Ophthalmology unit
Lucca, Italy
NCT Number: NCT04633863
This is post-market study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MDI - 101 a novel tear substitute for the treatment of dry eye (DE) in subjects with evidence of inflammation of the ocular surface. In particular, this study intends to evaluate, in a cohort of 25 patients, the anti-inflammatory properties of the product under study over a period of 10 weeks
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lucca, Italy
DE is a common eye condition that affects 1 to 2 out of 10 persons in the world. Regardless of the underlying ethology, DE is associated with increased inflammation of conjunctiva, cornea and adnexa. As consequence of the recognized role of the inflammation in the etiopathogenesis of DE, direct and indirect anti-inflammatory treatments are currently the cornerstone for the management of DE, leading to the inhibition of the expression of inflammatory mediators on the ocular surface, therefore restoring the secretion of a healthy tear film and consequently reducing signs and symptoms of DE.
MDI - 101, the product under study containing arabinogalactan (AG), trehalose and hyaluronic acid (HA) ,is a medical device with European Conformity (CE) mark that, thanks to the muco-adhesive proprieties of AG enriches the natural mucous of the tear film providing enhanced lubrication and protection and anti-inflammatory properties, in combination with trehalose and HA. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the reduced ocular discomfort and the improvement of the integrity of the ocular surface are due to the interruption of the "vicious cycle of inflammation".
This open-label study involves a cohort of 24 patients with clinical and instrumental signs of inflammation of the ocular surface and includes end-points of efficacy, safety and evaluation of inflammation markers. The study includes 6 visits over 10 weeks, 8 of which of active treatment. This study is conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic and for this reason, clinical assessments of all the 24 patients are carried out remotely, from patients' home, with the adoption of digital solutions that determine: reduction of 66% of physical contacts between investigator and patient, a total of 90% of efficacy and safety data collected remotely and a reduction of 100% of physical contacts between investigator and clinical monitor, keeping the study entirely within the Good Clinical Practice framework.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
i. OSDI score of >18 evaluated by the questionnaire of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI); ii. Non-invasive breakup time (NIBUT) ≤10 seconds at least in one eye; iii. Levels of MMP-9 in tears ≥ 40 ng/ml as assessed by the Inflammatory assay at least in one eye; iv. Cornea surface scores ≥1 and <4, based on Efron grading system. -
Exclusion criteria
Medical device CE marked - artificial tears containing arabinogalactan, trehalose and hyaluronic acid - 10 weeks treatment
Time frame: 1 week - 2 weeks - 4 weeks - 6 weeks - 8 weeks
Change of OSDI score versus baseline at any study time-point. The main goal of the study is to gather information about the efficacy, assessed by OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, of artificial tear containing AG, trehalose and HA (MDI - 101) used in the treatment of symptoms of DE of various aetiology, with evidence of inflammation of the ocular surface. The OSDI score ranges from 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worst outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of tear matrix metalloproteinase(MMP)-9 at T0 vs final assessment. The result of the MMP test could be NEGATIVE if the level of MMP-9 is < 40 ng/ml (better outcome) or POSITIVE if the level of MMP-9 is ≥ 40 ng/ml (worst outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of Efron Grading Scales at T0 vs final assessment. The Efron grading scale range from 0 (cornea surface normale) to 4 (severe corneal damage)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of Corneal and Conjunctival Staining at T0 vs final assessment. The Staining scale ranges from 0 (better outcome) to 3 (worst outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of NIBUT at T0 vs final assessment. The result of the Non-Invasive Break-Up Time (NIBUT) test could be >10 seconds (better outcome) or ≤10 seconds (worst outcome)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of Osmolarity at T0 vs final assessment. The higher the tear film osmolarity, the greater the severity of the ocular surface damage.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of Ocular Protection Index (OPI) at T0 vs final assessment The principle of the test is that when BUT is shorter than the blink interval, the eyes are exposed to the risk of focal ocular surface damage.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of meniscometry at T0 vs final assessment. The lowest tear meniscus radius, the higher the severity of the ocular surface health
Time frame: 8 weeks
Safety Adverse Event (AE) experienced with the artificial tear assessed by the patient, before the ocular examination or reported by the patient at any time during the study.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Unaided and corrected visual acuity Snellen test will be performed to evaluate change in the unaided and corrected visual acuity at T0 vs final assessment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change of Intraocular pressure at T0 vs final assessment.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of instillations in the past 24 hours).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of instillations in the past 24 hours)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of days of product usage).
MD Italy
Industry
Pilot Study on Safety and Performance of an Artificial Tear Containing Arabinogalactan, Trehalose and Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Dry Eye in Subjects With Inflammation of the Ocular Surface
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07238699
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07025811
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07128628
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07264517
Autoimmune Diseases, Dry Eye Disease
Glendale, California, United States
View Trial Details