Pembrolizumab
BiologicalIntravenous infusion
Other names: MK-3475
NCT Number: NCT02007070
This study is being done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors that are positive for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1): the hypothesis is that treatment with pembrolizumab will result in a clinically meaningful Overall Response Rate (ORR).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intravenous infusion
Other names: MK-3475
Time frame: Up to 2 years
On-study imaging was to be performed every 9 weeks after the first dose of study drug, or more frequently if clinically indicated. ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR; disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR; at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters). The percentage of strongly PD-L1 positive participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
Time frame: Up to 27 months (Up to 90 days after last dose of study drug)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the study drug, was also an AE. After discontinuation of study drug, each participant was monitored for a minimum of 30 days for AE monitoring (serious AEs were monitored for up to 90 days after last dose of study drug). The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the study drug, was also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued study drug due to an AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central radiologists' review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as either a 20% relative increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study OR an absolute increase of >5 mm in the sum of lesions, OR the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. The median PFS for all strongly PD-L1 positive participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
DOR was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease was objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded on study). DOR was censored at the last tumor assessment date if a responder did not have PD or death. Non-responders were not included in the analysis. The lower and upper limits were estimated at the time of data cutoff. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in days. The median DOR for all strongly PD-L1 positive participants with a confirmed response is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
OS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS is reported for all strongly PD-L1 positive participants in months
Time frame: Up to 2 years
ORR per irRC was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions [whether measureable or not, and no new lesions; irCR must be confirmed by repeated, consecutive assessments made no less than 4 weeks from the date first documented]) or Partial Response (irPR: Decrease in sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters [SPD] of 50% or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation). The percentage of strongly PD-L1 positive participants who experienced an irCR or irPR is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per irRC or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using irRC, progressive disease was defined as at least a 25% increase in SPD relative to minimum recorded tumor burden. Confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the data first documented was required. Median PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is presented in months for all strongly PD-L1 positive participants.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
DOR was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for irCR/irPR (whichever was first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease (PD) was objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded on study). PD was defined as at least a 25% increase in SPD relative to minimum recorded tumor burden. Confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the data first documented was required. DOR was censored at the last tumor assessment date if a responder did not have PD or death. Non-responders were not included in the analysis. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, is reported in days and is presented for all strongly PD-L1 positive participants who experienced an irCR or irPR.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
On-study imaging was to be performed every 9 weeks after the first dose of study drug, or more frequently if clinically indicated. ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters). The percentage of PD-L1 positive participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central radiologists' review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as either a 20% relative increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study OR an absolute increase of >5 mm in the sum of lesions, OR the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. The median PFS for all PD-L1 positive participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
DOR was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease was objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded on study). DOR was censored at the last tumor assessment date if a responder did not have PD or death. Non-responders were not included in the analysis. The lower and upper limits were estimated at the time of data cutoff. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in days. The median DOR for all PD-L1 positive participants with a confirmed response is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
OS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS is reported for all PD-L1 positive participants in months.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
ORR per irRC was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a irCR (Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions [whether measureable or not, and no new lesions; irCR must be confirmed by repeated, consecutive assessments made no less than 4 weeks from the date first documented]) or irPR (Decrease in sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters [SPD] of 50% or greater by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation). The percentage of PD-L1 positive participants who experienced an irCR or irPR is presented.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per irRC or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using irRC, progressive disease was defined as at least a 25% increase in SPD relative to minimum recorded tumor burden. Confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the data first documented was required. Median PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is presented in months for all PD-L1 positive participants.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
DOR was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for irCR/irPR (whichever was first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease (PD) was objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded on study). PD was defined as at least a 25% increase in SPD relative to minimum recorded tumor burden. Confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the data first documented was required. DOR was censored at the last tumor assessment date if a responder did not have PD or death. Non-responders were not included in the analysis. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, is reported in days and is presented for all PD-L1 positive participants who experienced an irCR or irPR.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
An Open-label, Non-randomized, Multi-center Phase Ib Study of MK-3475 in Subjects With PD-L1 Positive Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02718066
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05348668
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04702009
Advanced Lung Carcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06477055
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial Details