Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07378163

Study on the Preferences for PCI Implantation Devices Among Doctors and Patients

The contemporary percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease typically involves initial lesion preparation with balloon angioplasty, followed by the deployment of a drug-eluting stent (DES) to provide an immediate scaffold and reduce the long-term risk of restenosis. However, stent implantation continues to present notable challenges, primarily due to the metallic scaffold left behind. Compared to DES, drug-coated balloons (DCB) provide a direct release of antiproliferative drugs into the vessel wall, preventing coronary restenosis after angioplasty and limiting the risk of stent-related events. DCBs are an established treatment option for in-stent restenosis and small vessels. However, the REC-CAGEFREE I trial demonstrated that a strategy of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting did not achieve non-inferiority compared with the intended DES implantation in patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease (CAD), irrespective of vessel diameter.

Previous studies have mainly focused on the efficacy of PCI strategies in reducing adverse event rates, while less attention has been paid to patients' willingness regarding stent implantation. The AHA conducted a systematic review on depression and poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), concluding that health organizations should consider depression as an official risk factor for poor prognosis after ACS. A prior study of patients with coronary artery disease after stent implantation found that their anxiety stemmed primarily from concerns about the stent's long-term effects and its impact on their social interaction. However, data regarding patients' preferences on the selection of DES or DCB is scarce, and whether the psychological impact would differ between DES- or DCB-treated patients is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the preferences of patients, as well as medical staff, for DES or DCB-based PCI.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Xijing Hospital

Xi'an, Shannxi, 710032, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Shutong Li, MBBS

CONTACT

[email protected]

13379338216

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with acute or chronic coronary syndrome who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention;
  • Patients who can understand the purpose of this trial and are willing to participate in the preference questionnaire.
  • Healthcare providers who treat patients with coronary artery disease.

Exclusion criteria

  • Aged < 18 years;
  • Inability to understand the questionnaire or presence of cognitive impairment.

Treatment and study plan

Questionnaire

Other

A questionnaire regarding the preference of DCB or DES-based PCI among patients with CAD and medical staff

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum acceptable risk in the trade-off of death

    Time frame: Before discharge

    To avoid permanent metallic stent implantation, the maximum acceptable increase in risk for patients and medical staff in choosing DCB treatment.

  2. Maximum acceptable risk in the trade-off of stroke

    Time frame: Before discharge

    To avoid permanent metallic stent implantation, the maximum acceptable increase in risk for patients and medical staff in choosing DCB treatment.

  3. Maximum acceptable risk in the trade-off of myocardial infarction

    Time frame: Before discharge

    To avoid permanent metallic stent implantation, the maximum acceptable increase in risk for patients and medical staff in choosing DCB treatment.

  4. Maximum acceptable risk in the trade-off of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    Time frame: Before discharge

    To avoid permanent metallic stent implantation, the maximum acceptable increase in risk for patients and medical staff in choosing DCB treatment.

  5. Maximum acceptable risk in the trade-off of revascularization

    Time frame: Before discharge

    To avoid permanent metallic stent implantation, the maximum acceptable increase in risk for patients and medical staff in choosing DCB treatment.

  6. Maximum acceptable risk in the trade-off of rehospitalization

    Time frame: Before discharge

    To avoid permanent metallic stent implantation, the maximum acceptable increase in risk for patients and medical staff in choosing DCB treatment.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ruining Zhang, BSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8618629551066

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xijing Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Study on the Preferences for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Implantation Devices Among Healthcare Providers and Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Acronym: REC-DEVICEPREF

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.