Baloxavir Marboxil
DrugTablets taken orally
Other names: S-033188, Xofluza®
NCT Number: NCT02949011
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a single, oral dose of baloxavir marboxil compared with placebo by measuring the time to improvement of influenza symptoms in patients with influenza presenting within 48 hours of symptom onset.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
i. General symptoms (headache, feverishness or chills, muscle or joint pain, or fatigue) ii. Respiratory symptoms (cough, sore throat, or nasal congestion)
Exclusion criteria
Tablets taken orally
Other names: S-033188, Xofluza®
Matching tablets taken orally
Capsules taken orally
Other names: Tamiflu®
Matching placebo capsules taken orally
Time frame: From Day 1 pretreatment up to Day 14
Participants assessed the severity of 7 influenza-associated symptoms (cough, sore throat, headache, nasal congestion, feverishness/chills, muscle/joint pain, and fatigue) on a 4-point scale (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Time to improvement of symptoms was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the time when all influenza symptoms were alleviated, maintained, or improved, as defined below, for a duration of at least 21.5 hours:
Time to improvement of symptoms was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods; participants who did not experience improvement of symptom s were censored at the last observation.
Time frame: Days 2, 3, 4 (optional), 5, 6 (optional), and 9
Virus titer was quantified from nasopharyngeal swabs (or throat swabs if nasopharyngeal swabbing was not feasible) using tissue culture methods. Positive influenza virus titer was defined as virus titer not less than the lower limit of quantification (0.7 log₁₀ of the 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID₅₀/mL) among those assessed for virus titer on Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9.
Time frame: Days 2, 3, 4 (optional), 5, 6 (optional), and 9.
Influenza virus ribonucleic acid (RNA) was quantified from nasopharyngeal swabs (or throat swabs, if nasopharyngeal swabbing was not feasible). The percentage of participants with detectable virus RNA (2.05 for flu A and 2.83 for flu B log₁₀ virus particles/mL) measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) among those assessed on Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9.
Time frame: Day 1 pretreatment (Baseline) and Days 2, 3, 4 (optional), 5, 6 (optional), and 9
Virus titer was quantified from nasopharyngeal swabs (or throat swabs if nasopharyngeal swabbing was not feasible) by tissue culture methods.
If virus titer was less than the lower limit of quantification, the virus titer was imputed 0.7 (TCID₅₀/mL).
Time frame: Day 1 pretreatment (Baseline) and Days 2, 3, 4 (optional), 5, 6 (optional), and 9
Nasopharyngeal swabs (or throat swabs, if nasopharyngeal swabbing was not feasible) were obtained for viral quantitation. Virus RNA was measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 9
This endpoint was defined as AUC of change from Baseline in virus titer from Day 1 to Day 9. AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 9
This endpoint was defined as AUC of change from baseline in the amount of virus RNA (RT-PCR) from Day 1 to Day 9. The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 9
Time to cessation of viral shedding by virus titer was defined as the time between the initiation of the study treatment and first time when the virus titer was below the limit of detection (0.7 log₁₀[TCID₅₀/mL]). The median and 95% confidence interval (CI) for time to cessation of viral shedding determined by virus titer was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method; participants whose virus titer had not reached cessation by the last observation time point were treated as censored at that time point.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 9
Time to cessation of viral shedding by RT-PCR was defined as the time between the initiation of the study treatment and first time when the virus RNA was below the limit of detection measured by RT-PCR.
Time to cessation of viral shedding by RT-PCR was analyzed using the KM method; participants whose virus RNA had not reached cessation by the last observation time point were treated as censored at that time point.
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, and 216 hours after the initial dose of study treatment
Participants assessed the severity of 7 influenza-associated symptoms (cough, sore throat, headache, nasal congestion, feverishness or chills, muscle or joint pain, and fatigue) on a 4-point scale (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
Improvement of symptoms was defined as all influenza symptoms alleviated, maintained, or improved, as defined below, for a duration of at least 21.5 hours:
Time frame: Initiation of study treatment up to Day 14
Participants assessed the severity of seven influenza-associated symptoms (cough, sore throat, headache, nasal congestion, feverishness or chills, muscle or joint pain, and fatigue) on a 4-point scale (with 0 indicating no symptoms, 1 mild symptoms, 2 moderate symptoms, and 3 severe symptoms).
Time to alleviation of symptoms was defined as the time from the start of the study treatment to the time when all seven influenza-related symptoms were assessed by the participant as absent (0) or mild (1) for at least 21.5 hours.
Time to alleviation of symptoms was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods; participants who did not experience alleviation of symptoms were censored at the last observation time point.
Time frame: Initiation of study treatment up to Day 14
Participants assessed the severity of 7 influenza-associated symptoms on a 4-point scale (from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms). Time to improvement of the 4 systemic symptoms was defined as the time between the initiation of study treatment to the time when all 4 systemic symptoms (headache, feverishness or chills, muscle or joint pain, and fatigue) were alleviated, maintained, or improved, as defined below, for a duration of at least 21.5 hours:
Time to improvement of the 4 systemic symptoms was analyzed using KM methods; participants who did not experience improvement of symptoms were censored at the last observation.
Time frame: Initiation of study treatment up to Day 14
Participants assessed the severity of 7 influenza-associated symptoms on a 4-point scale (from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms). Time to improvement of the 3 respiratory symptoms was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to the time when all 3 respiratory symptoms (cough, sore throat, and nasal congestion) were alleviated, maintained, or improved, as defined below, for a duration of at least 21.5 hours:
Time to improvement of the 3 respiratory symptoms was analyzed using KM methods; participants who did not experience improvement of symptoms were censored at the last observation time point.
Time frame: Initiation of study treatment up to Day 14
Time to resolution of fever was defined as the time between the initiation of the study treatment and the resolution of fever. The resolution of fever was defined as the time when the participant's self-measured axillary temperature became less than 37ºC and was maintained at less than 37ºC for at least 12 hours. Time to resolution of fever was analyzed using KM methods; participants who did not experience resolution of fever by the last observation time point were censored at that time point.
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, and 216 hours after the initial dose of study treatment
Defined as the percentage of patrticipants whose axillary body temperature dropped to less than 37ºC after the initiation of the study treatment.
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours after the initial dose of study treatment
Participant's self-measured axillary temperature using an electronic thermometer.
Time frame: Initiation of study treatment up to Day 14
Participants assessed the severity of 7 influenza-associated symptoms on a 4-point scale (0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe). Time to improvement of cough, fatigue, and muscle/joint pain was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the time when each symptom was alleviated, maintained, or improved, as defined below, for at least 21.5 hours:
Time to improvement of symptoms was analyzed using KM methods; participants with no improvement of symptoms were censored at the last observation.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 14
Participants were asked to record their preinfluenza health status on a scale from 0 (worst possible health) to 10 (normal health [for someone your age and condition]), and their health status at baseline and every day after initiation of study treatment on the same scale. Return to preinfluenza health status was defined as time from the initiation of the study treatment to the first time when the health status score was equal to or higher than the preinfluenza health status score.
Time to return to preinfluenza health status was analyzed using KM methods; participants with a smaller number on the scale for health status by the last observation time point were censored at that time point.
Time frame: Day 2 to Day 22
The percentage of participants who received systemic antibiotics for any of the predefined complications (sinusitis, otitis media, bronchitis and pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 22
Defined as the percentage of patients who experience each influenza-related complication (hospitalization, death, sinusitis, otitis media, bronchitis, and radiologically-confirmed pneumonia) as an adverse event after the initiation of study treatment.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug to Day 22
Shionogi
Industry
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study of a Single Dose of S-033188 Compared With Placebo or Oseltamivir 75 mg Twice Daily for 5 Days in Patients With Influenza at High Risk of Influenza Complications
Acronym: CAPSTONE 2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04794829
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737106
Infections, Influenza
Bayan Nur, Inner Mongolia, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06518577
Infections, Influenza
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06560151
Infections, Influenza
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details