Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01104415

Study of Telotristat Etiprate (LX1606) in Participants With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of orally administered telotristat etiprate (LX1606) in participants with symptomatic carcinoid syndrome.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Lexicon Investigational Site, Bad Berka, Germany

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females, aged 18 and older
  • Biopsy-proven metastatic carcinoid tumor of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with disease extent confirmed by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or radionuclide imaging
  • Symptomatic carcinoid syndrome (≥4 bowel movements per day)
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • ≥ 12 high-volume, watery bowel movements per day
  • Sponsor-unacceptable clinical laboratory values for hematology and liver function tests at screening
  • Karnofsky status ≤70% - unable to care for self
  • Surgery within 60 days prior to screening
  • A history of short bowel syndrome
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • History of substance or alcohol abuse within 2 years prior to screening
  • Administration of any investigational drug within 30 days of screening or any therapeutic protein or antibody within 90 days of screening

Treatment and study plan

Telotristat etiprate

Drug

Telotristat etiprate capsules orally three times daily.

Other names: LX1606 Hippurate

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Core Phase

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12 in the Core Phase

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1.

  2. Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Extension Period

    Time frame: Up to 124 Weeks in the Extension Period

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Number of Bowel Movements (BMs)

    Time frame: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

    Participants recorded the number of bowel movements in a daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between mean numbers of BMs of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.

  2. Change From Baseline in Stool Form/Consistency

    Time frame: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

    Participants assessed stool form/consistency in a daily diary using a 6-point scale (0-none, 1-hard, 2-firm, 3-soft, 4-loose, 5-watery). The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between a mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score and 5 indicates the worst score. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.

  3. Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With Sensation of Urgency to Defecate

    Time frame: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

    Participants assessed the urgency to defecate using a daily diary response to the following question, "Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today?". The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score (percentage of days) of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.

  4. Change From Baseline in Sensation/Severity of Nausea Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

    Sensation/severity of nausea was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of nausea experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.

  5. Number of Participants With an Improvement in Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid Syndrome

    Time frame: Core Phase: Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Week 24

    Participants assessed their symptoms using a weekly subjective response to the following question, "In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain, or discomfort?". The values for improvement in global assessment of symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome in the Core Phase were averaged from Weeks 9 to 12.

  6. Change From Baseline in Daily Severity of Abdominal Pain or Discomfort Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

    The severity of abdominal pain was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of abdominal pain or experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicate the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.

  7. Change From Baseline in Daily Number of Cutaneous Flushing Episodes

    Time frame: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

    Participants recorded the number of daily cutaneous flushing episodes experienced in the daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean numbers of cutaneous flushing episodes of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.

  8. Number of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Symptom Reduction in the Core Phase

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Clinically meaningful symptom reduction was defined as either: a) an average of < 4 bowel movements per day over 15 consecutive days, b) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of bowel movements, c) a positive response to the question regarding adequate relief, or d) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of daily flushing episodes.

  9. Change From Baseline in Urinary 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (HIAA) Levels

    Time frame: Core Phase: Baseline to Week 12; Extension Period: Baseline to Weeks 20-21

    Urinary 5-HIAA (u5-HIAA) is a standard test used in clinical practice to assess the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) activity and is collected as a 24-hour urine specimen. The change from baseline value for the Extension Period was calculated as the difference between mean change in 5-HIAA of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 20 to 21) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Serial Ascending-Dose, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LX1606 in Subjects With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Apr 15, 2010
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.