AZD9150
DrugAZD9150
NCT Number: NCT02499328
This multicentre, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study is designed as a 2 part study consisting of a dose-escalation, safety run-in Part A and a dose-expansion Part B
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–130 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Research Site, Antwerp, Belgium
The dose-escalation Part A of this study will involve patients with advanced solid malignancies refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard of care regimen currently exists. Approximately 30 evaluable patients per treatment arm (A1 or A2) will be enrolled. A3 will test viability of alternate dosing schedule for AZD5069, A4/A5 will evaluate AZD9150/AZD5069 in fixed dose combination with MEDI4736 and tremelimumab in solid tumors. there may also be safety run in cohorts enrolled (A6/A7) in specific solid tumor types (breast and prostate cancer).
Once the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) for each of the 2 agents (AZD9150/AZD5069)in combination with MEDI4736 have been identified or the maximum doses of each of the 2 agents in combination with MEDI4736 have been reached, the dose expansion Part B of the study would commence. It will be conducted in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (RM) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Between 68 and 266 eligible patients will be enrolled and will randomly assigned to 1 of the following 6 treatment arms or non randomized arm B7:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Additional exclusion criteria Part B: Patients with brain metastases (known or suspected) Additional exclusion criteria Part B: treatment arms B3, B4, B5, B6, B7 and B8: prior exposure to AZD9150, AZD5069, MEDI4736, or any other anti PD (L)1 antibody.
AZD9150
MEDI4736
AZD5069
tremelimumab
Time frame: 35 days
After completion of DLT period (35 days) for the maximum dose cohort. A CRM-based approach was used to identify the set of dose combinations where the incidence of DLT was ≤ 33%. The dose with expected DLT incidence closest and below 0.33 at this point was the "model estimated" MTD. During trial execution, the Safety Review Committee (SRC) determined the MTD.
Time frame: 35 days
After completion of DLT period (35 days) for the maximum dose cohort. A CRM-based approach was used to identify the set of dose combinations where the incidence of DLT was ≤ 33%. The dose with expected DLT incidence closest and below 0.33 at this point was the "model estimated" MTD. During trial execution, the Safety Review Committee (SRC) determined the MTD.
Time frame: At every treatment and follow up visit until disease progression, an average of 1 year.
Number of subjects with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability including changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), safety and laboratory parameters
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months.
proportion of patients who have an objective response at a given visit. ORR will be summarised by treatment group. Objective rate is defined as a CR or PR according to RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Lead in day -7, AUC from time 0 to 6h (post dose).
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Lead in day -7
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at end of infusion, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1, AUC from time 0 to 6 h post dose
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1
Time frame: Lead in day -7, AUC from time 0 to 12h post dose
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Lead in day -7
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at Tmax, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at around Tmax, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 1 day 1
Time frame: Cycle 4 day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Ctrough we need to have samples at predose, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Ctrough calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 8 day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at end of infusion, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 1 day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at end of infusion, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 4 day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Ctrough we need to have samples at predose, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Ctrough calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Throughout the study, up to 3.3 years
Subject was considered ADA positive if any post dose samples had ADA positive result. Result was not stratified based on post dose time points.
Time frame: assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, an average of 1 year
complete response, partial response, stable disease or progressive disease based on RECIST
Time frame: At every treatment and follow up visit until disease progression, an average of 1 year.
Number of subjects with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability including changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), safety and laboratory parameters
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months
Disease control rate is confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD)
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 48 months
Duration of overall response is according to RECIST 1.1 criteria measured from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR or PR, whichever is first recorded, until the first date that recurrent or PD is objectively documented (taking as reference for PD the smallest measurements recorded on study). DOR is only applied to treatment groups where at least one response patient was recorded.
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months
progression-free survival (PFS): defined as the time from randomisation to the first documentation of PD as determined by the Investigator or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Only includes progression events that occur within 126 days of the last evaluable assessment
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 15 months
overall survival (OS) - defined as the time from treatment allocation to death from any cause
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months
proportion of patients alive at 12 months: the percentage of patients surviving at 12 months after randomization to study drug
Time frame: At Cycle 2 Day 1 vs. Baseline
Percent STAT3 RNA change in expression level in peripheral blood in patients who had baseline (Screening or Day -7) sample for comparison. Data were only available for B1, B3, B5, B7 and B8.
Time frame: in baseline tumor samples
Tumors with PDL1-positive tumor cells at the designated cutoff. Data were only available for B1, B2, B3, B4, B7 and B8.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Multicentre Study Assessing the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Anti-tumor Activity of MEDI4736 in Combination With AZD9150 or AZD5069 in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies and Subsequently Comparing AZD9150 and AZD5069 Both as Monotherapy and in Combination With MEDI4736 as Second Line Treatment in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.