The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
NCT Number: NCT03902691
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effecacy and safety of dialysis centers switching its dialysis patients from using recombinant human erythropoietin injection (CHO Cell) (ESPO) to Pegol-Sihematide injection on hemoglobin levels and other parameters.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
This is a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of from ESPO to monthly Pegol-Sihematide injection for the treatment of anemia in participants with chronic kidney disease(CKD), who are on maintenance dialysis. Study included a period of 4 weeks for screening, 8 weeks for baseline, 16 weeks for dose adjustment, 8 weeks for evaluation, and 28 weeks for extensional treatment period. All patients who passed the screening were received ESPO in baseline period, then, eligible patients were centrally allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive Pegol-Sihematide or ESPO. Doses of both drugs were adjusted to achieve and maintain hemoglobin levels between 10.0 and 12.0 g per deciliter for 52 weeks or more. The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from the baseline hemoglobin level to the mean level during the evaluation period; non-inferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was -1.0 g per deciliter or higher. Cardiovascular safety was evaluated on the basis of an adjudicated composite end point.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants received Pegol-Sihematide by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks ; the dose was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 10.0-12.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL).
Participants received ESPO by subcutaneous injection or subcutaneous injection weekly. The dose was adjusted throughout the study to maintain a hemoglobin target range of 10.0-12.0 g/dL.
Time frame: Week 17-24
The primary efficacy end point is the mean change from the baseline hemoglobin level to the mean level during the evaluation period. The baseline hemoglobin value is defined as the mean of three hemoglobin values: the 4 weeks and 2 weeks recent hemoglobin values taken prior to the day of randomization and the value obtained on the day of randomization. The mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period was calculated as the mean of all available hemoglobin values during that period. Hemoglobin measurements will be performed at baseline and thereafter every 2 weeks (for the dose adjustment and the evaluation periods) or every 4 weeks (for the extensional treatment period).
Time frame: Week 17-24
The hemoglobin value within ±1.0 g/dL of baseline is defined as the difference between the hemoglobin value and the baseline value in the 4 tests in the Evaluation Period was at least 3 times between 1.0g /dL. The Evaluation Period is defined as study weeks 17 through 24.
Time frame: Week 17-24
Mean dose was calculated at least 3 times from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period (Week 17 to Week 24).
Time frame: Week 17-24
The hemoglobin value within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the evaluation period is defined as HGB values were between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL in at least 3 of the 4 tests in the efficacy evaluation period.
Time frame: Week 0-52
The baseline hemoglobin value is defined as the mean of three hemoglobin values: the 4 weeks and 2 weeks recent hemoglobin values taken prior to the day of randomization and the value obtained on the day of randomization.
Time frame: Week 0-52
The incidence of patients who reported serious adverse events (SAE)
Time frame: Week 0-52
The incidence of patients with risk cardiovascular events, The CSE consisted of five events: death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and serious adverse events of congestive heart failure and unstable angina. An independent Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) was used to provide blinded adjudication of potential CSE events.
Time frame: Week 17-24
The incidence of patients with antibody to Pegol-Sihematide.
Jiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multicenter, Non-Inferiority Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pegol-Sihematide for Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease on Dialysis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03386539
Behavior, Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03938324
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06071143
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Daejeon, Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05033652
Acute Kidney Injury, Chronic Disease
Alès, France
View Trial Details