Pembrolizumab
BiologicalIV infusion
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
NCT Number: NCT02702401
This is a study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants with previously systemically treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
The primary objectives of this study are to determine 1) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and 2) Overall Survival (OS) of pembrolizumab plus best supportive care (BSC) compared with placebo plus BSC. The primary hypotheses of this study are: 1) pembrolizumab plus BSC prolongs PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review compared to placebo plus BSC, and 2) pembrolizumab plus BSC improves OS compared with placebo plus BSC.
Effective with Amendment 4: Upon study completion, participants are discontinued and may be enrolled in a pembrolizumab extension study, if available.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
IV infusion
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
0.90% w/v sodium chloride IV infusion
Best supportive care will include pain management and management of other potential complications including ascites per local standards of care.
Time frame: Through database cutoff date of 26-Mar-2018 (Up to approximately 21 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesion was also considered PD. If there was no disease progression or death, participants were censored at the date of their last disease assessment. The PFS was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Final analyses for PFS was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 26-Mar-2018.
Time frame: Through database cutoff date of 02-Jan-2019 (Up to approximately 30 months)
OS was determined for all participants and was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants were censored at the date of their last follow-up. The OS was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Final analyses for OS was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 02-Jan-2019.
Time frame: Through database cutoff date of 02-Jan-2019 (Up to approximately 30 months)
ORR was determined in all participants and was defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Participants with missing data were considered non-responders. The ORR was analyzed using the Miettinen & Nurminen method. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 is presented. Final analyses for ORR was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 02-Jan-2019.
Time frame: Through database cutoff date of 02-Jan-2019 (Up to approximately 30 months)
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions), Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), or Stable Disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1 after ≥6 weeks as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). The DCR was analyzed using the Miettinen & Nurminen method. The percentage of participants who experienced a CR, PR, or SD is presented. Final analyses for DCR was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 02-Jan-2019.
Time frame: Through database cutoff date of 02-Jan-2019 (Up to approximately 30 months)
TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesion was also considered PD. If there was no documented disease progression, TTP was censored at last tumor assessment date. The TTP was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. TTP per RECIST 1.1 is presented for all participants. Final analyses for TTP was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 02-Jan-2019.
Time frame: From time of first documented evidence of CR or PR through database cutoff date of 02-Jan-2019 (Up to approximately 30 months)
DOR was determined in participants who demonstrated a Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). DOR was defined as time from first documented evidence of a CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) or death. Participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesion was also considered PD. The DOR was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Final analyses for DOR was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 02-Jan-2019.
Time frame: Through database cutoff date of 02-Jan-2019 (Up to approximately 30 months)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented. Final analyses for AE was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 02-Jan-2019.
Time frame: From Day 1 through end of treatment (Up to approximately 24 months)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented. Final analyses for AE was performed for the first pembrolizumab course at protocol specified cut off of 02-Jan-2019.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) vs. Best Supportive Care as Second-Line Therapy in Subjects With Previously Systemically Treated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (KEYNOTE-240)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03867084
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05007106
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02702414
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
View Trial DetailsNCT04892810
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Grenoble, France
View Trial Details