Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02087150

Study of Safety and Efficacy for the Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter

The objective of this study is to determine whether Eustachian tube dilation in conjunction with medical management or medical management alone is effective for treating Eustachian tube dysfunction.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

22 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

California Ear Institute, East Palo Alto, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult male or female aged 22 years and older
  • Persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction
  • Failure of medical management
  • Positive diagnosis of ETD
  • Absence of internal carotid artery (ICA) dehiscence
  • Able to read and understand English

Exclusion criteria

  • Females who are pregnant or lactating
  • Anatomy that requires an adjunctive surgical procedure
  • Concomitant nasal or sinus procedures planned on the same day as surgical procedure
  • Concomitant ear procedures planned on the same day as surgical procedure
  • History of major surgery of the head or neck within four (4) months prior to surgery
  • History of patulous ET
  • History of fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss
  • Active acute otitis media
  • Tympanic membrane perforation
  • Tympanosclerosis
  • Acute upper respiratory infection
  • Temporomandibular joint disorder
  • Cleft palate
  • Craniofacial syndrome
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Ciliary dysmotility syndrome
  • Systemic mucosal or immunodeficiency disease
  • Intolerance of medication for ETD
  • Prior intervention of Eustachian tube

Treatment and study plan

Acclarent Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter (ETBC)

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Efficacy Analysis: Number of Randomized Subjects With Tympanogram Normalization at 6 Weeks

    Time frame: 6 Week Follow-Up Visit

    The primary efficacy analysis compares randomized subjects with tympanogram normalization (Types B or C normalized to Type A) in all indicated ears at 6 weeks in the investigational arm versus the control arm. Per protocol, tympanogram types are defined as follows: Type A: Peak compliance occurs between +50 and -100 daPa, with minimum peak height of 0.2ml. Indicates NORMAL middle ear function Type B: No sharp peak and a rounded line. Indicates ABNORMAL middle ear function Type C: Peak compliance occurs beyond -100 daPa. Indicates ABNORMAL middle ear function

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Number of Randomized Subjects With MID Improvement From Baseline of 0.5 Points or More at 6 Weeks

    Time frame: 6 Week Follow-Up Visit

    The secondary efficacy endpoint will consist of comparison of subjects achieving at least a minimally important difference (MID) level improvement of 0.5 points on the ETDQ-7 at 6 weeks post-treatment in the investigational arm versus the proportion of subjects achieving at least an MID level improvement on the ETDQ-7 at 6 weeks post-randomization in the control arm The ETDQ-7 is a seven-item ETD specific validated quality of life survey. A mean item score of greater or equal to 2.1 indicates the presence of ETD.

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory Endpoint: Number of Randomized Subjects With Normalized Tympanometry at 12.24,52 Weeks

    Time frame: 12, 24, 52 Week Follow-Up

    Evaluation of subjects experiencing normalization of tympanometry at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-treatment in the investigational arm and evaluation of subjects experiencing normalization of tympanometry at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-randomization in the control arm. As MM subjects were allowed to receive a crossover procedure after their 6-week follow-up visit, there is a limited number of MM subjects who completed the 12/24/52 visits.

  2. Exploratory Endpoint: Number of Randomized Subjects With ETDQ-7 Improvement at 12, 24, 52 Weeks

    Time frame: 12,24,52 Week Follow-Up Visit

    Evaluation of subjects achieving at least a MID level improvement of 0.5 points at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-treatment in the investigational arm and evaluation of subjects achieving at least a MID level improvement at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-randomization in the control arm. As MM subjects were allowed to receive a crossover procedure after their 6-week follow-up visit, there is a limited number of MM subjects who completed the 12/24/52 visits.

  3. Exploratory Endpoint: WPAI at 6,12,24,52 Weeks

    Time frame: 6,12,24,52 Week Follow-Up

    Evaluation of subjects' work and activity impairment before and after treatment in both the investigational arm and the control arm. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire is a 6-question patient-reported general health assessment of productivity and activity impairment. WPAI results are expressed as the percentage of impairment from 0 to 100 where higher numbers indicate greater impairment or less productivity. Due to an error in the WPAI electronic data collection form, 2 questions were not visible to many subjects resulting in a significant amount of missing data for all scores except non-work activity impairment. Therefore, only the non-work activity impairment results are presented. As MM subjects were allowed to receive a crossover procedure after their 6-week follow-up visit, there is a limited number of MM subjects who completed the 12/24/52 visits.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Integra LifeSciences Corporation

Industry

Collaborators

  • Acclarent

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Clinical Study of Safety and Efficacy for the Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter (ELLIOTT)

Acronym: ELLIOTT

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Mar 14, 2014
Registry last updated
Jul 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.