Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT06475989
This phase III trial compares the effect of cabozantinib versus combination dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer that does not respond to treatment (refractory) and which expresses a BRAF V600E mutation. Cabozantinib is in a class of medications called receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It binds to and blocks the action of several enzymes which are often over-expressed in a variety of tumor cell types. This may help stop or slow the growth of tumor cells and blood vessels the tumor needs to survive. Dabrafenib is an enzyme inhibitor that binds to and inhibits the activity of a protein called B-raf, which may inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells which contain a mutated BRAF gene. Trametinib is also an enzyme inhibitor. It binds to and inhibits the activity of proteins called MEK 1 and 2, which play a key role in activating pathways that regulate cell growth. This may inhibit the growth of tumor cells mediated by these pathways. The usual approach for patients with thyroid cancer is targeted therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. This trial may help researchers decide which treatment option (cabozantinib alone or dabrafenib in combination with trametinib) is safer and/or more effective in treating patients with refractory BRAF V600E-mutated differentiated thyroid cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC, Anchorage, Alaska, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with BRAF V600Em differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed on frontline multikinase inhibitor treated with dabrafenib/trametinib or cabozantinib.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the objective response rate in patients with BRAF V600Em differentiated thyroid cancer that progressed on frontline multikinase inhibitor treated with dabrafenib/trametinib or cabozantinib.
II. To compare the duration of response in patients with BRAF V600Em differentiated thyroid cancer that progressed on frontline multikinase inhibitor treated with dabrafenib/trametinib or cabozantinib.
III. To compare the overall survival in patients with BRAF V600Em differentiated thyroid cancer that progressed on frontline multikinase inhibitor treated with dabrafenib/trametinib or cabozantinib.
IV. To compare the PFS2 in patients with BRAF V600Em differentiated thyroid cancer that progressed on frontline multikinase inhibitor treated with dabrafenib/trametinib or cabozantinib.
V. To compare the safety/tolerability in patients with BRAF V600Em differentiated thyroid cancer that progressed on frontline multikinase inhibitor treated with dabrafenib/trametinib or cabozantinib.
QUALITY OF LIFE OBJECTIVE:
I. To assess patient tolerability of treatment using the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy General (FACT G)P5 and general quality of life using the FACT-G7.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Patients may crossover to other treatment arm at the time of progression.
ARM A: Patients receive dabrafenib orally (PO) twice per day (BID) and trametinib PO once per day (QD) on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, blood sample collection and may undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study.
ARM B: Patients receive cabozantinib PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan, blood sample collection and may undergo MRI throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter up to 5 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
All patients of childbearing potential must have a blood test or urine study within 14 days prior to randomization to rule out pregnancy.
A patient of childbearing potential is defined as anyone, regardless of sexual orientation or whether they have undergone tubal ligation, who meets the following criteria: 1) has achieved menarche at some point, 2) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 3) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months).
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Given PO
Undergo CT scan
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, tomography
Given PO
Other names: BRAF Inhibitor GSK2118436, GSK-2118436, GSK-2118436A, GSK2118436
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Ancillary study
Given PO
Other names: GSK 1120212, GSK-1120212, GSK1120212, JTP-74057, MEK Inhibitor GSK1120212
Time frame: From randomization to radiographic progression of disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or death from any cause, up to 5 years
PFS will be compared between the two groups using a stratified log-rank test with one-sided type I error of 0.05. Median PFS and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each treatment arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The stratified hazard ratio and 95% CI will be estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model with treatment group as the independent variable.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be assessed based on international criteria proposed by the RECIST 1.1 guideline. Response (complete and partial responses) rate will be estimated. Will be compared using the Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause, up to 5 years
Median and 95% CI will be estimated in each arm using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From confirmed response (complete response or partial response) to progression among patients who achieve a response, up to 5 years
Median and 95% CI will be estimated in each arm using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization to progression on subsequent therapy or death from any cause, up to 5 years
Median and 95% CI will be estimated in each arm using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS2 will be measured for every patient. For patients who receive a next line of therapy, PFS2 will be measured from the time of randomization to radiographic progression on the next line of therapy after the protocol-assigned therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. If patients are alive and have not had progression on the next of line therapy, they will be censored at the last assessment on the next line of therapy, and PFS2 will be measured from the time of randomization to the last assessment. For patients who do not receive the next line of therapy, PFS2 will be measured from the time of randomization to last assessed on the protocol-assigned therapy and will be censored unless death occurs, in which case death will count as an event.
Time frame: at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and then every 12 weeks after the 16-week confirmatory scan
Using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Response rate and grade 3 or higher toxicity rates will be compared using the Fisher's exact test between the two arms.
Time frame: At baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 28 weeks
Will assess patients tolerability of treatment using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT G)7.
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Network
A Randomized Phase III Study of BRAF-Targeted Therapy vs Cabozantinib in RAI-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer With BRAF V600Em
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06959641
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Follicular
Torrance, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03914300
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Follicular
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04514484
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01208051
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Follicular
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details