PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc
DeviceThe PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc was inserted into the intervertebral disc space of the cervical spine using the anterior surgical approach.
Other names: PRESTIGE® LP
NCT Number: NCT00667459
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc as a method of treating patients with symptoms of cervical degenerative disc disease at a single level from C3-C4 to C6-C7.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
This pivotal clinical trial was conducted to compare treatment data of the investigational implant device,the PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc, with a control patient group receiving a plate. The PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc devices were implanted using an anterior surgical approach. Data from control patients receiving anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with an ATLANTIS Anterior Cervical Plate from the initial Artificial Cervical Disc study (NCT00642876) were compared as both treatment groups receive single-level surgical treatment from C3-C4 to C6-C7 for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
If the level of Bone Mineral Density is a T score of -3.5 or lower or a T score of -2.5 or lower with the vertebral crush fracture, then the patient is excluded.
The PRESTIGE® LP Cervical Disc was inserted into the intervertebral disc space of the cervical spine using the anterior surgical approach.
Other names: PRESTIGE® LP
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ATLANTIS plate for control group
Other names: ATLANTIS plate
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of overall success is reported as the percentage of participants who met all of the following criteria:
Time frame: 24 months
Success rate of Neck Disability Index is reported as the percentage of participants whose neck disability index score met: Pre-treatment Score - Post-treatment Score ≥ 15.
Time frame: 24 months
Success rate of neurological status is reported as the percentage of participants who met neurological success defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections (motor, sensory, and reflexes) for the time period evaluated. In order for a section to be considered a success, each element in the section must remain the same or improve from the time of the preoperative evaluation to the time period evaluated.
Time frame: 24 months
Disc height was assessed by determining the Functional Spinal Unit (FSU) height. The rate of disc height success is reported as the percentage of participants whose disc height for each level based on either the anterior or posterior measurements met the following criterion: Postoperative Height - 6 Week Postoperative Height >= -2mm
Time frame: 24 months
Numerical rating scales were used to evaluate pain intensity and frequency. The pain score (0 min, 100 max) was derived by multiplying the numerical rating scores from the pain intensity (0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be.") and frequency scales (0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time"). Neck pain success rate is reported as the percentage of participants whose neck pain improvement met: Preoperative Score - Postoperative Score > 0.
Time frame: 24 months
Numerical rating scales were used to evaluate pain intensity and frequency. The pain score (0 min, 100 max) was derived by multiplying the numerical rating scores from the pain intensity (0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be.") and frequency scales (0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time"). Arm pain success rate is reported as the percentage of participants whose arm pain improvement met: Preoperative Score - Postoperative Score > 0.
Time frame: 24 months
Success rate of SF-36 Health Survey include two components: the success rate of a physical component summary (PCS) and the success rate of a mental component summary (MCS). The success of SF-36 PCS was defined as: Post Score - Pre Score >= 0. The Success rate of SF-36 PCS is reported as the percentage of the participants who were classified as a success for SF-36 PCS.
Time frame: 24 months
Success rate of SF-36 Health Survey include two components: the success rate of a physical component summary (PCS) and the success rate of a mental component summary (MCS). The success of SF-36 MCS were defined as: Post Score - Pre Score >= 0. The Success rate of SF-36 MCS is reported as the percentage of the participants who were classified as a success for SF-36 MCS.
Time frame: 24 months
Patient's gait was assessed by using Nurick's classification, and indicated either as normal or graded on a scale of 0 to 5. Success was defined as maintenance or improvement in the postoperative status as compared to the preoperative condition: Preoperative Score - Postoperative Score >= 0. The gait success rate is reported as the percentage of participants who had gait success.
Time frame: Time of operation, approximately 1.5 hrs.
Operative time was recorded from skin incision to wound closure.
Time frame: During the time of operation, approximately 1.5 hours.
Time frame: During the time of hospital stay, average of 1 day.
Time frame: 24 months post-operation
Secondary surgical procedures at the index level included revisions, removals, supplemental fixations and reoperations. Rate of secondary surgery at index level is reported as percentage of patients who had secondary surgeries at index level.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months post-operation
The self-administered Neck Disability Index (NDI) Questionnaire was used to assess patient neck pain and ability to function. The NDI scale ranges from 0-100. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 100 (maximum disability). Change of NDI was defined as NDI at 24 month minus NDI at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months post-operation
Numerical rating scales were used to evaluate neck pain intensity and frequency. Patients rated their neck pain intensity on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be." Similarly, patients recorded their neck pain frequency on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time." The total neck pain score (0 to100) was the product of pain intensity and frequency scores. Change of neck pain score was defined as neck pain score at 24 months minus neck pain score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months post-operation
Numerical rating scales were also used to evaluate arm pain intensity and frequency. Patients rated their arm pain intensity on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be." Similarly, patients recorded their arm pain frequency on a scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time." The total arm pain score (0 to 100) was the product of pain intensity and frequency scores. Change of arm pain score was defined as arm pain score at 24 months minus arm pain score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months post-operation
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). The score for PCS was between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life. Change of SF-36 PCS score was defined as PCS score at 24 months minus PCS score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months post-operation
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). The score for MCS was between 0 and 100, with higher scores denoting better quality of life. Change of SF-36 MCS score was defined as MCS score at 24 months minus MCS score at baseline.
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
Industry
A Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled Clinical Trial of an Artificial Cervical Disc LP at a Single Level for Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02667067
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02539394
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Disc Herniation
View Trial DetailsNCT02417272
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01106417
Bone Diseases, Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
View Trial Details