Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06394869

Study to Assess the Impact of the Urine Test Cxbladder Triage Plus on the Number of Cystoscopies Performed on Patients With Invisible Blood in Their Urine.

This study includes adult patients who see a urologist because of blood in their urine. The amount is so small it can only be seen with a microscope. This is called microhematuria. There can be many reasons for microhematuria. One of them is bladder cancer. While bladder cancer is one of the biggest worries, it is only found in few of these patients.

Most microhematuria patients will have a cystoscopy to look inside the bladder. During a cystoscopy, a small camera is inserted into the bladder. This is done through the urethra, the tube that passes urine from the bladder to the outside. In some patients it can cause pain or anxiety. Not all patients have a cystoscopy. Those that don't, usually return for a urine sample within 6 months. This is done to check if there is still blood in their urine.

This study is conducted to find out if the use of "Cxbladder Triage Plus" changes the number of cystoscopies in microhematuria patients. Cxbladder Triage Plus is also called "Triage Plus". It is a lab test that was developed to check how likely urothelial carcinoma is present in the bladder. Urothelial carcinoma is by far the most common type of bladder cancer. For the test, the patient voids some urine into a cup. A laboratory then checks the urine of specific genetic material. Abnormalities can be a sign of urothelial carcinoma. The result indicates if the urine is more like most normal urine or more like that of urothelial carcinoma patients.

The study is done to find out how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies. Study participants first void urine into a cup. The urine is used for the Triage Plus test. The patients are then assigned to one of two groups. The assignment is random. This means the nobody can influence the assignment. The chance to be assigned to either group is the same. In the test group, the urologist will receive the Triage Plus result and discuss it with the patient. Together they decide whether to do a cystoscopy. In the control group, the urologist will not receive the Triage Plus result. The patient will also not get the result. The urologist and patient will follow standard of care to decide whether to do a cystoscopy.

For test group patients, the study gives a recommendation whether to proceed with cystoscopy. It is based on the patient's Triage Plus result. The urologist and patient do not need to follow the recommendation. If the urologist does not follow it, they will complete a survey. The survey has only one question. It is asking for the reasons of the decision.

After making their decision, patients will follow the chosen pathway. Data on the performed procedures are collected. The diagnosis will also be documented. Data will be collected for up to about 9 months.

To see how Triage Plus changes the number of cystoscopies, these will be counted in each group and then compared.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–88 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Urology Centers of Alabama, Homewood, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is referred for assessment of recent hematuria, defined as either:
  • Microscopic hematuria (≥3 RBC/HPF or equivalent) on urine microscopy obtained within 180 days prior to enrollment, OR
  • Hematuria detected by dipstick analysis (≥2+ blood or equivalent) at referral and confirmed on the same calendar day and prior to enrollment, with urine microscopy collected on the same day as enrollment
  • Physically able to provide a voided urine sample from a bladder that has not been surgically altered.
  • Able to give informed, written consent.
  • Able and willing to comply with study requirements.
  • Must be 19 or the legal age of consent in the jurisdiction in which the study is taking place to 88 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Ability to comprehend written and spoken English sufficiently to independently follow all study procedures. Or ability to comprehend Spanish with access to an English-Spanish interpreter for all study related verbal instructions and discussions.

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior history of bladder malignancy.
  • Prior history of upper tract UC or prostatic urethral UC.
  • History of gross hematuria requiring instrumentation or hospitalization within the last 12 months
  • Reconstructed or diverted bladder (e.g., bladder augmentation, ileal conduit, Indiana pouch)
  • Indication to recommend cystoscopy other than MH (e.g., bothersome benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms and desires a procedure, weak stream with concerns for urethral stricture).
  • Cystoscopy contraindicated due to another condition or anatomy.
  • History of pelvic radiation.
  • Currently receiving systemic chemotherapy or has had systemic chemotherapy within the last 6 weeks.
  • History of schistosomiasis.
  • History of chronic (>3 months) indwelling Foley catheter or chronic (>3 months) bladder stones.
  • Known current pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Cxbladder Triage Plus

Diagnostic Test

Cxbladder Triage Plus is a lab developed, test that is using RNA and DNA biomarkers in the urine to assess the likelihood of the presence of urothelial carcinoma in the bladder.

Primary outcomes

  1. Cystoscopy rate

    Time frame: 3 months from the decision to perform or not perform cystoscopy.

    Difference in the proportion of cystoscopies performed in each arm.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Detection of urothelial carcinoma (UC)

    Time frame: At the end of the current investigation, i.e. when a diagnosis was made or it was decided not to perform diagnostic procedures other than surveillance. Expected within approximately 120 days after sampling.

    Difference in the proportion of UCs found in each arm.

  2. Cxbladder Triage Plus performance and test negative rate.

    Time frame: Up to 180 days after the investigational decision (whether to proceed with cystoscopy) was made.

    Number of false positive, true positive, false negative and true negative test results when comparing the Triage Plus result to the results of histopathologically confirmed cystoscopy.

  3. Persistent hematuria.

    Time frame: At urinalysis 90-180 days (of the decision to proceed with surveillance)

    Rate of persistent hematuria in patients choosing surveillance.

  4. Missed UCs

    Time frame: At the end of the current investigation, i.e. when a diagnosis was made or it was decided not to perform diagnostic procedures other than surveillance. Expected within approximately 120 days after sampling.]

    Number of UCs in both arms identified during the surveillance phase.

  5. Imaging Rates

    Time frame: 3-months prior to 6-months post enrollment

    Change in imaging rates between arms

  6. Rate of imaging procedures

    Time frame: 3 months from the decision to perform or not perform cystoscopy.

    Sub-analyses on AUA risk categories for primary and secondary objectives

Other outcomes

  1. Physician rationale

    Time frame: After reviewing the Detect+ result and giving their recommendation, before cystoscopy (if applicable). Expected once and within 90 days of sampling

    Physician-reported reasons for not following the study recommended pathway based on the Detect+ result.

  2. Imaging Utilisation

    Time frame: From 3 months prior to 6 months post enrollment.

    Change in number and modality of imaging procedures

  3. Dipstick Subgroup

    Time frame: At enrolment

    Proportion of subjects enrolled via dipstick-positive hematuria who meet guideline-defined microhematuria based on urine microscopy.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Donna Smith

CONTACT

[email protected]

+64212436696

Tony Lough, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+64 (0)21 0223 8591

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pacific Edge Limited

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Cystoscopic REDuction In BLadder Evaluations for Microhematuria - A Prospective Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Utility Study for Evaluation of Microhematuria (The CREDIBLE Study)

Acronym: CREDIBLE

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 1, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.