Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04327024

Study of Verinurad in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

International, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active Control Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Verinurad combined with Allopurinol in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–130 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Research Site, CABA, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Evidence shows independent associations between hyperuricaemia and the risk of cardio-renal conditions, including heart failure (HF). Serum uric acid (sUA) is also a strong prognostic factor and correlates with other markers of poor prognosis in HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and an estimated 1/2-2/3 of HFpEF patients have hyperuricaemia. HFpEF is a microvascular disease likely partly driven by endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in coronary vessel walls. Uric acid crystals have been identified in coronary vessel walls in some hyperuricaemic patients.

Uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) is responsible for reabsorption of uric acid (UA) in the proximal tubule. Inhibition of URAT1 results in increased urinary excretion of UA and lowering of uric acid in the blood. Verinurad is a novel URAT1 inhibitor in Phase 2 development for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and HF. Verinurad combined with the xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitors (XOI) febuxostat or allopurinol has been shown to lower sUA in patients with recurrent gout in Phase 2 studies by up to approximately 80%.

The primary objective of this Phase 2 study is to assess the effect of a combination of verinurad and allopurinol on exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF.

The secondary objectives are to assess effect of combination of verinurad and allopurinol in comparison to allopurinol monotheraphy on excercise capacity dwhich will be measured in peak VO2 as well as effect of verinurad and allopurinol compared to placebo and to allopurinol monotheraphy on Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire (KCCQ)-total symptom score (TSS). A sub-study aims to investigate the relationship between UA crystals and inflammation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient must be ≥ 40 years of age at the time of signing the ICF
  • Patients with hyperuricaemia defined as sUA level of > 6 mg/dL.
  • Patients with documented diagnosis of symptomatic HFpEF according to all of the following criteria:
  • Have NYHA functional class II-III at enrolment
  • Have medical history of typical symptoms/signs of HF > 6 weeks before enrolment
  • LVEF ≥ 45%
  • NT-proBNP ≥ 125 pg/mL (≥ 14.75 pmol/L) at Visit 1 for patients without ongoing atrial fibrillation/flutter.
  • Patients able to exercise to near exhaustion during a CPET as exhibited by RER

≥ 1.05 during CPET conducted during screening. If patient does not achieve RER ≥ 1.05 the CPET may be repeated once, at least 48 hours but less than 2 weeks (but before randomisation) after the initial test; in such cases the second test will serve as baseline.

  • Male or female

Exclusion criteria

  • eGFR < 30ml/min/1.73m2 (based on CKD-EPI formula)
  • Presence of any condition that precludes exercise testing
  • Known history of a documented LVEF < 40%
  • Probable alternative or concomitant diagnoses which in the opinion of the Investigator could account for the patient's HF symptoms and signs (eg, anaemia, hypothyroidism)
  • Known carrier of the Human Leukocyte Antigen-B (HLA-B) *58:01 allele: HLA-B

*58:01 genotyping is mandatory prior to randomization for all patients.

  • Patients diagnosed with tumor lysis syndrome or Lesch-Nyhan syndrome
  • Patients who are severely physically or mentally incapacitated and who in the opinion of investigator are unable to perform the patients' tasks associated with the protocol
  • Presence of any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, places the patient at undue risk or potentially jeopardises the quality of the data to be generated
  • Current acute decompensated HF or hospitalisation due to decompensated HF < 4 weeks prior to enrolment
  • Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting), ablation of atrial flutter/fibrillation, valve repair/replacement, implantation of a cardiac resynchronisation therapy device, stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to enrolment.
  • Planned coronary revascularisation, ablation of atrial flutter/fibrillation and/or valve repair/replacement
  • Atrial fibrillation with persistent resting heart rate > 110 beats per minute.

Treatment and study plan

Verinurad

Drug

The treatment will be titrated in 3 steps for target low dose (3 mg), intermediate dose (7.5 mg) and high dose (12mg) of verinurad.

Drug: Allopurinol The treatment will be titrated in 3 steps. Low dose (100mg), intermediate (200mg) and high dose (300mg) of allopurinol.

Other names: verinurad titration 3 - 7.5 - 12mg, allopurinol titration 100 - 200 - 300 mg

Allopurinol

Drug

Study treatments will be titrated in 3 steps: Low dose (100mg), intermediate (200mg) and high dose (300mg) of allopurinol

Other names: allopurinol titration 100 - 200 - 300 mg

Placebo for Verinurad

Drug

Matching Capsule

Other names: Placebo

Placebo for Allopurinol

Drug

Matching tablet

Other names: Placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline at Week 32 in Peak V02 Consumption in Verinurad + Allopurinol Compared to Placebo (ANCOVA Model)

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 32

    Mean change from baseline in peak VO2 at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and baseline peak VO2 included as covariate.

    H0: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs placebo) = 0 Ha: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs placebo) ≠ 0

    A hierarchical test sequence was used for the confirmatory analysis of the primary and secondary objectives in order to address the issue of multiple testing and control the Type I error rate at an overall two-sided 0.05 level.

    Since this was the first test in the hierarchical test sequence and endpoint was not rejected at a two-sided 0.05 level, the testing sequence did not continue.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline at Week 32 in Peak V02 Consumption in Verinurad+ Allopurinol Compared to Allopurinol Monotherapy (ANCOVA Model)

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 32

    Mean change from baseline in peak VO2 at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and baseline peak VO2 included as covariate.

    H0: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs allopurinol) = 0 Ha: Difference in mean change from baseline in peak VO2 (verinurad + allopurinol vs allopurinol) ≠ 0

    A hierarchical test sequence was used for the confirmatory analysis of the primary and secondary objectives in order to address the issue of multiple testing and control the Type I error rate at an overall two-sided 0.05 level.

  2. Change From Baseline at Week 32 in KCCQ-TSS in Verinurad+ Allopurinol Compared to Placebo (MMRM)

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 22 and Week 32

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item assessment that measures the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure-related symptoms (frequency, burden, recent change), impact on physical and social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and how the patient's heart failure affects their quality of life. The Total Symptom Score (TSS) averages the frequency domain and the symptom burden domain subscales, which each range from 0 to 100. The TSS ranges from 0-100 (higher scores = better health status).

    Mean change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using MMRM analysis, with change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and visit, visit by treatment, and baseline KCCQ-TSS included as covariates.

    The number analyzed at each timepoint represents the number of subjects with data at each visit.

  3. Change From Baseline at Week 32 in KCCQ-TSS in Verinurad+ Allopurinol Compared to Allopurinol Monotherapy (MMRM)

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 22 and Week 32

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item assessment that measures the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure-related symptoms (frequency, burden, recent change), impact on physical and social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and how the patient's heart failure affects their quality of life. The Total Symptom Score (TSS) averages the frequency domain and the symptom burden domain subscales, which each range from 0 to 100. The TSS ranges from 0-100 (higher scores = better health status).

    Mean change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS at Week 32 between the treatment groups was compared using MMRM analysis, with change from baseline (i.e., week 32 value - baseline value) as the dependent variable, treatment as the independent variable and visit, visit by treatment, and baseline KCCQ-TSS included as covariates.

    The number analyzed at each timepoint represents the number of subjects with data at each visit.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active Control Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Verinurad Combined With Allopurinol in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Acronym: AMETHYST

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 30, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.