Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03993899

Study of Quality Perception on Music in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects Using or Not a Fine Structure Strategy

Main objective:

Show the superiority of Fine Structure (FS4) strategy compared to Continuous Interleaved Sampling (HDCIS) strategy on the qualitative preference for the listening of musical pieces.

Secondary objectives

* Show the superiority of FS4 strategy compared to the HDCIS strategy on the perception of musical elements (contour test). * Analyze the link between the results of musical perception tests and the subjective preference of musical listening. * Show the non inferiority of FS4 strategy compared to the HDCIS strategy on the perception of speech elements. * Analyze the link between the results of musical perception tests and the results of the perception of speech elements. * Analyze the qualitative multidimensional perception with HDCIS and FS4

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Introduction:

At present, most people with modern cochlear implant systems can understand speech using the device alone, at least under favorable listening conditions.

In recent years, research has increasing focussed on how implant users perceive sounds other than speech. In particular, music perception is of interest.

A review of the literature on musical perception with traditional implants, coding only the temporal envelope [McDermott 2004], revealed the following elements:

  • On average, implant users perceive the rhythm approximately as well as listeners with normal hearing
  • With technically sophisticated multi-channel sound processors, melody recognition, especially without rhythmic or verbal cues, is poor.
  • The perception of timbre, especially the sounds of musical instruments, is generally unsatisfactory.
  • Implant users tend to rate the quality of musical sounds as less enjoyable than listeners with normal hearing And studies show that the fine structure of sound is the main vector of information for music and the location of sounds. [Smith et al. 2002] It therefore seems necessary to focus on the contribution of the coding of the fine temporal structure of sound to the cochlear implant.

Main objective:

Show the superiority of FS4 strategy compared to HDCIS strategy on the qualitative preference for the listening of musical pieces.

Secondary objectives:

  • Show the superiority of FS4 strategy compared to the HDCIS strategy on the perception of musical elements (contour test).
  • Analyze the link between the results of musical perception tests and the subjective preference of musical listening.
  • Show the non inferiority of FS4 strategy compared to the HDCIS strategy on the perception of speech elements.
  • Analyze the link between the results of musical perception tests and the results of the perception of speech elements.
  • Analyze the qualitative multidimensional perception with HDCIS and FS4

Plan of the study:

It is a prospective open monocentric randomized crossover study: measures will be done on the patient at 15 days and 30 days post-activation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient (≥ 18 years old) speaking French
  • Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation

Exclusion criteria

  • Retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma

Treatment and study plan

FineHearing strategy or HDCIS strategy

Device

Cochlear implant with FineHearing strategy or HDCIS strategy

Primary outcomes

  1. Qualitative measure of music

    Time frame: at 15 days post-activation

    The Gabrielsson scale (1988) is used to evaluate perceived sound quality as a multidimensional phenomenon, that is composed of a number of separate perceptual dimensions. Eight perceptual dimensions are evaluated: clarity, fullness, brightness vs dullness, hardness/sharpness vs softness, spaciousness, nearness, extraneous sounds, loudness. Visual analog scales (VAS) are used for each dimension and the patient has to score the dimension on a 10 cm VAS (between 0 to 10).

  2. Qualitative measure of music

    Time frame: at 30 days post-activation

    The Gabrielsson scale (1988) is used to evaluate perceived sound quality as a multidimensional phenomenon, that is composed of a number of separate perceptual dimensions. Eight perceptual dimensions are evaluated: clarity, fullness, brightness vs dullness, hardness/sharpness vs softness, spaciousness, nearness, extraneous sounds, loudness. Visual analog scales are used for each dimension and the patient has to score the dimension on a 10 cm VAS (between 0 to 10).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Speech recognition in quiet

    Time frame: at 15 days post-activation

    The speech recognition in quiet is evaluated with syllabic list of 40 phonemes. The patient has to recognize 21 syllables. The phonemes are scored: each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%).

  2. Speech recognition in quiet

    Time frame: at 30 days post-activation

    The speech recognition in quiet is evaluated with syllabic list of 40 phonemes. The patient has to recognize 21 syllables. The phonemes are scored: each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%).

  3. Differential frequency threshold

    Time frame: at 15 days post-activation

    This test aimed to determine the smallest perceptible difference in F0 between two stimuli for various baseline values of F0. An adaptive procedure is used.

  4. Differential frequency threshold

    Time frame: at 30 days post-activation

    This test aimed to determine the smallest perceptible difference in F0 between two stimuli for various baseline values of F0. An adaptive procedure is used.

  5. Melodic contour test

    Time frame: at 15 days post-activation

    The test stimuli of the melodic contour test (Galvin et al. 2007) are melodic contours composed of 5 notes of equal duration whose frequencies corresponded to musical intervals. Nine distinct musical patterns have to be identified by the patient. Each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%).

  6. Melodic contour test

    Time frame: at 30 days post-activation

    The test stimuli of the melodic contour test (Galvin et al. 2007) are melodic contours composed of 5 notes of equal duration whose frequencies corresponded to musical intervals. Nine distinct musical patterns have to be identified by the patient. Each good answer is scored 1 yielding a total between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Impact of Coding the Fine Structure of the Sound on the Musical Perception in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects. Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 21, 2019
Registry last updated
Jan 9, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.