AMG334
DrugSubcutaneous Injection
Other names: Erenumab
NCT Number: NCT03927144
The purpose of this study is to compare the sustained long-term benefit between two treatment paradigms of migraine prophylactic agents (erenumab versus a control arm of oral prophylactics) in episodic migraine patients who have previously failed 1 to 2 prophylactic migraine treatments.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
IDIM Instituto de Investigaciones Metabolicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subcutaneous Injection
Other names: Erenumab
SOC Oral Tablet/Capsule
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
A migraine day was defined as any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined as a migraine with or without aura, lasting for ≥ 30 minutes, and meeting at least one of the following criteria:
If the participant took a migraine-specific medication (ie, triptan or ergotamine) during aura, or to treat a headache on a calendar day, then it was counted as a migraine day regardless of the duration and pain features/associated symptoms.
In addition to achieving at least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days, participants must have also completed their initially assigned treatment through Month 12.
Time frame: Month 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 28, Week 32, Week 36, Week 40, Week 44, Week 48, and Week 52
A migraine day was defined as any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). The mean of monthly migraine days was obtained cumulatively every 4 weeks across 52 weeks (for example, at Week 8 the mean will be based on data from Week 1 to Week 8; and at Week 12 the mean will be based on data from Week 1 to Week 12). The cumulative mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days was derived using difference between cumulative average of each month and baseline monthly migraine days.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
The PGIC scale consists of one item which measures the participants' perception of change in their condition relative to the beginning of the study. Responses are rated on a 7-item response scale ranging from very much improved (7) to no change or worsened condition (1). A responder was defined as a participant with a PGIC score of at least 5 (5=moderately better, 6=better, 7=a great deal better), at Week 52 for participants who completed the treatment period at Week 52 on the initially assigned treatment.
Amgen
Industry
A 12-month Prospective, Randomized, Interventional, Global, Multi-center, Active-controlled Study Comparing Sustained Benefit of Two Treatment Paradigms (AMG334 qm vs. Oral Prophylactics) in Adult Episodic Migraine Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03096834
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Heidelberg, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05853900
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06004388
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03333109
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
View Trial Details