Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02918968

Study on Enzalutamide and Flutamide in Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy with enzalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the combination therapy with flutamide + ADT in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer who had relapsed during combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy with bicalutamide and ADT. This study also investigated the order of alternative antiandrogen therapy (AAT) by changing the 1st line medication after relapse of prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Genital Diseases Genital Diseases, Male Genital Neoplasms, Male Male Urogenital Diseases Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Prostatic Diseases Prostatic Neoplasms Urogenital Diseases Urogenital Neoplasms

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Site JP00024, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is diagnosed with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell histology.
  • Subject on continuous ADT with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist/antagonist or bilateral orchiectomy.
  • Serum testosterone level below the target level at screening visit.
  • Subject with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic prostate cancer.
  • Subject has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Subject has progression of the disease as defined by rising PSA levels or progressive soft tissue or bony disease during CAB therapy in combination of bicalutamide and ADT.
  • A sexually active male subject and the subject's female partner who is of childbearing potential must use 2 acceptable birth control methods from screening to 3 months after the last dose of the study drug.
  • Subject must agree not to donate sperm from screening to 3 months after the last dose of the study drug.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject with severe concurrent diseases, infections, or complications.
  • Subject with confirmed or suspected brain metastasis or active leptomeningeal metastasis.
  • Subject with a history of malignant tumor other than prostate cancer in the past 5 years.
  • Subject hypersensitive to the ingredients of enzalutamide capsules or flutamide tablets.
  • Subject with a history of convulsive attack, or prone to convulsive attack.
  • Subject with liver disorder such as viral hepatitis and hepatic cirrhosis, or subject with Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at screening visit higher than the upper limit of normal.
  • Subject received treatment for prostate cancer with cytocidal chemotherapy that includes anti androgenic agents other than bicalutamide, abiraterone, or estramustine.

Treatment and study plan

Enzalutamide

Drug

Oral Capsule

Other names: Xtandi, MDV3100

flutamide

Drug

Oral tablet

Androgen Deprivation Therapy

Other

All subjects must undergo continuous Androgen deprivation therapy with GnRH agonist/antagonist or bilateral orchiectomy during the study period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to PSA Progression With 1st Line AAT (TTPP1)

    Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of PSA progression in the 1st line AAT period (Up to 38 months)

    TTPP1 was defined as the period from the date of randomization to the date of PSA progression in the 1st line AAT period. PSA progression was defined according to the consensus guidelines of prostate cancer clinical trials working group 2 (PCWG2). For participants with PSA declines at week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir were documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later. For participants with no PSA decline at week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the baseline were documented. Time to event analysis was performed using kaplan-meier (KM) estimates.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to PSA Progression With 2nd Line AAT (TTPP2)

    Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of PSA progression in 2nd line AAT (Up to 38 months)

    TTPP2 was defined as the period from day 1 of the 2nd line AAT to the date of PSA progression with the 2nd line AAT. PSA progression was defined according to the consensus guidelines of PCWG2. For participants with PSA declines at week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir were documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later. For participants with no PSA decline at week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the baseline were documented. Time to event analysis was performed using kaplan-meier estimates.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 or 90 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline and Up To Week 38 in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response at 1st Line AAT

    Time frame: Baseline and at least 3 weeks after, the lowest PSA decreased by at least 50% or 90% from baseline (Up to 38 months)

    PSA response was defined as PSA decreased by at least 50% or 90% from baseline when at least 3 weeks passed after the lowest PSA decreased by at least 50% or 90% from baseline in the 1st line AAT period after baseline.

    Data was reported per each disease stage (M0/N0, M0/N1, M1). 1) M0/N0: No distant metastasis and no lymph node metastasis. 2) M0/N1: Without distant metastasis, but with metastasis in lymph nodes distal to the aortic bifurcation. 3) M1: With distant metastasis (including metastasis in lymph nodes proximal to the aortic bifurcation).

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 or 90 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline to Week 13 in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response at 1st Line AAT

    Time frame: Baseline and week 13

    PSA response was defined as the lowest PSA at week 13 decreased by at least 50% or 90% from baseline in the 1st line AAT period.

    Data was reported per each disease stage (M0/N0, M0/N1, M1). 1) M0/N0: No distant metastasis and no lymph node metastasis. 2) M0/N1: Without distant metastasis, but with metastasis in lymph nodes distal to the aortic bifurcation. 3) M1: With distant metastasis (including metastasis in lymph nodes proximal to the aortic bifurcation).

  4. Time to PSA Decrease by 50% From Baseline With 1st Line AAT

    Time frame: From date of randomization to the day when the decrease of PSA from baseline by 50% is first identified (Up to 38 months)

    Time to PSA decrease by 50% with 1st line AAT was defined as the period from the date of randomization to the day when the decrease of PSA from baseline by 50% is first identified. Time to event analysis was performed using kaplan-meier estimates.

    Data was reported per each disease stage (M0/N0, M0/N1, M1). 1) M0/N0: No distant metastasis and no lymph node metastasis. 2) M0/N1: Without distant metastasis, but with metastasis in lymph nodes distal to the aortic bifurcation. 3) M1: With distant metastasis (including metastasis in lymph nodes proximal to the aortic bifurcation).

  5. Time to Treatment Failure of 1st Line AAT (TTF1)

    Time frame: From date of randomization to discontinuation of 1st line AAT (Up to 38 months)

    TTF1 was defined as the period from randomization to study drug discontinuation of 1st line AAT for any reason that includes disease progression, onset of adverse events (AEs), participants request, or death. Time to event analysis was performed using kaplan-meier estimates.

    Data was reported per each disease stage (M0/N0, M0/N1, M1). 1) M0/N0: No distant metastasis and no lymph node metastasis. 2) M0/N1: Without distant metastasis, but with metastasis in lymph nodes distal to the aortic bifurcation. 3) M1: With distant metastasis (including metastasis in lymph nodes proximal to the aortic bifurcation).

  6. Time to Treatment Failure of 2nd Line AAT (TTF2)

    Time frame: From date of randomization to discontinuation of 2nd line AAT (Up to 38 months)

    TTF2 was defined as the period from randomization to study drug discontinuation of 2nd line AAT for any reason that includes disease progression, onset of AEs, participants request, or death. Time to event analysis was performed using kaplan-meier estimates.

  7. Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

    Time frame: From date of randomization to the time when radiographic disease progression is observed or death of any cause (up to 38 months)

    rPFS was defined as the period from randomization to the time when radiographic disease progression is observed or death of any cause during the study period, whichever occurs earlier. Time to event analysis was performed using kaplan-meier estimates.

    Data was reported per each disease stage (M0/N0, M0/N1, M1). 1) M0/N0: No distant metastasis and no lymph node metastasis. 2) M0/N1: Without distant metastasis, but with metastasis in lymph nodes distal to the aortic bifurcation. 3) M1: With distant metastasis (including metastasis in lymph nodes proximal to the aortic bifurcation).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Astellas Pharma Inc

Industry

Collaborators

  • Pfizer

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Phase IV Study Comparing Enzalutamide Versus Flutamide in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Patients Who Have Failed Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy With Bicalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 29, 2016
Registry last updated
Dec 9, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.