Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01646385

Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept in Patients Treated Over the Long-term in Real-world Clinical Practice, Using Data Collected by the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Registry

This study will assess the rates of serious adverse events and death in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with etanercept over the long-term in real-life clinical practice. It will also assess whether there is any difference in the rate of serious adverse events in patients trated with etanercept in comparision to patients treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study will in addition quantify the efficacy of etanercept in this population by assessing the rates of important clinical outcomes such as changes in disease activity and disability/functioning.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

patients recruited sequentially as seen in clinical practice

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • group 1: initiating etanercept as first biologic therapy
  • group 2: DAS28<4.2, biologic naive and treated with non-biologic DMARDs

Exclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of other inflammatory arthritis

Treatment and study plan

etanercept

Drug

use as per routine clinical practice

non-biologic anti-rheumatic drugs

Drug

use as per routine clinical practice (methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, leflunomide, other)

Primary outcomes

  1. Crude Incidence Rate of Malignancy

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by mean follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of malignancy events divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000.

  2. Crude Incidence Rate of Lymphoproliferative Malignancy (LM)

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by mean follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of LMs divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Lymphoproliferative: medical condition characterized by the dysfunction of the immune system often resulting in excessive production of lymphocytes. LMs included lymphoma, myeloma, and leukemia. Adverse outcome was defined as 'lymphoproliferative malignancy' in the field [lymphopro] labeled by BSRBR.

  3. Crude Incidence Rate of Serious Infections

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by total follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of serious infections divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Serious infections included those infections which required intravenous antibiotics, hospitalization, or resulted in death. Adverse outcome was defined as 'serious infection' in the field [serinf] labeled by BSRBR.

  4. Crude Incidence Rate of Other Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by total follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of other serious adverse events divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Other serious adverse events were based on classifications assigned by the BSRBR and included cardiac serious adverse events (SAEs), central nervous system SAEs, and nonmalignant hematological SAEs.

  5. Crude Incidence Rate of All-Cause Mortality

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by total follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of deaths divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Death was recorded in the adverse outcomes table and in the consultant follow-up table. Where multiple events described death for the same participant, date of death was taken as per the earliest record.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Other Therapy Following Etanercept Discontinuation

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    Participants who switched from etanercept to either DMARDs or alternative biologic drug are reported.

  2. Time on Etanercept Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    Time on etanercept therapy was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

  3. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC) using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR, millimeter per hour] or C-reactive protein [CRP, milligram per liter]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a Visual Analog Scale [VAS] of 0 millimeter [mm]-100 mm). DAS28 <=1.6 = remission, DAS28 <=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 >5.1 = severe disease activity.

  4. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

    Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

    DAS28 calculated from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (ESR [millimeter per hour] or CRP [milligram per liter]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a VAS scale of 0 mm-100 mm). DAS28 <=1.6 = remission, DAS28 <=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 >5.1 = severe disease activity.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)

    Time frame: Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

    DAS28 calculated from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (ESR [millimeter per hour] or CRP [milligram per liter]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a VAS scale of 0 mm-100 mm). DAS28 <=1.6 = remission, DAS28 <=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 >5.1 = severe disease activity.

  6. Time to Remission

    Time frame: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years

    DAS28 calculated from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (ESR [millimeter per hour] or CRP [milligram per liter]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a VAS scale of 0 mm-100 mm). DAS28 <=1.6 = remission, DAS28 <=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 >5.1 = severe disease activity. Time to achieve remission was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

  7. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline

    HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.

  8. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Year 1, 2, and 3

    Time frame: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3

    HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score

    Time frame: Year 1, 2, 3

    HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3. Participants who had HAQ total score <=0.5 were considered in remission state.

  10. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score 6 Months Prior to And 6 Months Post-Switching Etanercept

    Time frame: 6 months prior to and 6 months post switching etanercept

    HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept in a UK Observational Cohort Study - a Retrospective Database Analysis of British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Registry (BSRBR) Data

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jul 20, 2012
Registry last updated
Aug 5, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.