AZD9567
DrugParticipants will receive 72 mg/day (oral suspension) of AZD9567 for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 1 and 40 mg/day for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 2.
NCT Number: NCT04556760
The study is intended to assess the effect on glycaemic control of AZD9567, as measured by the glucose AUC(0-4) versus baseline following a standardised mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT), compared to prednisolone in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The study will also evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AZD9567.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Research Site, Mainz, Germany
This is a randomised, double blind, multi-centre, double dummy, and two-way cross-over study.
There will be a total of three cohorts. Each cohort will be treated for two 72-hour periods in a cross-over design, with a 3-week washout period between treatment periods. The total length of participant engagement (from screening to follow-up) is 79 days.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive 72 mg/day (oral suspension) of AZD9567 for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 1 and 40 mg/day for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 2.
Participants will receive 40 mg/day of prednisolone for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 1, 20 mg/day of prednisolone for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 2, and 5 mg/day prednisolone for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 3.
Participants will receive placebo for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period in Cohort 3.
Time frame: On Days -1 (baseline), and Days 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
The change from baseline in glucose AUC(0-4) was analysed to determine the Pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of AZD9567 compared to Prednisolone following a standardised Mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT).
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: 48 to 72 hours
The mean glucose levels in mmol/L at 48-72 h was analysed to determine the effect of AZD9567 on CGM compared to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: Baseline and up to 72 hours (Treatment period 1 and 2)
The mean glucose level in mmol/L was analysed to determine the effect of AZD9567 on CGM compared to prednisolone.
For the calculation of the rise in mean glucose levels, the baseline was the average of the values from -24 hours to first dosing on Day 1 of each period.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Pharmacodynamic effects (fasting glucose) of AZD9567 following a MMTT were evaluated as compared to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on insulin AUC(0-4) were assessed following MMTT compared to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on glucagon AUC(0-4) were assessed following MMTT in comparison to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on GLP-1 AUC(0-4) were assessed following MMTT in comparison to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on GIP AUC(0-4) were assessed following MMTT in comparison to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on C-peptide AUC(0-4) were assessed through a MMTT in comparison to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on ΔI10/ΔG10 of beta cell function from the MMTT compared to Prednisolone was evaluated.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on ΔI30/ΔG30 of beta cell function from the MMTT compared to Prednisolone was evaluated.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on ΔC10/ΔG10 of beta cell function from the MMTT compared to Prednisolone was evaluated.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on ΔC30/ΔG30 of beta cell function from the MMTT compared to Prednisolone was evaluated.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
The concentration of potassium in urine was measured over 24 hours to determine the effect of AZD9567 on urinary potassium (U-K) excretion compared to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
The concentration of sodium in urine was measured over 24 hours to determine the effect of AZD9567 on urinary-sodium (U-Na) excretion compared to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: Upto 30 hours post dose (Treatment period 1 and 2)
AUClast of AZD9567 following once daily dosing was evaluated.
Time frame: 24 hours post dose
AUC(0-24) of AZD9567 following once daily dosing was evaluated.
Time frame: 6 hours post dose
AUC(0-6) of AZD9567 following once daily dosing was evaluated.
Time frame: Upto 30 hours post dose (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Cmax of AZD9567 following once daily dosing was evaluated.
Time frame: Upto 30 hours post dose (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Tmax of AZD9567 following once daily dosing was evaluated.
Time frame: Upto 30 hours post dose (Treatment period 1 and 2)
t½λz of AZD9567 following once daily dosing was evaluated.
Time frame: Upto 30 hours post dose (Treatment period 1 and 2)
CL/F of AZD9567 following once daily dosing was evaluated.
Time frame: Upto 30 hours post dose (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Vz/F of AZD9567 was derived using standard non-compartmental methods using WinNonLin version 8.1 or higher (Certara).
Time frame: On Days 3 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Relationship between AZD9567 exposure and inhibition of LPS-stimulated TNFα release for high and low dose comparison (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2) was assessed. LPS-stimulated TNFα concentration was measured.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Effects of AZD9567 on free fatty acids were evaluated following a MMTT compared to prednisolone.
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
The HOMA-IR was calculated based on glucose and insulin measured prior to MMTT.
HOMA-IR= Glucose(mmol/L) x Insulin (mU/L) / 22.5
HOMA-IR score estimates the degree of insulin resistance. Higher range indicates greater insulin resistance (i.e. high diabetes risk), while lower range indicates insulin sensitivity (i.e. low diabetes risk)
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: On Day -1 (Baseline), and Day 4 (Treatment period 1 and 2)
Insulin sensitivity is a term used to indicate the responsiveness of the peripheral tissue cells to insulin, and their resultant capacity to uptake glucose out of the bloodstream.
HOMA-S score estimates the degree of insulin sensitivity. HOMA-S was calculated as the reciprocal of HOMA-IR.
Higher values indicates greater insulin sensitivity (i.e. low diabetes risk), while lower values indicates insulin resistance (i.e. high diabetes risk)
In Cohort 1 and 2, Placebo was not administered, therefore in Placebo row the participants analyzed is kept as 0.
In Cohort 3, AZD9567 was not administered, therefore in AZD9567 row the participants analyzed is kept 0.
Time frame: From screening up to 79 days
Safety and tolerability of AZD9567 was assessed.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Phase 2a Randomised, Double Blind, Multi-centre Study to Assess the Effect on Glucose Homeostasis of Two Dose Levels of AZD9567, Compared to Prednisolone, in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details