Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01763242

Study of the Effect of Synchronised Anaemia Management in Chronic Kidney Disease

Aims:

1. To establish an electronic process for CKD anaemia management using monthly synchronized dosing of erythrocyte stimulating agents (ESA). 2. To compare this electronic process with "present anaemia management" in the traditional outpatient setting. 3. To monitor Hb targets and clinical endpoints of study groups to model a larger multicentre study focusing on these endpoints.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

CKD Stages 3 to 5 Subjects will be randomised and stratified according to Age, Gender, CKD Stage, Known Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes and ESA Type into EMAN vs. Control

Details of EMAN synchronization and Dosing:

Monthly dose of ESA is calculated by:

Monthly dose = present dose x (28/present frequency (days))

Synchronization will be achieved by using the formula: "Synchronization dose of ESA = (28-Days until next injection is due)/28 x monthly dose of ESA

The dose of ESA/C.E.R.A. should be adjusted to maintain the individual patient's haemoglobin within a range of 11± 1.0 g/dL of the reference haemoglobin concentration ie. between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL

Haemoglobin Value Corrective Adjustment

  • A single value >13 g/dL Interrupt treatment until Hb falls below 12 g/dL then re-start treatment at 50% of previous dose
  • A single value <9 g/dL Increase dose by 50%
  • Difference between two consecutive Hb values indicates ≥2 g/dL increase Reduce dose by 50%
  • Difference between two consecutive Hb values indicates ≥2 g/dL decrease Increase dose by 50%
  • >11.5 g/dL and <13 g/dL AND deviation from reference value is >1g/dL. Reduce dose by 25%
  • <10.5 g/dL and >9 g/dL AND deviation from reference value is >1g/dL. Increase dose by 25%
  • >12 g/dL Reduce dose by 25%
  • <10 g/dL Increase dose by 25%

Statistics:

Audit of present practice suggests CKD patients achieve only 30% on target (Hb 10-12g/dL) while well audited dialysis units in our service can achieve 60% at target.

If an improvement from 30% to 60% is expected in the EMAN verses Control arm then 100 patients (50 in each group) would be required to show a significant difference p<0.05 with 85% power.

Patients will be analysed on an intention to treat basis Primary and Secondary Endpoint data will be compared between study and control groups using unpaired student t-tests after normalisation of data as required and/or chi squared analysis.

Statistical significance will be taken at p<0.05.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written informed consent
  • Age > 18 years
  • Chronic renal anaemia already on ESA therapy as defined by Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Significant acute bleeding such as overt gastrointestinal bleeding
  • A known haematological cause for anaemia
  • Known metastatic malignancy
  • Present participation in another interventional clinical trial • Known hypersensitivity to recombinant human erythropoietin, polyethylene glycol or to any constituent of the study medication

Treatment and study plan

EMAN

Other

See details on ESA Synchronization and Dosing in Detailed Description Above

Other names: Synchronised Blood Testing, Electronic upload of Blood Results, Synchronised ESA dosing monthly, Home delivery of ESA

Primary outcomes

  1. Haemoglobin

    Time frame: 12 months

    Haemoglobin (Hb) Targets: % above/within/below target ; % Time Hb above/within/below Target ie. Hb 10 to 12g/dL.

Secondary outcomes

  1. All Cause Hospitalisation

    Time frame: 12 months

    Same day and Non Same Day Hospitalisation analysis, Total Hospitalisations

  2. Outpatient Review Numbers

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Primary Care review Numbers

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Cardiovascular Hospitalisation

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Cerebrovascular Hospitalisation

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Peripheral Vascular Hospitalisation

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Thrombosis Events

    Time frame: 12 months

    Venous and Arterial

  8. Renal Replacement Therapy Commencement

    Time frame: 12 months

    Dialysis and Renal transplantation

  9. Deaths

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Quality of Life

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Missed Doses of ESA

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Fe Targets

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Blood Transfusion Numbers

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Fe Transfusion Numbers

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Total Adverse Events

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Anaemia Co-Ordinator Time

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Pharmacy Time

    Time frame: 12 months

  18. Courier Costs

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. Ambulance Transfer Numbers

    Time frame: 12 months

  20. Cardiac and Vascular Biomarker Analysis

    Time frame: 12 months

    N Terminal Pro-Brain Natruretic Peptide, Interleukin-6, Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha, High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein

Other outcomes

  1. Sub-Analysis of Outcomes by ESA Type

    Time frame: 12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Western Health, Australia

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

EMAN-Anaemia: An Open Labelled Randomised Control Trial of the Synchronized Electronic MANagement of Anaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Compared to Usual Care Anaemia Management

Acronym: EMAN-Anaemia

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jan 8, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 8, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.