Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03386474

Study of Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab 6 mg Drug Product Intended for Commercialization in Patients With nAMD

The purpose of this extension study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg ophthalmic solution when given to the same patients who received brolucizumab in the core trial CRTH258A2301 (also known as CRTH258-C002). The medical condition treated in the core and extension trials was neo-vascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Arecibo, Puerto Rico

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Subjects in the United States who had completed the 96 week core trial, CRTH258A2301 (also referred as CRTH258-C002), were eligible to participate in the extension trial provided the core trial Visit 26 at week 96, was less than or equal to 12 weeks from the Baseline Visit in the extension trial, CRTH258A2301E1.

Subjects who were treated with aflibercept during the core trial and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial continued to receive aflibercept in this extension trial in order to maintain the masking during the extension trial. No hypothesis testing or descriptive analyses were planned.

Subjects who were treated in the core trial with brolucizumab 3mg or brolucizumab 6 mg, and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial, received the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg solution in the extension trial.

Enrolled subjects were to receive three intravitreal (IVT) ophthalmic injections. The study eye was the same eye that received the treatment in the core study. The extension trial consisted of 7 study visits at 4 week intervals over a period of 24 weeks.

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding core-study efficacy and safety data serving as the reference. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sign written informed consent
  • Completed the core study, CRTH258A2301, also known as CRTH258-C002 as defined by assessments at Visit 26/Week 96 within ≤12 weeks of the baseline.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient discontinued the treatment or the core study prematurely at any time
  • Patient received standard of care treatment for nAMD after completion of the core study
  • Pregnant or nursing women and women of child-bearing potential
  • Stroke or MI (myocardial infarction) within 3 months of the baseline extension visit

Treatment and study plan

Brolucizumab 6 mg

Drug

Administered as opthalmic solution for an intravitreal injection to the study eye

Other names: RTH258

Aflibercept 2 mg

Drug

Administered as an opthalmic solution for intravitreal injection to the study eye

Other names: EYELEA

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

    Number of participants with ocular and non-ocular treatment emergent events with the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg in this extension trial up to week 24 vs. the corresponding last 6 months of brolucizumab treatment in the Core trial >= 2%. Safety assessment of the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding Core safety data. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of Loss in BCVA of 15 Letters or More From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

    Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

  2. Change in BCVA From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Time frame: Extension baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

    Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

  3. Patients With Positive q12w Treatment Status at Week 20

    Time frame: Week 20

    The estimate for the proportion of patients with a positive q12w treatment status at Week 24 was derived from Kaplan Meier time-to-event analyses for the event 'first q8w-need'. The outcome of the Kaplan-Meier analysis was estimated probability for maintaining on q12w up to the Disease Activity Assessment (DAA) at exWeek 20. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

  4. Change in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

    Measurement of the central subfield thickness of the retina was assessed using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at each visit for the study eye. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

  5. Percentage of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status for Brolucuzumab 6 mg in Extension

    Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

    Positive integrated anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status is defined as induced ADA status with ADA negative at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value of greater than or equal to 30 at any time point or boosted ADA status with ADA positive at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value increase by more than 3-fold (1 dilution) at any time point. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A 24-week, Double-masked, Multicenter, Two-arm Extension Study to Collect Safety and Efficacy Data on Brolucizumab 6 mg Drug Product Intended for Commercialization in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Who Have Completed the CRTH258A2301 Study

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Dec 29, 2017
Registry last updated
Jan 5, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.