KIMORU (KIMORU /ESP Research Center)
Kinshasa, 8502, Democratic Republic of the Congo
NCT Number: NCT05140278
The objectives of this study contains 3 parts: (1) a comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate (AS) versus conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times in two countries, (2) a quantification of convenience and costs of the new 1-step artesunate parenteral formulation versus the conventional formulation in a randomised study, (3) A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 & Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, and drug replacement.
The conventional formulation of injectable artesunate requires a 2-step reconstitution and dilution of the artesunate hemisuccinate powder. A new formulation of injectable artesunate has been developed by Fosun Pharma requiring a simpler 1-step reconstitution. Bioequivalence of the new formulation to the conventional formulation.
For part 1, a total number of participants of this study would be 200 participants, estimated 100 per site will be recruited. For part 2, a total number of 40 semi-structured interviews with study staff, health staff, policy makers, and stake holders; and survey/questionnaires with 150 health staff.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 month–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Kinshasa, 8502, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Study design:
Part 1
A comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times of 1-step parenteral artesunate to conventional artesunate in 2 countries. Patients with severe malaria will be enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment with conventional injectable artesunate or 1-step injectable artesunate. A physical examination will be performed daily and every six hours on indication. Vital signs rec-orded hourly for unstable patients, then 6 hourly for stabilised patients, and at each follow-up visit. A symptom questionnaire will be taken daily to help identify adverse events. Patients will be asked to come back for a follow-up visit at day 7, 14, 21 and 28. Patients will not be followed up longer. In case of unresolved important sequelae at day 28, the patient will be followed and treated longer in order to provide the appropriate clinical care.
A Time and Motion study will record the time to prepare the artesunate solution for injection and administer treatment, number of actions performed to prepare treatment, and consumables used. Clinical, parasitological, and laboratory assessments will be recorded while patients are admitted in hospital and then weekly up to day 28 to assess recovery and determine final status.
Part 2
A mixed method social science study that entails semi-structure interviews and survey with study staff (involved in part 1), health workers (who treat severe malaria) and policymakers and stakeholders (who are involved in devising national malaria policy and its implementation), to assess the acceptability, feasibility, pros and cons, costs, and logistics and training implications of 1-step artesunate vs conventional artesunate. For both sites, semi-structure interviews will be conducted with minimum of a total of 40 respondents consisting of study staff, health staff and policy makers and stakeholders. The ultimate sample for semi-structure interviews will be dependent on the data saturation. For survey/questionnaire, a maximum number of relevant participants (study staff and health care staff) will be attempted to be recruited from two sites. A minimum of 150 study staff and health care staff will be recruited in the survey.
Part 3
A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 & Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, drug replacement.
In addition to time measurement, the observer will also record the resources used for the administration of artesunate. This will include the vials themselves, as well as other consumables required for the administration (syringes, needles, catheters, etc.).
Funder:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Part 1:
Part 2:
Study staff and health staff
Study staff for a short video-record
Policymakers and stakeholders
Exclusion criteria
Part 1:
Part 2:
Study staff and health staff; Policymakers and stakeholders; Study staff and health staff for a short video-record
Each vial of powder contains 60mg artesunate. Each ampoule of 6 ml solvent contains: sodium bicarbonate 8.4mg/ml; arginine 20mg/ml.
Each vial of powder contains 60 mg artesunate. Each ampoule of 1 ml solvent contains 50 mg sodium bicarbonate. Each ampoule of 5 ml diluent contains 45 mg sodium chloride.
Time frame: 3 days
Time to administration of treatment comparing 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations (by time-and-motion methods).
Time frame: 3 days
Costs of administration of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations at health facility, and at health system level.
Time frame: 45 minutes
Implementation perspective assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders
Time frame: 45 minutes
Practicability assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders
Time frame: 45 minutes
Satisfaction assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders
Time frame: 28 days
Parasite clearance half-life and other parasite clearance parameters (PC50, PC90, 12-hour parasite reduction ratio) compared between 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations.
Time frame: 28 days
Time from start parenteral treatment to follow up treatment with an oral ACT (recovery to per os treatment) of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations.
Time frame: 28 days
Fever clearance time (i.e. the time taken for the tympanic temperature to fall below 37.5˚C and remain there for at least 24 hours) of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations
Time frame: 28 days
Incidence of adverse events by study arms within the first 28 days.
Time frame: 28 days
Incidence of serious adverse events by study arms
University of Oxford
Other
Convenience and Cost-aspects of a New 1-step Reconstitution Injectable Artesunate Compared to Conventional 2-step Injectable Artesunate for the Treatment of Severe Falciparum Malaria: a Multi-centre Study
Acronym: 1STEP-AS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04675931
Infections, Malaria
Burkina Faso
View Trial DetailsNCT06064591
Asyptomatic Plasmodium Infection, Infections
Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07355426
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Kinshasa, Kinshasa City, Democratic Republic of the Congo
View Trial DetailsNCT04176029
Infections, Malaria
Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
View Trial Details