Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
NCT Number: NCT07305051
This research study will compare two ultrasound methods for assessing the inferior vena cava (IVC), a major vein that reflects intravascular fluid status and cardiac function before and after surgery. The standard method uses a subcostal ultrasound view obtained below the breastbone, but this approach may be limited in patients with obesity, surgical dressings, or postoperative discomfort. An alternative approach, the transhepatic view, uses the liver as an acoustic window and may provide improved feasibility in these situations.
The study will evaluate whether the transhepatic view provides measurements comparable to the standard subcostal view and whether operators with different levels of ultrasound experience obtain consistent results using both methods. Adult patients who are awake and scheduled for cardiac surgery at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre will undergo a brief ultrasound examination before surgery. The scan takes less than 10 minutes, involves no discomfort, and does not alter clinical care. This is a minimal-risk observational study with no therapeutic interventions. Participation is voluntary, and all personal health information will remain confidential. Findings may inform future approaches to ultrasound-guided assessment and training in perioperative care.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Respiratory variation in inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter is a widely accepted non-invasive marker of intravascular volume status and fluid responsiveness, particularly in spontaneously breathing patients. Among transthoracic echocardiographic windows, this variation is most commonly assessed using the subcostal (SC) view, which is considered the clinical reference standard due to its direct acoustic pathway and extensive validation in research and clinical practice. The physiologic basis for this measure is strongest in the context of spontaneous respiration, where negative intrathoracic pressure significantly influences venous return dynamics. For this reason, the study population is limited to spontaneously breathing patients to ensure physiologic consistency and interpretive validity.
The SC view, however, may be limited by factors such as body habitus, postoperative dressings, or an obstructed subxiphoid window. The transhepatic (TH) view has been proposed as a complementary or alternative approach, providing an oblique acoustic window through the liver that facilitates visualization of the IVC long axis. Several observational studies have reported strong correlation and agreement between TH and SC measurements of IVC diameter and collapsibility, including in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients. Despite these promising findings, prior studies have been constrained by small sample sizes, heterogeneous methodologies, and limited assessment of reproducibility-particularly across operators with different levels of ultrasound experience. These gaps underscore the need for a larger, methodologically rigorous validation study.
The primary objective of this prospective, single-center observational study is to evaluate agreement between the SC and TH views using methodological standards aligned with diagnostic accuracy frameworks such as QUADAS-2, in a larger cohort of patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. The secondary objective is to assess interrater reliability of TH and SC IVC measurements obtained by novice and expert sonographers. The results are intended to strengthen the evidence base supporting the use of the transhepatic view in perioperative care and to inform future training, competency assessment, and quality-assurance processes in point-of-care ultrasound.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Preoperative period, within twenty-four to forty-eight hours before cardiac surgery.
Outcome Metric: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the collapsibility index (unitless).
Rationale: To determine agreement between transhepatic and subcostal cIVC measurements.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Metric: ICC(2,1) for cIVC (unitless).
Rationale: To assess reproducibility between novice and expert sonographers.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Metrics: ICC for IVC maximum diameter (millimetres). Rationale: To determine whether transhepatic and subcostal measurements of IVC maximum diameter demonstrate sufficient agreement to support interchangeable use of the two ultrasound views for this parameter.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Outcome Metric:
Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement for the IVC diameter ratio (unitless).
Rationale:
To assess systematic bias and variability in the ratio of IVC maximum to minimum diameter across the two ultrasound views, offering an additional perspective on agreement in dynamic IVC behavior.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Outcome Metric:
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for IVC minimum diameter (millimetres).
Rationale:
To evaluate the agreement between transhepatic and subcostal measurements of IVC minimum diameter, which contributes to understanding the consistency of static diameter assessment across imaging windows.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Outcome Metric:
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the ratio of IVC maximum to IVC minimum diameter (unitless).
Rationale:
To assess agreement for the proportional relationship between maximum and minimum IVC diameters, providing additional information on dynamic venous diameter behavior across ultrasound views.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Outcome Metric:
Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement for the collapsibility index (unitless).
Rationale:
To quantify systematic bias and random variation between transhepatic and subcostal collapsibility index measurements, complementing correlation-based agreement metrics.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Outcome Metric:
Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement for IVC maximum diameter (millimeters).
Rationale:
To characterize systematic differences and dispersion between transhepatic and subcostal measurements of IVC maximum diameter, informing clinical interpretability of any observed discrepancies.
Time frame: Preoperative period, during the same imaging session.
Outcome Metric:
Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement for IVC minimum diameter (millimeters).
Rationale:
To evaluate the magnitude and spread of measurement differences in IVC minimum diameter between transhepatic and subcostal views, providing a detailed assessment of potential measurement error.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ignacio Erbetta, MD
CONTACT
Lilia Kaustov, MSc, PhD
CONTACT
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Other
Comparison of Transhepatic and Subcostal Views for Assessing Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Variation in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Acronym: THRIVE-CARD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04728178
Perioperative Fluid Management
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02337010
Major Abdominal Surgery, Pathologic Processes
Szeged, Csongrád megye, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT07692139
End Tidal Carbon Dioxide, Hemodynamic Monitoring
View Trial DetailsNCT07730684
Breathing Exercises, Cardiac Surgery Patients
Aydin, Aydın, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details