Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01500278

Study to Assess the Short- and Long-term Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Plus Methotrexate Compared to Adalimumab Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Inadequately Responding to Methotrexate

This study is conducted to evaluate the short (12 Weeks) and long term (104 Weeks) efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol compared with Adalimumab both in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) that is not responding adequately to MTX.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

6, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject must have a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) at Screening, as defined by the 2010 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria (Aletaha D et al, 2010)
  • Subject must have a positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or a positive anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide antibody (anti-CCP) as determined by the central laboratory at Screening
  • Subject must have moderate to severe RA disease at Screening and Baseline defined as:
  • Screening (all criteria required)
  • ≥ 4 swollen joints (of 28 prespecified joints)
  • Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28[ESR]) > 3.2
  • C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentration ≥ 10 mg/L (or 1.0 mg/dL) or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (Westergren) ≥ 28 mm/hr
  • Baseline (both criteria required)
  • ≥ 4 swollen joints (of 28 prespecified joints)
  • Disease Activity Score [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28[ESR]) > 3.2
  • Subject must have inadequately responded previously to Methotrexate (MTX)
  • Subject is using MTX 15 to 25 mg/week orally or subcutaneously at Screening and has used the same MTX regimen for a minimum of 28 days prior to Baseline

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject has previously received any biological Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) or has received treatment with cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, Janus Kinase, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors or investigational agents such as spleen tyrosine kinase
  • Diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis
  • Infected with Tuberculosis (TB) or high risk of acquiring TB infection
  • Subjects with concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection
  • Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent infections or subjects at high risk of infection
  • Use of prohibited medications like nonbiological DMARDs (excluding MTX), biological DMARDs excluding study medications, experimental therapy, IA hyaluronic acid

Treatment and study plan

Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)

Biological
  • Active substance: an injectable volume of 1 ml solution for injection CZP
  • Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes CZP
  • Concentration: 200 mg/ml CZP
  • Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously: loading dose of CZP 400 mg at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Other names: Cimzia, CZP

Adalimumab (ADA)

Biological
  • Active substance: an injectable volume of 0.8 ml solution for injection ADA
  • Pharmaceutical form: prefilled syringes ADA
  • Concentration: 40 mg/0.8 ml ADA
  • Route of Administration: injections will be given subcutaneously. ADA 40 mg plus an injection with Placebo (to preserve blind) at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4, followed by ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks through Week 102 or withdrawal.

Other names: Humira, ADA

Methotrexate (MTX)

Drug
  • Active substance: Methotrexate
  • Pharmaceutical form: oral tablet
  • Concentration: 15-25 mg/week
  • Route of Administration: MTX orally

Other names: MTX

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Who Met the American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) Criteria at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Subjects who met the ACR20 criteria were those subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS).

  2. Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104

    Time frame: Week 104

    DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Week 12 Responders Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104

    Time frame: Week 104

    DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.

    The definition of Week 12 responders was DAS28[ESR] Low Disease Activity (LDA) (ie ≤ 3.2) or an improvement of ≥ 1.2 in DAS28[ESR] relative to Baseline.

  2. Percentage of Subjects Who Met the American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) Criteria at Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    Subjects who met the ACR20 criteria were those subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS).

  3. Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.

  4. Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.

  5. Percentage of Subjects With a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104, in Subjects Responding at Both Week 6 and Week 12

    Time frame: Week 104

    DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity.

    The definition of Week 6/12 responders was DAS28[ESR] Low Disease Activity (LDA) (ie ≤ 3.2) or an improvement of ≥ 1.2 in DAS28[ESR] relative to Baseline.

  6. Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 104

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 104

    HAQ-DI was derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question was scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do), and the total HAQ-DI was scored on the scale of 0-3 as well. Change from Baseline was computed as the value at Week 104 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement.

  7. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinued After Response at Week 12

    Time frame: From Week 12 up to Week 104

    Response at Week 12 means that a subject had either a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 12 or had a reduction of DAS28 [ESR] ≥ 1.2 from Baseline to Week 12. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Proportion of Subjects Discontinued are presented per study week (days relative to Week 12 visit).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UCB Pharma SA

Industry

Collaborators

  • Parexel

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Single-blind, Randomized Parallel-group Study to Assess the Short- and Long-term Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Plus Methotrexate Compared to Adalimumab Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Responding Inadequately to Methotrexate

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Dec 28, 2011
Registry last updated
Jul 31, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.