Pembrolizumab
BiologicalIV infusion
Other names: KEYTRUDA®, MK-3475
NCT Number: NCT03834493
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and enzalutamide in the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have not received chemotherapy for mCRPC, are abiraterone-naïve, or are intolerant to or progressed on abiraterone acetate. There are two primary study hypotheses.
Hypothesis 1: The combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide with respect to Overall Survival (OS).
Hypothesis 2: The combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide with respect to Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 3
Centro de Oncologia e Investigacion Buenos Aires COIBA ( Site 1013), Berazategui, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
The main inclusion and exclusion criteria include but are not limited to the following:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
IV infusion
Other names: KEYTRUDA®, MK-3475
Capsules/Tablets
Other names: XTANDI®
IV infusion
Other names: Normal saline or dextrose infusion
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The OS for all participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The rPFS per PCWG-modified RECIST for all participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
TFST was defined as time from randomization to initiation of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death, whichever occurs first. The TFST for all participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
PSA response rate was defined as percentage of participants in the analysis population who have a negative change (decrease) in PSA level of ≥50% measured twice ≥3 weeks apart. The analysis was performed on participants who had baseline PSA measurements.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
PSA undetectable rate was defined as percentage of participants in the analysis population with PSA <0.2 ng/mL during study treatment. The analysis was performed on participants who had baseline PSA measurements.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions per RECIST 1.1; and no evidence of disease (NED) on bone scan per PCWG) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions per RECIST 1.1; and non-progressive disease, non-evaluable [NE], or NED on bone scan or CR with non-progressive disease or NE bone scan per PCWG).
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per PCWG and RECIST 1.1 criteria until progressive disease (PD) or death. PD per RECIST 1.1 was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD per PCWG was the appearance of ≥2 new bone lesions on bone scan, that have been confirmed to not represent tumor flare, and were persistent for ≥6 weeks. The DOR was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. If a participant had not progressed, the participant was censored at the date of last disease assessment.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
Time from randomization to PSA progression. PSA progression date is defined as the date of 1) ≥25% increase and ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir, confirmed by a second value ≥3 weeks later if there is PSA decline from baseline, or 2) ≥25% increase and ≥2 ng/mL increase from baseline beyond 12 weeks if there is no PSA decline from baseline.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
Time from randomization to radiographic soft tissue progression per PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
Time from randomization to pain progression. In this study, pain progression was assessed by participant responses to Item 3 of the BPI-SF and participant AQA Scores which are both assessed by participants daily for 7 consecutive days.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
Time from randomization to the first SSRE. SSRE is defined as radiation to prevent or relieve skeletal symptoms, occurrence of new symptomatic pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, or surgery to bone.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in a participant, whether or not considered drug related. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product and does not imply any judgment about causality. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to 40 months (through database cut-off date of 12-Dec-2022)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in a participant, whether or not considered drug related. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product and does not imply any judgment about causality. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) (KEYNOTE-641)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03834506
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03834519
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Fullerton, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04108208
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02854982
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Nîmes, Gard, France
View Trial Details