Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07218042

Study of Procedural Efficiency in EBUS With Dual Versus Single NEEDLEs: Evaluating the Value of a Second Needle in EBUS as it Pertains to Economic and Environmental Impact

Currently, the EBUS bronchoscopy procedure uses either one or two needles to perform the biopsy of the lymph node based on physician preference. We want to determine the optimal number of needles to use for future EBUS bronchoscopy procedures like the one you are scheduled to have for your care and investigate the economic and environmental impact and time involved in using one versus two needles.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) is a mainstay of diagnostic bronchoscopy, as it is performed for mediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling for cancer staging, diagnosis of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, infection, and other disease processes. It is a procedure that is commonplace in all bronchoscopy suites across the world.

In our bronchoscopy suite, our current practice varies based on the bronchoscopist and number of lymph nodes requiring sampling in a procedure (can range from 1-5) as to whether one or two needles are utilized. The bronchoscopist may use two needles to save time when multiple lymph nodes must be biopsied or if an individual node needs to be biopsied several times to obtain more tissue for pathologic study.

EBUS needles are single use and there is one randomized trial (n=20 patients) that showed a decreased time of procedure in patients where two needles were used versus one (Khan et al., 2013). However, no data exist evaluating the economic impact (cost of needle versus endoscopy dollars saved) or environmental impact of using one versus two needles. This study will examine these factors to determine the optimal way to perform this procedure in the future, considering the procedure and anesthesia time, economic costs, and environmental costs.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergoing a bronchoscopy with lymph node sampling

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to get a bronchoscopy procedure for various reasons
  • Other criteria per protocol uploaded

Treatment and study plan

We randomized patients to the two arms above; there was no specific intervention performed other than randomizing patients to one or two needles.

Diagnostic Test

We randomized patients to the two arms above; there was no specific intervention performed other than randomizing patients to one or two needles.

Primary outcomes

  1. Time Under Anesthesia

    Time frame: During bronchoscopy procedure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Christopher Kapp

Other

Collaborators

  • Duke University
  • University of California, Davis

Registry information

Official study title

Are Two Needles Really Better Than One? A Time, Economic, and Environmental Evaluation of EBUS-TBNA

Acronym: SPEED NEEDLE

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Oct 20, 2025
Registry last updated
Oct 20, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.