Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01126125

Study of the Effect of Iodized Oil Supplementation During Infancy

In iodine-deficient countries or regions that have inadequate iodized salt distribution, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends choosing one of two methods to improve iodine intakes in breastfeeding infants: 1) iodine supplement (400 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) to the breastfeeding mother, or 2) iodine supplement (100 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) directly to the infant. However, the relative efficacy of these two methods of providing iodine to the newborn has never been directly compared. Whether the first method of iodine supplementation to the breast feeding mother can significantly improve iodine supply and maintain normal thyroid function in her infant remains unclear. This study will directly compare these two strategies. The hypothesis is that the two strategies will be equally effective in providing iodine to the newborn.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

4 week–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Semilila Faculty of Sciences

Marrakesh, Marrakech, Morocco

About this study

In iodine-deficient countries or regions that have inadequate iodized salt distribution, WHO recommends choosing one of two methods to improve iodine intakes in breastfeeding infants:

Method 1) iodine supplement (400 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) to the breastfeeding mother Method 2) iodine supplement (100 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) directly to the infant

However, the relative efficacy of these two methods of providing iodine to the newborn has never been directly compared. Whether the first method of iodine supplementation to the breast feeding mother can significantly improve iodine supply and maintain normal thyroid function in her infant remains unclear.

The mountains of southern Morocco are areas of iodine deficiency. Although the government has been promoting iodization of salt, there are hundreds of small salt producers in the mountains who do not have the funding or infrastructure to iodize their salt, and thus many rural populations still are consuming non-iodized locally-produced salt. At the study site, a 2009 pilot survey of urinary iodine has found that the population in this region is moderately iodine sufficient.

Thus, according to WHO, breastfeeding women and/or their infants should be provided with oral iodine supplementation. But which of the above supplementation methods is preferable? Controlled studies clearly demonstrate that iodine repletion in moderate-to severely iodine deficient school-age children increases insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 concentrations and improves somatic growth (height and weight). But whether supplying adequate iodine to iodine deficient infants improves their somatic growth has not been tested.

Therefore, the study hypotheses are: In Moroccan infants who are breastfeeding, method 2 will be more efficacious than method 1 in:

  • increasing urinary iodine (UI) concentrations
  • improving thyroid function (TSH, TT4)
  • increasing IGF-1, IGFBP-3
  • improving somatic growth (length, weight, head circumference)

The study design will be a double-blind, randomized controlled intervention trial in southern Morocco lasting 1 year. Healthy mother-infant pairs (n=240) who are breastfeeding will be recruited while the infant is >1 mo of age. They will be divided into two groups as follows:

  • method 1: mother receives 400 mg of iodine as oral iodized oil + infant receives placebo capsule; or 2) method 2: mother receives placebo capsule + infant receives 100 mg oral iodized oil.

The outcomes will be:

  • length, weight, head circumference
  • IGF-1, IGFBP-3, thyroid functions (TSH, total T4) from a dried blood spot taken from a finger prick in the mothers/heel prick in the infants
  • urinary and breast milk iodine concentrations These samples (blood spot, urine, breastmilk, anthropometry) will be collected during the first year visits of the infant to the local health clinic for routine pediatric vaccinations (at 1, 12, 20 and 40-52 wks).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • breastfeeding term infant

Exclusion criteria

  • not breastfeeding
  • major medical illnesses

Treatment and study plan

Iodized oil

Dietary Supplement

400 mg of iodine vs 100 mg of iodine as iodized oil

Primary outcomes

  1. Infant height and weight

    Time frame: 1st year after birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Infant head circumference

    Time frame: 1st year after birth

  2. Thyroid hormone concentrations

    Time frame: 1st year after birth

  3. Urinary iodine concentrations

    Time frame: 1st year after birth

  4. Infant development score

    Time frame: 1st year after birth

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Iodized Oil Supplementation During Infancy

Acronym: INSIGHT

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
May 19, 2010
Registry last updated
Nov 8, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.