Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00112294

Study of Taxane/Carboplatin +/- Cetuximab as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The primary purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if patients treated with the combination of Taxane/Carboplatin plus Cetuximab (C/T/C) have a longer progression-free survival than patients treated with Taxane/Carboplatin (T/C) alone. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Local Institution, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must have advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer that has not been previously treated with any chemotherapy.
  • Tumor/disease lesions that can be measured bidimensionally.
  • Must be able to carry-out work of light or sedentary nature (e.g. light house work, office work).
  • Adequate recovery from recent surgery or radiation therapy.
  • Must be at least 4 weeks from last major surgery or prior treatment with an investigational agent. At least 12 weeks from any radiation therapy to chest.
  • Accessible for treatment, follow-up and required visits at a participating center(s).

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer.
  • Prior treatment with cetuximab or other epidermal growth factor (EGFR)-targeted therapy.
  • Prior severe infusion reaction to antibody therapy.
  • Concurrent malignancy (previous malignancy without evidence of disease for 5 years will be allowed to enter trial).
  • Concurrent chemotherapy or therapy with another investigational agent not indicated in the protocol.
  • Serious uncontrolled medical disorders that would impair the ability to receive therapy.
  • History of myocardial infarction within prior 3 months, uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia, or uncontrolled congestive heart failure.
  • Symptomatic or uncontrolled metastases in the central nervous system. Subjects receiving a glucocorticoid for central nervous system (CNS) metastases are not eligible, but those receiving an anticonvulsant are eligible.
  • Peripheral neuropathy >= grade 2 (Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event [CTCAE] Version 3.0).
  • Inadequate hematologic and/or liver and/or kidney function.
  • Sexually active and fertile individuals or partners of these individuals who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of birth control for entire trial and up to 4 weeks after the study.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Women with a positive pregnancy test on enrollment prior to study drug administration.
  • Altered mental status or psychiatric condition that prohibits understanding or rendering of consent.

Treatment and study plan

Paclitaxel (Taxane)

Drug

IV, 225 mg/m^2

Docetaxel (Taxane)

Drug

IV, 75 mg/m^2

carboplatin

Drug

AUC=6, q 3 weeks (6 cycles maximum)

Cetuximab

Drug

Intravenous, 400 mg/m^2, initial dose followed by 250 mg/m^2, weekly starting on Week 2

Other names: Erbitux

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Number of Months of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last tumor assessment (up to 26 months).

    Interval between randomization date & earliest date of disease progression/death due to any cause, assessed by the Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) using modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to define progressive disease (PD): >=25% increase in sum of products of diameters (SOPD) of lesions compared with smallest SOPD recorded for study period or progression of any non-index lesion/appearance of new lesion. If no progression/death, date of last tumor assessment used. For participants who had no on-study tumor assessments & were still alive, date of randomization used.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

    Time frame: From randomization to end of study drug therapy (up to 174 weeks).

    Tumor response was defined as the number of participants whose best response was CR or PR, per the IRRC assessment, using the modified WHO criteria: CR: disappearance of all index/non-index lesions; PR: >= 50% reduction in the SOPD of index lesions compared with the baseline SOPD, with no evidence of progression. To qualify as CR or PR, no new lesions could be present.

  2. Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD)

    Time frame: From randomization to end of study drug therapy (up to 174 weeks).

    Disease control was defined as the number of participants whose best response was CR, PR, or SD, per the IRRC assessment, using the modified WHO criteria: CR: disappearance of all index/non-index lesions; PR:>= 50% reduction in the SOPD of index lesions compared with the baseline SOPD, with no evidence of progression (to qualify as CR or PR, no new lesions could be present); SD: participants who did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, or PD (PD:>=25% increase in SOPD of lesions compared with smallest SOPD recorded for study period or progression of any non-index lesion/appearance of new lesion).

  3. Median Number of Months of Response

    Time frame: Time from first occurrence of CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) to the date of PD, death or date of last tumor assessment (up to 19 months).

    Median number of months of response (time from first occurrence of CR/PR to date of PD/death, [per IRRC assessment,using modified WHO criteria]) calculated for participants whose best response=CR/PR.For participants who did not progress/die, date of last tumor assessment used.CR:disappearance of all index/non-index lesions;PR:>= 50% reduction in SOPD of index lesions compared with baseline, no evidence of progression.No new lesions present.PD:>=25% increase in SOPD of lesions compared with smallest SOPD recorded for study period or progression of any non-index lesion/appearance of new lesion.

  4. Median Number of Months to Response

    Time frame: Time from first dose of study therapy to the date of PR or CR, whichever occurred first (up to 13 months).

    The median number of months to response was calculated for participants whose best response was CR or PR. It was defined as the time from the first dose of study therapy to the first date that criteria for PR or CR (whichever occurred first)were met. Response was assessed by the IRRC, using the modified WHO criteria: CR: disappearance of all index/non-index lesions; PR: >= 50% reduction in the SOPD of index lesions compared with the baseline SOPD, with no evidence of progression. To qualify as CR or PR, no new lesions could be present.

  5. Median Number of Months of Survival

    Time frame: From randomization to death or date of last contact (up to 41 months).

    The median number of months of survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. For participants who did not die, the date of last contact was used.

  6. Number of Participants With Improvement of Symptoms

    Time frame: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last symptom assessment (up to 33 weeks).

    Symptoms were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung Cancer Subscale (FACT-LCS) questionnaire. This 7-item scale has scores ranging from 0 (severely symptomatic in all symptoms assessed) to 28 (symptom-free on all symptoms assessed). Symptom response (improvement) was defined as >= 2-point increase from baseline in score (maintained for 2 consecutive assessments, at least 3 weeks apart). Participants with a baseline score of >= 27 were not evaluable, as it would not have been possible to show an improvement. Participants with no baseline data were also not evaluable.

  7. Median Number of Months Until Symptomatic Progression (Worsening of Symptoms)

    Time frame: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last symptom assessment (up to 33 weeks).

    Symptoms were assessed using the FACT-LCS questionnaire. This 7-item scale has scores ranging from 0 (severely symptomatic) to 28 (symptom-free). Symptomatic progression was defined as >= 2-point decrease from baseline in score (maintained for 2 consecutive assessments at least 3 weeks apart). Time to symptomatic progression was defined as the time from randomization to date of symptoms worsening. For participants with no symptom progression, the date of the last symptom assessment was used. See also Outcome Measure 15.

  8. Number of Participants Who Died, or Experienced Other Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). An SAE was defined as an AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization (or prolongation of existing hospitalization), or was an important medical event.

  9. Number of Participants Experiencing AEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

    Time frame: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). The results presented are stratified according to which drug was discontinued.

  10. Number of Participants Experiencing Other Significant AEs: Acneform Rash

    Time frame: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, it was decided that AEs that were categorized under the composite term "acneform rash" were of particular importance. These AEs were: rash, rash pustular, rash erythematous, dermatitis acneiform, dermatitis exfoliative, rash papular, rash pruritic, rash generalised, rash macular, rash maculo-papular, acne, acne pustular, skin desquamation and dry skin.

  11. Number of Participants Experiencing Other Significant AEs: Infusion Reaction

    Time frame: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, it was decided that AEs that were categorized under the composite term "infusion reaction" were of particular importance. These AEs were: infusion-related reaction, hypersensitivity, anaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic shock, and anaphylactoid reaction regardless of when they occurred. The terms dyspnea, pyrexia and chills were also grouped under infusion reaction, provided the onset date of these toxicities occurred on the first day of study treatment.

  12. Number of Participants Experiencing Other Significant AEs: Cardiac AEs

    Time frame: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, it was decided that AEs that were categorized under the composite term "cardiac AE" were of particular importance. These AEs, coded as preferred or other level Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terms were: coronary artery disorders, cardiac arrhythmias, heart failures not elsewhere classified, left ventricular failures, sudden cardiac death, cardiac death and sudden death.

  13. Number of Participants Who Exprienced the Most Frequent Grade 3-4 Hematology Abnormalities Occurring in >=5% Participants

    Time frame: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

    Abnormalities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0. The scale is graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening). Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: Neutropenia: Grade 3, neutrophils <1.0 - 0.5 x 10^9/L; Grade 4, <0.5 x 10^9/L. Leukopenia: Grade 3, leukocytes <2.0 - 1.0 x 10^9/L; Grade 4, <1.0 x 10^9/L. Thrombocytopenia: Grade 3, platelets <50.0 - 25.0 x 10^9/L; Grade 4, <25.0 x 10^9/L. Anemia: Grade 3, hemoglobin <4.9 - 4.0 millimoles (mmol)/L, Grade 4, <4.0 mmol/L.

  14. Number of Participants Who Experienced the Most Frequent Grade 3-4 Serum Chemistry Abnormalities Occurring in >=5% Participants

    Time frame: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

    Abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTC, version 3.0. The scale is graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening). Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: Hyperglycemia (non-fasting): Grade 3, serum glucose >13.9 - 27.8 mmol/L; Grade 4 >27.8 mmol/L or acidosis. Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3, serum magnesium >1.23 - 3.30 mmol/L; Grade 4 >3.30 mmol/L. Hyponatremia: Grade 3, serum sodium <130 - 120 mmol/L; Grade 4 <120 mmol/L. Low albumin: Grade 3, serum albumin <20 g/L; Grade 4 not applicable.

  15. Number of Participants Who Had Unscheduled Visits to Physicians, Clinics, Hospitals and Other Unscheduled Major Medicinal Procedures

    Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle of treatment, at the end of study therapy evaluation and at the first follow-up visit (6 weeks after the end of study therapy evaluation).

    Participants were to complete log to collect information on unscheduled visits to physicians,clinics,hospitals & other unscheduled major procedures.If asked, participants were to complete and return log to site upon routinely scheduled visits.The purpose of this exploratory analysis was to understand the economical implications as a secondary objective.This was not a pivotal study & therefore not needed to support any arguments with regulatory authorities concerning cost-benefit,hence,it was not necessary to conduct this analysis. There is no intent on conducting this analysis in the future.

Other outcomes

  1. Median Change From Baseline in Symptoms, by Time Point

    Time frame: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last symptom assessment (up to 33 weeks).

    Symptoms were assessed using the FACT-LCS questionnaire. This 7-item scale has scores ranging from 0 (severely symptomatic) to 28 (symptom-free). The median change from baseline score was calculated at 3-weekly intervals. See also Outcome Measure 8.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study of Taxane/Carboplatin/Cetuximab Versus Taxane/Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2008
First posted
Jun 2, 2005
Registry last updated
Dec 24, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.