APL-2
DrugComplement (C3) Inhibitor
NCT Number: NCT03226678
This study is to assess the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of APL-2 in subjects with warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) or Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
American Institute of Research, Whittier, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects that do not have documentary evidence must be willing to receive any missing vaccinations as outlined below:
Exclusion criteria
Complement (C3) Inhibitor
Time frame: Part A:From first dose of study drug (Part A Day 1) up to 30days after last dose of study drug in Part A,approximately 366days Part B:From first dose of study drug (Part B Day 1) up to 56days after last dose of study drug in Part B,approximately 980days
TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) that occurred after dosing on Day 1 and up to 56 days after the last dose of study drug. A treatment-related TEAE is defined as a TEAE with a relationship to study drug of probably, possibly, unlikely, or unrelated. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of ability to conduct normal life functions; was a congenital anomaly or birth defect. TEAEs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 based on: Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening; Grade 5: Death related to AE.
Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132
Hematology assessments of hemoglobin were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in hemoglobin results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 132
The number of on-study RBC transfusions were monitored throughout the treatment period.
Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132
Hematology assessments of ARC were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in ARC results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.
Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132
Serum chemistry assessments of LDH were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in LDH results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.
Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132
Serum chemistry assessments of haptoglobin were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in haptoglobin results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.
Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132
Serum chemistry assessments of indirect bilirubin were made at the last measurement prior to the first dose of pegcetacoplan (baseline) and periodically throughout the different parts of the treatment period. Mean change from baseline in indirect bilirubin results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 4 hours postdose on Day 1; pre-dose on Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120 and 132
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of Ctrough,max of pegcetacoplan.
Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132
The FACIT-Fatigue Scale is a 13 item Likert scaled instrument where the subject was presented with 13 statements and asked to indicate their response as it applied to the past 7 days. The 5 possible responses were 'Not at all' (0), 'A little bit (1), 'Somewhat' (2), 'Quite a bit' (3) and 'Very much' (4). There are 13 statements with the total score ranging from 0 to 52 and higher scores indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.
Time frame: Part A: Baseline (Day 1 of Part A) and Week 48; Part B: Baseline (Day 1 of Part B) and Week 132
The LASA consists of 5 single statements asking subjects to rate their perceived level of functioning. Specific domains include physical well-being (fatigue, activity level), emotional well-being (depression, anxiety, stress), spiritual well-being (sense of meaning), and intellectual well-being (ability to think clearly and concentrate). An item for overall quality of life is also included. Each domain scale range from 0 to 10. Where, 0 = as bad as it can be and 10 = as good as it can be. The total score ranging from 0 to 50 and higher scores indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline in LASA score results were summarized from Part A baseline for Part A reporting groups and from Part B baseline for Part B reporting groups.
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Industry
An Open Label, Prospective, Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of APL-2 in Patients With Warm Type Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) or Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05757570
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01181154
Anemia, Hematologic Diseases
Créteil, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07549698
Autoimmune Diseases, Blood Coagulation Disorders
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07039422
Autoimmune Diseases, Blood Coagulation Disorders
Buenos Aires, Argentina
View Trial Details