Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07395076

Study of the Immunological Pathophysiological Mechanisms Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

About 10% of patients admitted to the ICU suffer from ARDS, with a mortality rate of around 35-45%. The lack of therapeutic innovation in ARDS can be partly explained by the heterogeneity of patients included under this definition.

A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the different patient phenotypes is essential to develop new therapeutic strategies.

Objectives:

To characterize the inflammatory profile of patients with ARDS using circulating biomarkers and single-cell RNA sequencing of pulmonary immune cells.

The investigators hypothesize that there is a correlation between the profile of serum biomarkers (inflammatory sub-phenotypes), the transcriptome of pulmonary immune cells.

Briefly the experimental scheme is as follow:

* Population: patients with ARDS under invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU. * Intervention:

1. Determination of the inflammatory subphenotype on circulatory inflammatory biomarkers. 2. Characterization of inflammation by single cell RNA sequencing on lung immune cells collected on broncho-alveolar fluid.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

About this study

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe form of pulmonary failure. It is defined by bilateral radiologic opacities associated with severe hypoxemia, confirmed by a PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio <300 in the absence of a cardiac cause. About 10% of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Units (ICU) develop ARDS, and this diagnosis is associated with an in-hospital mortality of 35-45%. Like sepsis, ARDS leads to long-term complications. It is associated with physical deconditioning and reduced quality of life that can persist up to five years after the episode. Survivors are readmitted to the ICU within a year in 30% of cases. Moreover, excess mortality among ARDS survivors is attributable, in nearly one-third of cases, to a new acute respiratory infection.

The lack of therapeutic advances in ARDS has led researchers to better characterize patients with this condition. Different subphenotypes have been identified based on plasma inflammatory biomarker profiles, which are associated with distinct responses to treatments (such as corticosteroids, ventilatory management, and fluid management) and variable prognoses. The mechanisms underlying these different biological subphenotypes remain unknown. To further explore this concept, it is necessary to precisely identify subpopulations of patients who present with similar clinical features but distinct biological phenotypes driven by unique pathophysiological mechanisms. Establishing these different ARDS endotypes is essential for the development of innovative and targeted therapeutic strategies.

Our hypothesis is that the different biological subphenotypes of ARDS reflect distinct profiles of pulmonary immune cell populations, representing a first step toward understanding ARDS endotypes.

Identifying these endotypes is a crucial step for developing targeted and innovative therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing ARDS-related morbidity and mortality. This is the objective of the proposed project.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ARDS risk factors: bacterial or viral pneumonia, extrapulmonary infection, major trauma, transfusion, inhalation injury, or shock.
  • Pulmonary edema not explained by a cardiogenic cause or volume overload.
  • Onset of respiratory symptoms within <7 days.
  • Bilateral pulmonary involvement on chest X-ray, CT scan, or ultrasound.
  • PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 300 assessed with PEEP ≥ 5 cmH₂O.

Exclusion criteria

  • ARDS with intubation for more than 48 hours.
  • Contraindications to bronchoscopy: effective anticoagulation, dual antiplatelet therapy, thrombocytopenia <50 G/L.
  • Pre-existing immunodeficiency: active solid tumor or remission <5 years, active hematologic malignancy or remission <5 years, systemic disease (even without specific treatment), solid organ or bone marrow transplant, HIV infection with CD4 <200/mm³.
  • Cardiac arrest with a poor prognosis (NSE >60, malignant EEG, diffuse ischemia on imaging, loss of trunk reflexes).
  • Patients <18 year-old
  • Patients under legal guardianship, curatorship, or deprived of liberty.
  • Ongoing pregnancy.
  • Patients without social security coverage.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Single cell RNA sequencing of pulmonary immune cells

    Time frame: At baseline

    Single cell RNA sequencing of pulmonary immune cells collected during a bronchoalveolar lavage at inclusion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Time frame: At day 90

    Mortality rate at day 90

  2. Mortality

    Time frame: 1 year

    Mortality rate at one year

  3. Time without respiratory support

    Time frame: At day 28

    Number of days alive without mechanical ventilation on day 28 after inclusion or on discharge from intensive care if this occurs before the 28th day

  4. Length of stay in intensive care

    Time frame: From inclusion to ICU discharge up to 1 year

    Number of days in intensive care.

  5. Number of secondary infections

    Time frame: At day 90

    Rate of secondary infections defined as a new prescription of antibiotics

  6. Number of secondary infections

    Time frame: 1 year

    Rate of secondary infections defined as a new prescription of antibiotics

  7. Impact perceived on quality of life

    Time frame: At day 90

    Quality of life assessed though the SF-12 questionnaire on the phone.

  8. Impact perceived on quality of life

    Time frame: 1 year

    Rate of secondary infections defined as a new prescription of antibiotics

  9. Dsypnea scale

    Time frame: At day 90

    Dyspnea scale assessed through mMRC questionnaire on the phone

  10. Dsypnea scale

    Time frame: 1 year

    Dyspnea scale assessed through mMRC questionnaire on the phone

  11. Organ failure

    Time frame: At baseline

    SOFA score assessment

  12. Organ failure

    Time frame: At day 7.

    SOFA score assessment

  13. Need for vasopressor

    Time frame: At baseline

    Need for vasopressor (epinephrine or norepinephrine)

  14. Vasopressor free days

    Time frame: At day 28 or at discharge from intensive care

    Number of days alive without vasopressors on day 28 after inclusion or on discharge from intensive care if this occurs before the 28th day.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Benjamin Chousterman, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+330149958518

Pierre-Louis BLOT, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+331049956565

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Registry information

Acronym: IMMUNORESP2

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
Registry last updated
May 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.