Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04368559

Study of Rezafungin Compared to Standard Antimicrobial Regimen for Prevention of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation

The purpose of this pivotal study is to determine if intravenous Rezafungin is efficacious and safe in the prevention of invasive fungal diseases when compared to the standard antimicrobial regimen.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

A Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, efficacy and safety study of Rezafungin for injection versus the standard antimicrobial regimen for the prevention of invasive fungal diseases in subjects undergoing allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Males or females ≥18 years of age.
  • Receiving a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched allogeneic peripheral BMT from a family or unrelated donor, HLA-mismatched related or unrelated donor, or haploidentical donor.
  • Diagnosed with 1 of the following underlying diseases:
  • Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with or without a history of myelodysplastic syndrome, in first or second complete remission.
  • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in first or second complete remission.
  • Acute undifferentiated leukemia in first or second remission.
  • Acute biphenotypic leukemia in first or second complete remission.
  • Chronic myelogenous leukemia in either chronic or accelerated phase.
  • One of the following myelodysplastic syndrome(s) defined by the following:

i. Refractory anemia.

ii. Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts.

iii. Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia.

iv. Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia and ringed sideroblasts.

v. Refractory anemia with excess blasts - 1 (5-10% blasts).

vi. Refractory anemia with excess blasts - 2 (10-20% blasts).

vii. Myelodysplastic syndrome, unclassified.

viii. Myelodysplastic syndrome associated with isolated del (5q).

g. Lymphoma (including Hodgkin's) with chemosensitive disease (i.e., response to chemotherapy) and receiving a related or unrelated donor transplant.

h. Aplastic anemia.

i. Primary or secondary myelofibrosis.

j. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

k. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

l. Drepanocytosis (sickle cell anemia).

m. Red blood cell aplasia.

n. Myeloproliferative disorder, unclassified.

o. Multiple myeloma (plasma cell myeloma).

  • Receiving myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.
  • Adequate renal and hepatic function prior to initiation of conditioning regimen, therefore between 40 days prior and 10 days prior to BMT, documented as follows:
  • Hepatic: alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to (≤) 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and total serum bilirubin ≤1.5 × ULN (excluding Gilbert's Syndrome).
  • Renal: serum creatinine ≤2 milligrams (mg)/deciliter (dL) and with creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than or equal to (≥) 30 milliliters (mL)/minute (min) without a history of renal transplant, or undergoing weekly dialysis within 4 weeks of the BMT.
  • Baseline blood samples drawn for Platelia galactomannan enzyme immunoassay (GM EIA) and β-D glucan levels within 15 days before randomization, with results available prior to randomization.
  • Baseline Toxoplasma serologies available within 6 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects with a positive toxoplasma IgG serology at any time prior to randomization do not need to repeat the toxoplasma serologies (IgG and IgM) and will be considered to have a prior history of toxoplasmosis.
  • Baseline glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency determination by the investigator prior to randomization with no known evidence of G6PD deficiency performed any time prior to randomization. If the Investigator assesses the subject as G6PD sufficient, the G6PD test result does not need to be entered into the EDC system.
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential <2 years post-menopausal (unless surgically sterile) must agree to and comply with using 1 barrier method (e.g., female condom with spermicide) plus one other highly effective method of birth control (e.g., oral contraceptive, implant, injectable, indwelling intrauterine device, vasectomized partner), or sexual abstinence (only possible if it corresponds to the subject's usual lifestyle) while participating in this study, and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Male subjects must be vasectomized, abstain from sexual intercourse, or agree to use barrier contraception (condom with spermicide), and agree not to donate sperm while participating in the study and for 120 days from the last IV dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of AML not in morphological remission.
  • Diagnosis of chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma: a first relapse can occur provided that a second complete remission has occurred.
  • Suspected or diagnosed invasive fungal disease (IFD) within 4 weeks of randomisation.
  • Diagnosed symptomatic heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest ≤50%, or shortening fraction ≤26%.
  • Personal or family history of Long QT interval on electrocardiogram (ECG) (QT) syndrome or a prolonged QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) (>470 milliseconds [msec] in males and >480 msec in females); or concurrent administration of terfenadine, cisapride, astemizole, erythromycin, pimozide, quinidine, or halofantrine.
  • Diagnosed reduced lung function with either diffusion capacity (corrected for hemoglobin) or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤65% of predicted value, or O2 saturation ≤82% on room air.
  • Suspected or documented PCP within 2 years of screening.
  • Positive baseline serum Platelia GM EIA (≥ 0.5) and/or β-D glucan assay (Fungitell ≥80 picograms [pg]/mL or Fujifilm Wako >11 pg/mL) within 15 days prior to the transplant.
  • Receipt of previous allogeneic BMT.
  • Planned receipt of cord blood for transplantation.
  • Planned peripheral blood or marrow autograft.
  • Not applicable to protocol Amendment 6.
  • Grade 2 or higher ataxia, tremor, motor neuropathy, or sensory neuropathy, per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
  • History of severe (Grade ≥3) ataxia, neuropathy or tremors; or a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis or a movement disorder (including Parkinson's disease or Huntington's disease).
  • . .
  • Planned or ongoing intake at screening of a known severe neurotoxic medication or with a known moderate neurotoxic medication in a patient with ataxia, tremor, motor neuropathy, or sensory neuropathy of CTCAE version 5.0 Grade 1 or higher.
  • Any contraindication or a medication or supplement known to severely interact with the standard antimicrobial regimen (SAR) as detailed in the US Prescribing Information (USPI) or Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of fluconazole, posaconazole, or TMP/SMX.
  • Known hypersensitivity to Rezafungin for Injection, any echinocandin, fluconazole, posaconazole, other azole antifungal, or to any of their excipients.
  • Known hypersensitivity or inability to receive TMP/SMX or any of its excipients, including but not limited to anaphylaxis, exfoliative skin disorders, or acute porphyria.
  • Recent use of an investigational medicinal product within 28 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational medicinal product, whichever is greater, to prevent overlapping toxicities when this study's investigational product is dosed, or presence of an investigational device at the time of screening. In some cases, use of investigational products may be acceptable in consultation with the Sponsor's Medical Monitor.
  • Known infection with HIV. Subjects with unknown HIV status should be tested for HIV antibodies per standard of care.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • The Principal Investigator (PI) determines that the subject should not participate in the study.
  • Considered unlikely to follow up for 90 days after receipt of the BMT due to logistic concerns (i.e., location relative to transplant center).
  • Known liver cirrhosis, diagnosed according to country or Medical Society specific guidelines and documented in the medical records prior to initiating conditioning regimen.

Treatment and study plan

Rezafungin for Injection

Drug

Intravenous antifungal therapy

Other names: Intravenous antifungal therapy

Posaconazole

Drug

Oral antifungal therapy

Other names: Noxafil

Fluconazole

Drug

Oral antifungal therapy

Other names: Generic Fluconazole

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX)

Drug

Oral antibacterial therapy

Other names: Bactrim, Septra

Intravenous placebo

Drug

Normal saline

Other names: Placebo Infusion

oral placebo

Drug

Microcrystalline cellulose

Other names: encapsulated cellulose

Primary outcomes

  1. Noninferior Fungal-Free Survival (US FDA)

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The number of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free and survive.

  2. Noninferior Fungal-Free Survival (US FDA)

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free and survive.

  3. Superior Fungal-Free Survival (EMA)

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The number of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free and survive.

  4. Superior Fungal-Free Survival (EMA)

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free and survive.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compare Discontinuation for Toxicity or Intolerance

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The number of subjects that discontinued Rezafungin for Injection compared to the standard antimicrobial regimen (SAR) secondary to toxicity or intolerance.

  2. Compare Discontinuation for Toxicity or Intolerance

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The percentage of subjects that discontinued Rezafungin for Injection compared to the standard antimicrobial regimen (SAR) secondary to toxicity or intolerance.

  3. Compare Proven and Probable IFD

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The number of subjects in each treatment group who have proven and probable IFD including the number of invasive infections from Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and Pneumocystis jirovecii.

  4. Compare Proven and Probable IFD

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have proven and probable IFD including the number of invasive infections from Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and Pneumocystis jirovecii.

  5. Compare Fungal-Free Survival with or without a Diagnosis of Clinically Significant GVHD

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The number of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free survival with or without a diagnosis of clinically significant GVHD.

  6. Compare Fungal-Free Survival with or without a Diagnosis of Clinically Significant GVHD

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free survival with or without a diagnosis of clinically significant GVHD.

  7. Compare Time to IFD, or Death

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    Evaluate time to IFD (proven or probable IFD) or death in subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the standard antimicrobial regimen (SAR).

  8. Compare Mortality

    Time frame: Day 1 through follow-up visit (Day 120)

    Evaluate overall mortality and attributable mortality, with and without adjustment for patient comorbidity indices, in subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  9. Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]

    Time frame: Day 1 through follow-up visit (Day 120)

    The number of subjects with incidence of treatment emergent adverse events based on clinical chemistry, hematology and urine analysis laboratory test, vital sign, physical exams and ECG abnormalities.

Other outcomes

  1. Comparison of Fungal-Free

    Time frame: Day 14 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), Day 60 (±5 days), and Day 120 (±7 days)

    The number of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free.

  2. Comparison of Fungal-Free

    Time frame: Day 14 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), Day 60 (±5 days), and Day 120 (±7 days)

    The percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free.

  3. Comparison of Presence and Severity of GHVD

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    Evaluate the presence and severity of GVHD in subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  4. Comparison of Fungal-Free with AML

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The number of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free with an underlying diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

  5. Comparison of Fungal-Free with AML

    Time frame: Day 90 (±7 days)

    The percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are fungal-free with an underlying diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

  6. Compare Incidence of IFD

    Time frame: Day 14 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), Day 60 (±5 days), Day 90 (±7 days), and Day 120 (±7 days)

    Evaluate the incidence of proven, probable, possible, and presumptive IFD in subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  7. Compare Relapse-Free Survival

    Time frame: Day 1 through follow-up visit (Day 120)

    Evaluate relapse-free survival, with and without adjustment for patient comorbidity indices, in subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  8. Evaluate PK (Cmax)

    Time frame: Day 0 (±2 days) within 10 minutes before end of infusion, and one sample between end of infusion and 12 hours after end of infusion; Days 1-4, one sample at any time; Day 7 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), and Day 63 (±1 day) prior to dosing; and EOT visit

    Evaluate maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

  9. Evaluate PK (Tmax)

    Time frame: Day 0 (±2 days) within 10 minutes before end of infusion, and one sample between end of infusion and 12 hours after end of infusion; Days 1-4, one sample at any time; Day 7 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), and Day 63 (±1 day) prior to dosing; and EOT visit

    Evaluate time to Cmax.

  10. Evaluate PK (AUC)

    Time frame: Day 0 (±2 days) within 10 minutes before end of infusion, and one sample between end of infusion and 12 hours after end of infusion; Days 1-4, one sample at any time; Day 7 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), and Day 63 (±1 day) prior to dosing; and EOT visit

    Evaluate area under the curve (AUC).

  11. Compare Post-Engraftment Cytopenias and Transfusion Requirements

    Time frame: Day 1 through follow-up visit (Day 120)

    Evaluate post-engraftment cytopenias and transfusion requirements of Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  12. Compare Infections Caused by TMP/SMX-Sensitive Organisms

    Time frame: Day 14 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), Day 60 (±5 days), Day 90 (±7 days), and Day 120 (±7 days)

    Evaluate infections caused by TMP/SMX-sensitive organisms (Toxoplasma gondii [T. gondii], Nocardia spp.) in Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  13. Compare Antifungal Prophylaxis

    Time frame: Day 14 (±1 day), Day 28 (±1 day), Day 60 (±5 days), Day 90 (±7 days), and Day 120 (±7 days)

    Evaluate interruption and discontinuation of antifungal prophylaxis due to suspected IFDs of Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  14. Compare the health economics outcome research (HEOR) variable of "Days in Hospital"

    Time frame: Once weekly for outpatient, or twice weekly for inpatient, at completion of study drug therapy [Day 90 (±7 days)] and for 30 days [Day 120 (±7 days)]

    Evaluate the number of hospital days for subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  15. Compare the health economics outcome research (HEOR) variable of "Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)"

    Time frame: Once weekly for outpatient, or twice weekly for inpatient, at completion of study drug therapy [Day 90 (±7 days)] and for 30 days [Day 120 (±7 days)]

    Evaluate the number of days in ICU for subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  16. Compare the health economics outcome research (HEOR) variable of "Readmission due to Infectious Disease Diagnosis"

    Time frame: Once weekly for outpatient, or twice weekly for inpatient, at completion of study drug therapy [Day 90 (±7 days)] and for 30 days [Day 120 (±7 days)]

    Evaluate readmission(s) due to infectious disease diagnosis for subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  17. Compare the health economics outcome research (HEOR) variable of "Readmission due to Invasive Fungal Disease Diagnosis"

    Time frame: Once weekly for outpatient, or twice weekly for inpatient, at completion of study drug therapy [Day 90 (±7 days)] and for 30 days [Day 120 (±7 days)]

    Evaluate readmission(s) due to invasive fungal disease diagnosis for subjects randomized to Rezafungin for Injection compared to the SAR.

  18. Compare the health economics outcome research (HEOR) variable of "Alternative Antifungal Therapy"

    Time frame: Once weekly for outpatient, or twice weekly for inpatient, at completion of study drug therapy [Day 90 (±7 days)] and for 30 days [Day 120 (±7 days)]

    Evaluate the incidence of alternative antifungal therapy compared to Rezafungin for Injection and the SAR.

  19. Compare the health economics outcome research (HEOR) variable of "Antibiotic Therapy"

    Time frame: Once weekly for outpatient, or twice weekly for inpatient, at completion of study drug therapy [Day 90 (±7 days)] and for 30 days [Day 120 (±7 days)]

    Evaluate the incidence of antibiotic therapy compared to Rezafungin for Injection and the SAR.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mundipharma Research Limited

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Rezafungin for Injection Versus the Standard Antimicrobial Regimen to Prevent Invasive Fungal Diseases in Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation (The ReSPECT Study)

Acronym: ReSPECT

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 30, 2020
Registry last updated
Apr 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.