Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04321343

Study of PXL065 in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Study site 11, Chandler, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study will be performed in patients with NASH. The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the change in the percentage of liver fat content (assessed by MRI-PDFF).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients have given written informed consent
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m²
  • For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: either naive of glucose lowering drug or under stable oral glucose lowering drug
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m²
  • Liver fat content ≥ 8% on MRI-PDFF
  • Qualifying liver biopsy (NAS) ≥ 4 and fibrosis score F1, F2 or F3
  • Effective contraception for women of child bearing potential

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence of another form of liver disease
  • Evidence of liver cirrhosis
  • Evidence of hepatic impairment
  • Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease
  • History of excessive alcohol intake
  • Acute cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to Randomization
  • Any disease which in the Investigator's opinion which in the Investigator's opinion would exclude the patient from the study
  • Use of non-permitted concomitant medication
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Treatment and study plan

PXL065

Drug

PXL065 oral tablet

Placebo oral tablet

Drug

Placebo oral tablet

Primary outcomes

  1. Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual.

    Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100.

    The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

  2. Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual.

    Absolute change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline.

    The analysis of the absolute change in LFC was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an ANCOVA model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

  2. Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    Responders were defined as patients who achieved a clinically meaningful relative reduction of at least 30% in LFC from baseline to Week 36 as assessed by MRI-PDFF

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  4. Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Normalization of ALT was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if ALT normalized, i.e. decreased to < upper reference range at a post baseline visit.

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  6. Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Normalization of AST was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if AST normalized, i.e. decreased to < upper reference range at a post baseline visit.

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    Pro-C3 is the released N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen. It is a fibrosis marker.

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    ELF score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) showing good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease.The set cutoffs for this scoring are: ELF < 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ELF between 7.7 - 9.8: moderate fibrosis; ELF between 9.8 - 11.3: severe fibrosis; and ELF > or = 11.3: cirrhosis.

    Blood samples used for TIMP-1, PIIINP and HA were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    Fib-4 score is a non invasive method based on clinical determinations that indicates the level of fibrosis/ scarring of the liver. The set cutoffs for this scoring are: Fib-4 < 1.45: absence of cirrhosis; Fib-4 between 1.45 - 3.25: inconclusive and Fib-4 > 3.25: cirrhosis.

    Fib-4 score was calculated as (Age [years] × AST [U/L]) / (platelet [10^9/L] × √[ALT [U/L]]). Blood samples used for AST, ALT and platelet counts were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    The NFS is based on a combination of clinical and laboratory measurements (i.e. age, glycemia, BMI, platelet, albumin and AST/ALT ratio). The set cutoffs for this scoring are: < -1.455 for exclusion of advance fibrosis, > -1.455 to < or = 0.675 for indetermined, and > 0.675 for presence of advance fibrosis.

    NFS was calculated as: 1.675 + 0.037 x age (years) + 0.094 x BMI (kg/m²) + 1.13 x Impaired Fasting Glucose or Diabetes (yes =1; no=0) + 0.99 x AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 x platelet (10^9/L) - 0.66 x albumin (g/dL)

  13. Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.

  14. Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.

  15. NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.

  16. NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

    NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  18. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  19. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  20. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  21. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    HOMA-IR was calculated as: Serum C-peptide (ng/mL) × FPG (mg/dL) / 405 Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    HOMA-IR is an indicator of insulin resistance. The higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

  22. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    The QUICKI was calculated as: 1 / (log (FPG [mg/dL]) + log (C-peptide [ng/mL])).

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    QUICKI is an indicator of insulin resistance. Lower numbers reflect greater insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

  23. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    The Adipo-IR was calculated as: Fasting serum Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) x Fasting serum insulin (μIU/mL) Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

    The Adipo-IR is a marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance. Higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

  24. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

  25. Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

    Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Poxel SA

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A 36-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PXL065 Versus Placebo in Noncirrhotic Biopsy-proven NonAlcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH) Patients

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 25, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.