Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03226678

Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy and PK of APL-2 in Patients With Warm Type Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) or Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD)

This study is to assess the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of APL-2 in subjects with warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) or Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

American Institute of Research, Whittier, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Weight < 125 Kg.
  • Subjects must have a primary diagnosis of wAIHA or CAD defined by the presence of hemolytic anemia and positive DAT for wAIHA (IgG) or CAD (C3).
  • Hemoglobin <11 g/dL.
  • Signs of hemolysis with abnormal values by any of the hemolytic markers:
  • Increased absolute reticulocyte count (above ULN)
  • Reduced haptoglobin (below LLN)
  • Increased lactase dehydrogenase (LDH) (above ULN)
  • Increased indirect bilirubin (above ULN)
  • Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) (defined as any female who has experienced menarche and who is NOT permanently sterile or postmenopausal. Postmenopausal is defined as 12 consecutive months with no menses without an alternative medical cause) must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and must agree to use protocol defined methods of contraception for the duration of the study and 60 days after their last dose of study drug.
  • Males must agree to use protocol defined methods of contraception and agree to refrain from donating sperm for the duration of the study and 60 days after their last dose of study drug.
  • Able to provide documentary evidence of the following vaccinations within 2 years prior to screening:
  • Neisseria meningitides types A, C, W, Y and type B (administered as two separate vaccinations)
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 [PCV13 and/or PPSV23, respectively])
  • Haemophilus influenzae Type B (Hib) vaccine

Subjects that do not have documentary evidence must be willing to receive any missing vaccinations as outlined below:

  • Neisseria meningitides types A, C, W, Y and type B must be administered prior to dosing on Day 1. A booster is administered after at least 8 weeks (Day 56; for both vaccinations).
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae PCV13 must be administered prior to dosing on Day 1 (see Section 12.2 for details). A PPSV23 booster is administered after at least 8 weeks (Day 56)
  • Haemophilus influenze Type B (Hib) must be administered prior to dosing on Day 1.
  • Willing and able to give informed consent.
  • Specific for wAIHA: Relapsed from, did not respond or relapsed, or did not tolerate, at least one prior wAIHA treatment regimen (such as prednisone, rituximab).

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior treatment with rituximab within 90 days.
  • Deficiency of iron, folic acid and vitamin B12 prior to treatment phase
  • Abnormal liver function as indicated by a direct bilirubin above normal level, and/or an AST or ALT level > 2x upper limit of normal. Please note elevated indirect bilirubin due to hemolysis is not an exclusion criteria.
  • Elevated bilirubin not due to active hemolysis. Any elevation of bilirubin >ULN will require Sponsor review and approval for subject enrollment into the trial.
  • Active aggressive lymphoma requiring therapy or an active non-lymphatic malignant disease other than basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the cervix.
  • Presence or suspicion of active bacterial or viral infection, in the opinion of the Investigator, at screening or severe recurrent bacterial infections.
  • Participation in any other investigational drug trial or exposure to other investigational agent, device, or procedure within 30 days prior to screening period.
  • Pregnant, breast-feeding, or intending to conceive during the course of the study, including the Post-Treatment Phase.
  • Inability to cooperate or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could increase the subject's risk by participating in the study or confound the outcome of the study.
  • Myocardial infarction, CABG, coronary or cerebral artery stenting and /or angioplasty, stroke, cardiac surgery, or hospitalization for congestive heart failure within 3 months or > Class 2 Angina Pectoris or NYHA Heart Failure Class >2
  • QTcF > 470 ms
  • PR > 280 ms
  • Mobitz II 2nd degree AV Block, 2:1 AV Block, High Grade AV Block, or Complete Heart Block unless the patient has an implanted pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) with backup pacing capabilities

Treatment and study plan

APL-2

Drug

Complement (C3) Inhibitor

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Including by Severity

    Time frame: Part A:From first dose of study drug (Part A Day 1) up to 30days after last dose of study drug in Part A,approximately 366days Part B:From first dose of study drug (Part B Day 1) up to 56days after last dose of study drug in Part B,approximately 980days

    TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) that occurred after dosing on Day 1 and up to 56 days after the last dose of study drug. A treatment-related TEAE is defined as a TEAE with a relationship to study drug of probably, possibly, unlikely, or unrelated. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of ability to conduct normal life functions; was a congenital anomaly or birth defect. TEAEs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 based on: Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening; Grade 5: Death related to AE.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Weeks 48 and 132

    Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132

    Hematology assessments of hemoglobin were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in hemoglobin results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.

  2. Number of Subjects Who Received Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions

    Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 132

    The number of on-study RBC transfusions were monitored throughout the treatment period.

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Absolute Reticulocyte Count (ARC) at Weeks 48 and 132

    Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132

    Hematology assessments of ARC were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in ARC results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at Weeks 48 and 132

    Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132

    Serum chemistry assessments of LDH were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in LDH results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin at Weeks 48 and 132

    Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132

    Serum chemistry assessments of haptoglobin were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in haptoglobin results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin at Weeks 48 and 132

    Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132

    Serum chemistry assessments of indirect bilirubin were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in indirect bilirubin results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.

  7. Maximum Observed Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough,Max) of Pegcetacoplan

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 4 hours postdose on Day 1; pre-dose on Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120 and 132

    Blood samples were collected for the assessment of Ctrough,max of pegcetacoplan.

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score at Weeks 48 and 132

    Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132

    The FACIT-Fatigue Scale is a 13 item Likert scaled instrument where the subject was presented with 13 statements and asked to indicate their response as it applied to the past 7 days. The 5 possible responses were 'Not at all' (0), 'A little bit (1), 'Somewhat' (2), 'Quite a bit' (3) and 'Very much' (4). There are 13 statements with the total score ranging from 0 to 52 and higher scores indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Linear Analog Scale Assessment (LASA) Score at Weeks 48 and 132

    Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132

    The LASA consists of 5 single statements asking subjects to rate their perceived level of functioning. Specific domains include physical well-being (fatigue, activity level), emotional well-being (depression, anxiety, stress), spiritual well-being (sense of meaning), and intellectual well-being (ability to think clearly and concentrate). An item for overall quality of life is also included. Each domain scale range from 0 to 10. Where, 0 = as bad as it can be and 10 = as good as it can be. The total score ranging from 0 to 50 and higher scores indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline in LASA score results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open Label, Prospective, Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of APL-2 in Patients With Warm Type Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) or Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD)

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 24, 2017
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.