Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00771264

Study of Urgent PC Versus Sham Effectiveness in Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate superiority of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) therapy compared to sham therapy for the treatment of patients with overall bladder (OAB) symptoms.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Gregory L. Davis, M.D., FACOG, Inc., Chico, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women and men >18 years of age
  • A score of > 4 on the OAB-q short form for urgency (question 1)
  • Average urinary frequency > 10 times in one 24 hour day based on a 3-day voiding diary
  • Self-reported bladder symptoms present > 3 months
  • Self-reported failed conservative care (i.e., dietary restriction, fluid restriction, bladder training, behavioral modification, pelvic muscle training, biofeedback, etc.)
  • Off all antimuscarinics for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Capable of giving informed consent
  • Ambulatory and able to use a toilet independently, without difficulty
  • Capable and willing to follow all study-related procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant as confirmed by urine pregnancy test, or plans to become pregnant during the study period
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Botox use in bladder or pelvic floor muscles in the past year
  • Pacemakers or implantable defibrillators
  • Primary complaint of stress urinary incontinence
  • Current urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Current vaginal infection
  • Current use of InterStim
  • Current use of Bion
  • Current use of TENS in the pelvic region, back or legs
  • Previously been treated with PTNS
  • Use of investigational drug/device therapy within the past 4 weeks
  • Participating or have participated within the past 4 weeks in any clinical investigation involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function
  • Deemed unsuitable for enrollment in study by the investigators based on subjects' history or physical examination (including bleeding disorders or anticoagulant medications, and peripheral neuropathy)
  • Subjects with nerve damage that would impact either percutaneous tibial nerve or pelvic floor function

Treatment and study plan

Urgent PC Neuromodulation System

Device

The Urgent PC Neuromodulation System is a minimally invasive neuromodulation system designed to deliver retrograde access to the sacral nerve through percutaneous electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve. The method of treatment is referred to as Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS).

Primary outcomes

  1. The Global Response Assessment (GRA) for Overall Bladder Symptoms to Compare the Proportion of Subjects Reporting "Moderately" or "Markedly Improved" Responses on the GRA After 12 Interventions of Randomized Therapy, in an Intent to Treat Analysis.

    Time frame: 13 weeks

    A responder was defined as reporting bladder symptoms as moderately or markedly improved on a 7-level GRA at week 13 after completing 12, 30-minute, consecutive weekly intervention sessions.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Uroplasty, Inc

Industry

Registry information

Acronym: SUmiT

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Oct 13, 2008
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.