

  • Male and female children aged >3months and <16 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of severe P. falciparum malaria; or parasitological confirmed P. falciparum hyperparasitaemia >350,000/ uL.
  • Positive malaria test result, by rapid diagnostic test RDT.
  • Weight of 5 kg or greater.
  • Written informed consent by the parent or guardian.

Part 2:

Study staff and health staff

  • Study staff who prepare and administer Artesunate injection to patients in the study or health staff who have not administer the Artesunate injection to patients in the study by themselves but are either aware of malaria treatment, Artesunate injection, or have observed the treat-ment provided to severe malaria patients.
  • Written informed consent by the study staff and health staff

Study staff for a short video-record

  • Study staff who would like to participate in the video record of a procedure to show how 1-step and 2-step Artesunate injections are prepared and administered.
  • Written informed consent by the study staff

Policymakers and stakeholders

  • Those who are working in the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) or relevant organizations (WHO, INGOs/NGOs) within the country.
  • Written informed consent by the potential participant

Exclusion criteria

Part 1:

  • Participation in other intervention studies
  • Known allergy to artemisinin derivatives.
  • Known history of parenteral treatment for severe malaria for the current episode of illness before admission. Treatment before admission with an oral antimalarial drug (used for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria) or a single dose of pre-referral rectal artesunate are not exclusion criteria.

Part 2:

Study staff and health staff; Policymakers and stakeholders; Study staff and health staff for a short video-record

  • Unwilling to participate in the study
  • Unable to communicate

Treatment and study plan

Argesun 60mg (1 step parenteral artesunate)

Drug

Each vial of powder contains 60mg artesunate. Each ampoule of 6 ml solvent contains: sodium bicarbonate 8.4mg/ml; arginine 20mg/ml.

Artesun 60mg (2-step parenteral artesunate)

Drug

Each vial of powder contains 60 mg artesunate. Each ampoule of 1 ml solvent contains 50 mg sodium bicarbonate. Each ampoule of 5 ml diluent contains 45 mg sodium chloride.

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to administration of treatment comparing 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations

    Time frame: 3 days

    Time to administration of treatment comparing 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations (by time-and-motion methods).

  2. Costs of administration of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations

    Time frame: 3 days

    Costs of administration of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations at health facility, and at health system level.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implementation perspective assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate

    Time frame: 45 minutes

    Implementation perspective assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders

  2. Practicability assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate

    Time frame: 45 minutes

    Practicability assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders

  3. Satisfaction assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate

    Time frame: 45 minutes

    Satisfaction assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders

Other outcomes

  1. Parasite clearance half-life and other parasite clearance parameters compared between 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations.

    Time frame: 28 days

    Parasite clearance half-life and other parasite clearance parameters (PC50, PC90, 12-hour parasite reduction ratio) compared between 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations.

  2. Time from start parenteral treatment to follow up treatment with an oral ACT

    Time frame: 28 days

    Time from start parenteral treatment to follow up treatment with an oral ACT (recovery to per os treatment) of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations.

  3. Fever clearance time

    Time frame: 28 days

    Fever clearance time (i.e. the time taken for the tympanic temperature to fall below 37.5˚C and remain there for at least 24 hours) of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations

  4. Incidence of adverse events

    Time frame: 28 days

    Incidence of adverse events by study arms within the first 28 days.

  5. Incidence of serious adverse events by study arms

    Time frame: 28 days

    Incidence of serious adverse events by study arms

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania
  • Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Industrial Development Co. Ltd.
  • University of Kinshasa

Registry information

Official study title

Convenience and Cost-aspects of a New 1-step Reconstitution Injectable Artesunate Compared to Conventional 2-step Injectable Artesunate for the Treatment of Severe Falciparum Malaria: a Multi-centre Study

Acronym: 1STEP-AS

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.