Pembrolizumab
BiologicalAdministered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (Q3W)
Other names: KEYTRUDA®, MK-3475
NCT Number: NCT03302234
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of pembrolizumab given in combination with either ipilimumab or placebo as first-line treatment in participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary hypothesis of this study is that overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) is prolonged in participants who receive pembrolizumab and ipilimumab compared to those who receive pembrolizumab and placebo.
With Amendment 6 (effective date: 11-Dec-2020), active participants, investigator, and sponsor personnel or delegate(s) involved in the treatment administration or clinical evaluation of the participants will be unblinded. Participants will discontinue ipilimumab and placebo and participants who remain on treatment will receive open-label pembrolizumab only.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas - Clinica Viedma ( Site 0202), Viedma, Río Negro Province, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (Q3W)
Other names: KEYTRUDA®, MK-3475
Administered as an IV infusion every 6 weeks (Q6W)
Other names: YERVOY®
Normal saline solution administered as an IV infusion Q6W
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months (through data cut-off date: 01 Sep 2020)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last known contact. The median survival (in months) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported using Kaplan-Meier method was used. Cox regression model with Efron's method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate stratified by ECOG performance status (0 versus 1), geographic region of the enrolling site (East Asia versus non-East Asia), and predominant tumor history (squamous versus non-squamous) was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs for first course study treatment per protocol.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months (through data cut-off date 01 Sep 2020)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD is defined as ≥20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. RECIST 1.1 has been modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. The median survival (in months) and associated 95% CIs were reported using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model with Efron's method of tie handling with treatment as covariate stratified by ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1), geographic region of the enrolling site (East Asia vs. non-East Asia), and predominant tumor history (squamous vs. non-squamous) was used to estimate HR and 95% CIs for first course study treatment per protocol.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months (data cut-off date 01 Sep 2020)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 by BICR. In this study, RECIST 1.1 was modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. Per protocol the ORR was calculated using the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by ECOG performance status (0 versus 1), geographic region of the enrolling site (East Asia versus non-East Asia), and predominant tumor history (squamous versus non-squamous) for the first course of study treatment.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months (data cut-off date 01 Sep 2020)
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR (Disappearance of all target lesions) or confirmed PR (At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. RECIST 1.1 was modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. The DOR was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Per protocol, the DOR for all participants who experienced a CR or PR was presented for the first course of study treatment.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months (data cut-off date 01 Sep 2020)
TTD was defined as the time to the first onset of a 10-point or greater score deterioration from baseline in any one of the 3 symptoms (cough, pain in chest or shortness of breath), confirmed by a second adjacent 10-point or greater score deterioration from baseline. Cough was based on EORTC QLQ-LC13 question 1, pain in chest was based on EORTC QLQ-LC13 question 10, and shortness of breath was based on EORTC QLQ-C30 question 8. Per protocol, TTD was reported for first course study treatment.
Time frame: Up to approximately 27 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol specified procedure. Per protocol, the number of participants who experienced an AE were reported for the first course of study treatment and follow up.
Time frame: Up to approximately 24 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol specified procedure. Per protocol, the number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE were reported for the first course of study treatment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 18
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined score were presented for first course study treatment.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Pembrolizumab Plus Placebo in Previously Untreated, Stage IV, Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Subjects Whose Tumors Are PD-L1 Positive (TPS ≥ 50%) (KEYNOTE-598)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04165096
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04165083
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03396445
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03715205
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
View Trial Details