Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05793502

Study on Effectiveness and Safety of LBBaP With Solia S and Selectra 3D Developed by BIOTRONIK

This study is aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of LBBaP with Solia S and Selectra 3D in the Chinese population by analyzing the operation success rate and the system stability during follow-up visits.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital

Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

XIAOMING LI

CONTACT

About this study

Traditional ventricular pacing leads are placed in and around the right ventricular apex (RVA), which are easy to operate. The long-term safety and efficacy of right ventricular pacing (RVP) in the treatment of bradycardia arrhythmia have been demonstrated. However, it is shown by CTOPP (Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing) study (1), MOST (Micro-Optical Sectioning Tomography) study (2) and UKPACE (United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events) study (3) that long-term and high-proportion right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) may lead to ventricular systolic asynchrony, and accordingly increase the risks of cardiac failure (cardiac insufficiency) and atrial fibrillation (AF).

The concept of His bundle pacing (HBP) has been put forward for a long time, in which His bundle is directly stimulated to synchronously excite the ventricles mainly through the conduction of the His-Purkinje system (HPS) in the electrical activity of the heart. The study performed by Vijayaman et al. (4) shows that HBP can reduce the long-term mortality and the risks of hospitalization for cardiac failure and upgrading to CRT compared with the traditional RVAP. However, HBP surgery has the following disadvantages: (1) It is rather difficult to fix the leads, the operation duration is long, the suture removal duration is long, and the learning curve of doctors is long; (2) The threshold value is high during implantation and may further increase in the long term, and the sensory power is rather low. Therefore, the implantation of spare leads is recommended in relevant guidelines, increasing the hardware burden in patients; (3) The implantation site of patients with conduction block below His bundle is rather difficult or unable to cross the block site.

In order to improve the HBP surgery, Chinese doctors have put forward LBBaP in recent years, arousing widespread concern all over the world. Dedicated sheath tubes and electrode leads are adopted in the technique. Specifically, electrode leads are "screwed" into the left bundle branch area under the left ventricular intima from the right ventricular septum (RVS), and the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is performed to improve bradycardia. Compared with HBP, LBBP has the following advantages: (1) As the implantation site is easier to locate, the operation difficulty is reduced; (2) With a lower and more stable threshold, the sensitivity is better; (3) Distal block is corrected; (4) An enough space is left for atrioventricular junction ablation.

At present, it is collectively known as HBP in the international community. LBBaP refers to conduction system pacing, the performing of which depends on dedicated tools or instruments. In early times, the positioning and fixation of shaping steel wires in combination with active-fixation leads adopted in the technique were realized with the aid of a mapping catheter. The operation success rate of HBP was rather low and LBBaP could not be realized. With the introduction of dedicated sheath tubes by various manufacturers, the operation success rate has been greatly improved. However, there are no enough data derived from large-scale studies at home and abroad on the effectiveness and safety of LBBaP with Selectra 3D and Solia S developed by BIOTRONIK at present.

This study is aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of LBBaP with Solia S and Selectra 3D in the Chinese population by analyzing the operation success rate and the system stability during follow-up visits.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients for whom it is the first time to receive permanent pacemaker implantation or CRT, and on whom LBBaP will be performed for trial.
  • Willingness to participate in the investigation and sign the ICF
  • Ability and willingness to perform all follow-up visits at the investigation sites

Exclusion criteria

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Patients with cardiac amyloidosis
  • Patients with ventricular hypertrophy (interventricular septum diastolic thickness measured from two-dimensional echocardiography: ≥ 15 mm; or, interventricular septum diastolic thickness for patients with a definite family history: ≥ 13 mm)
  • Participating in other intervention clinical trials
  • Life-expectancy less than one year
  • Pregnancy and/or breast feeding

Treatment and study plan

Solia S and Selectra 3D Developed by BIOTRONIK

Device

LBBaP with Solia S and Selectra 3D Developed by BIOTRONIK

Primary outcomes

  1. Implantation success rate of LBBaP

    Time frame: During the surgery

    Implantation success rate of LBBaP

  2. Intraoperatively, the incidence of serious adverse events for devices associated with Solia S and Selectra 3D implantation rate

    Time frame: During the surgery

    Intraoperatively, the incidence of serious adverse events for devices associated with Solia S and Selectra 3D implantation rate

  3. Occurrence of serious adverse events rate

    Time frame: From the time of surgery to the 12-month post-implantation visit

    The incidence of serious adverse events associated with permanent pacemaker implantation or cardiac resynchronization from the time of surgery to the 12-month post-implantation visit Incidence of serious adverse events associated with the treatment procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with abnormal pacing parameters and abnormal ECG readings

    Time frame: 1 month and 12 months post-procedure

    Assessment of the consistency of pacing parameters and ECG characteristics at 1 month and 12 months postoperatively

  2. Changes of cardiac ultrasound values (including LVEF, LVESD and LVEDD)

    Time frame: 12 months post-procedure.

    At the 12-month follow-up, a cardiac ultrasound was performed, and the primary measurements included LVEF, LVESD, and LVEDD, comparing changes in LVEF, LVESD, and LVEDD at the 12-month follow-up with those prior to hospital discharge

  3. Changes of NYHA class

    Time frame: 1 month and 12 months post-procedure

    The extent of change in NYHA classification and number of subjects at 1 and 12 months postoperatively.

  4. Changes of EQ-5D-5L assessment

    Time frame: 1 month and 12 months post-procedure

    Extent of change in EQ-5D-5L assessment at 1 and 12 months postoperatively

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Chen Keping, Doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

13811266140 ext. +86

Li Jie, Bachelor

CONTACT

[email protected]

13811266140 ext. +86

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 31, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 26, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.