NCT Number: NCT02087150
Study of Safety and Efficacy for the Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter
The objective of this study is to determine whether Eustachian tube dilation in conjunction with medical management or medical management alone is effective for treating Eustachian tube dysfunction.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
22 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
California Ear Institute, East Palo Alto, California, United States
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Adult male or female aged 22 years and older
- Persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction
- Failure of medical management
- Positive diagnosis of ETD
- Absence of internal carotid artery (ICA) dehiscence
- Able to read and understand English
Exclusion criteria
- Females who are pregnant or lactating
- Anatomy that requires an adjunctive surgical procedure
- Concomitant nasal or sinus procedures planned on the same day as surgical procedure
- Concomitant ear procedures planned on the same day as surgical procedure
- History of major surgery of the head or neck within four (4) months prior to surgery
- History of patulous ET
- History of fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss
- Active acute otitis media
- Tympanic membrane perforation
- Tympanosclerosis
- Acute upper respiratory infection
- Temporomandibular joint disorder
- Cleft palate
- Craniofacial syndrome
- Cystic fibrosis
- Ciliary dysmotility syndrome
- Systemic mucosal or immunodeficiency disease
- Intolerance of medication for ETD
- Prior intervention of Eustachian tube
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Primary Efficacy Analysis: Number of Randomized Subjects With Tympanogram Normalization at 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 Week Follow-Up Visit
The primary efficacy analysis compares randomized subjects with tympanogram normalization (Types B or C normalized to Type A) in all indicated ears at 6 weeks in the investigational arm versus the control arm. Per protocol, tympanogram types are defined as follows: Type A: Peak compliance occurs between +50 and -100 daPa, with minimum peak height of 0.2ml. Indicates NORMAL middle ear function Type B: No sharp peak and a rounded line. Indicates ABNORMAL middle ear function Type C: Peak compliance occurs beyond -100 daPa. Indicates ABNORMAL middle ear function
Secondary outcomes
-
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Number of Randomized Subjects With MID Improvement From Baseline of 0.5 Points or More at 6 Weeks
Time frame: 6 Week Follow-Up Visit
The secondary efficacy endpoint will consist of comparison of subjects achieving at least a minimally important difference (MID) level improvement of 0.5 points on the ETDQ-7 at 6 weeks post-treatment in the investigational arm versus the proportion of subjects achieving at least an MID level improvement on the ETDQ-7 at 6 weeks post-randomization in the control arm The ETDQ-7 is a seven-item ETD specific validated quality of life survey. A mean item score of greater or equal to 2.1 indicates the presence of ETD.
Other outcomes
-
Exploratory Endpoint: Number of Randomized Subjects With Normalized Tympanometry at 12.24,52 Weeks
Time frame: 12, 24, 52 Week Follow-Up
Evaluation of subjects experiencing normalization of tympanometry at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-treatment in the investigational arm and evaluation of subjects experiencing normalization of tympanometry at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-randomization in the control arm. As MM subjects were allowed to receive a crossover procedure after their 6-week follow-up visit, there is a limited number of MM subjects who completed the 12/24/52 visits.
-
Exploratory Endpoint: Number of Randomized Subjects With ETDQ-7 Improvement at 12, 24, 52 Weeks
Time frame: 12,24,52 Week Follow-Up Visit
Evaluation of subjects achieving at least a MID level improvement of 0.5 points at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-treatment in the investigational arm and evaluation of subjects achieving at least a MID level improvement at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-randomization in the control arm. As MM subjects were allowed to receive a crossover procedure after their 6-week follow-up visit, there is a limited number of MM subjects who completed the 12/24/52 visits.
-
Exploratory Endpoint: WPAI at 6,12,24,52 Weeks
Time frame: 6,12,24,52 Week Follow-Up
Evaluation of subjects' work and activity impairment before and after treatment in both the investigational arm and the control arm. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire is a 6-question patient-reported general health assessment of productivity and activity impairment. WPAI results are expressed as the percentage of impairment from 0 to 100 where higher numbers indicate greater impairment or less productivity. Due to an error in the WPAI electronic data collection form, 2 questions were not visible to many subjects resulting in a significant amount of missing data for all scores except non-work activity impairment. Therefore, only the non-work activity impairment results are presented. As MM subjects were allowed to receive a crossover procedure after their 6-week follow-up visit, there is a limited number of MM subjects who completed the 12/24/52 visits.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Integra LifeSciences Corporation
Industry
Collaborators
- Acclarent
Registry information
Official study title
A Randomized Clinical Study of Safety and Efficacy for the Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter (ELLIOTT)
Acronym: ELLIOTT
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2016
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Mar 14, 2014
- Registry last updated
- Jul 12, 2024
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Effect of Rate (Slope) of Compression on the Incidence of Symptomatic ETD and MEB: a Phase III Prospective Study.
NCT04804098
Ear Barotrauma, Ear Diseases
Sleepy Hollow, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsSinuSonic for ETD and Facial Pain: Acoustic Vibration + Oscillating Expiratory Pressure
NCT04404036
Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, Facial Pain
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsHearing/ET/Vestibular in Balloon Pilots
NCT07200310
Ear Diseases, Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
Nevşehir, Göreme, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsAutoinflation as a Eustachian Tube Rehabilitation
NCT07122999
Disease Attributes, Ear Diseases
Busan, Seo-Gu, South Korea
View Trial Details