Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03765918

Study of Pembrolizumab Given Prior to Surgery and in Combination With Radiotherapy Given Post-surgery for Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-689)

This is a randomized, active-controlled, open-label study of pembrolizumab given prior to surgery and pembrolizumab in combination with standard of care radiotherapy (with or without cisplatin), as post-surgical therapy in treatment naïve participants with newly diagnosed Stage III/IVA, resectable, locoregionally advanced, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Efficacy outcomes will be stratified by programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) status. The primary hypothesis is that pembrolizumab given before surgery and after surgery in combination with radiotherapy (with or without cisplatin) improves event-free survival compared to radiotherapy (with or without cisplatin) given after surgery alone.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Conditions

Head and Neck Neoplasms Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Parkinson Disease 4, Autosomal Dominant Lewy Body

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Hospital Universitario Austral ( Site 0009), Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has histologically confirmed new diagnosis of resectable, non-metastatic, squamous cell carcinoma that is either: Stage III Human Papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal primary that is tumor size (T) 4, lymph node involvement (N) 0-2, no distant metastases (M0); Stage III or IVA oropharyngeal HPV negative; or Stage III or IVA larynx/hypopharynx/oral cavity primaries.
  • Is eligible for primary surgery based on investigator decision and per local practice
  • Female and male participants of reproductive potential must agree to use adequate contraception throughout the study period and for up to 180 days after the last dose of study therapy.
  • Male participants must refrain from donating sperm throughout the study period and for up to 180 days after the last dose of study therapy
  • Female participant that is not pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Has evaluable tumor burden (measurable and/or non-measurable tumor lesions) assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)
  • Has provided newly obtained core or excisional biopsy of a tumor lesion not previously irradiated
  • Has results from testing of HPV status for oropharyngeal cancer defined as p16
  • Has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 performed within 10 days of randomization

Exclusion criteria

  • Has Stage T4B and/or N3 locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) and/or distant metastases
  • Has cancer outside of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx or oral cavity. such as nasopharyngeal, sinus, other para-nasal, or other unknown primary head and neck cancer (HNC)
  • Female participant who has a positive urine pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to study start or within 24 hours prior to the start of radiotherapy with or without cisplatin.
  • Has received prior therapy with an anti-programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1), anti-programmed cell death receptor ligand 1(PD-L1), or anti-programmed cell death receptor ligand 2 (PD-L2) agent or with an agent directed to another co-inhibitory T-cell receptor
  • Has received prior radiotherapy treatment or systemic anti-cancer therapy including investigational agents for the HNC under study prior to study start
  • Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to randomization
  • Is currently participating in or has participated in a study of an investigational agent or has used an investigational device within 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving systemic steroid therapy (in dosing exceeding 10 mg daily of prednisone equivalent) or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to randomization
  • Has a known additional malignancy that is progressing or has required active treatment within the past 3 years with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ (e.g. in situ cervical cancer or breast carcinoma) that have undergone potentially curative therapy
  • Has radiographically detectable (even if asymptomatic and/or previously treated) central nervous system metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis
  • Has Grade ≥2 audiometric hearing loss
  • Has Grade ≥2 neuropathy
  • Has Grade 3-4 bleeding due to the underlying malignancy
  • Has received major surgery or has not recovered adequately from the toxicity and/or complications from the intervention prior to study start
  • Has had previous allogeneic tissue/solid organ transplant
  • Has severe hypersensitivity (≥Grade 3) to pembrolizumab and/or any of its excipients, radiotherapy, cisplatin or their analogs
  • Has an active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in past 2 years
  • Has a history of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or has current pneumonitis
  • Has an active infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Has a known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Has a known history of or is positive for Hepatitis B (defined as hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] reactive) or known active Hepatitis C (defined as Hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid is detected).
  • Has a history or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might confound the results of the study, interfere with the participant's participation for the full duration of the study, or is not in the best interest of the participant to participate, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Has a known psychiatric or substance abuse disorder that would interfere with the participant's ability to cooperate with the requirements of the study

Treatment and study plan

Pembrolizumab 200 mg

Biological

200 mg administered IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

Other names: KEYTRUDA®, MK-3475

Radiotherapy 60 Gray

Radiation

Low risk participants administered 2 Gray in 30 fractions. Administered using intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Radiotherapy 66 Gray

Radiation

High risk participants administered 2 Gray in 33 fractions. Administered using intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Radiotherapy 70 Gray

Radiation

Participants with gross residual disease administered 2 Gray in 35 fractions. Administered using intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Cisplatin 100 mg/m^2

Drug

100 mg/m^2 administered by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

Other names: Platinol®, Platinol-AQ®

Primary outcomes

  1. Event-free Survival (EFS)

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    EFS was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and was defined as the time from randomization to any of the following events: radiographic disease progression (RDP; participants who undergo a definitive biopsy of the progressed lesion and are found to have no histologic evidence of invasive cancer will not meet criteria for an event), RDP during the neoadjuvant phase that precluded surgery, local or distant disease progression or recurrence (as assessed with imaging or biopsy as indicated), or death due to any cause. A secondary malignancy was not considered an EFS event. Per protocol, RECIST 1.1 was modified to allow up to 10 target lesions total (up to 5 per organ). Per protocol, EFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR in all randomized participants was presented.

  2. EFS in Participants With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    EFS was based on RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR and was defined as the time from randomization to any of the following events: RDP (participants who undergo a definitive biopsy of the progressed lesion and are found to have no histologic evidence of invasive cancer will not meet criteria for an event), RDP during the neoadjuvant phase that precluded surgery, local or distant disease progression or recurrence (as assessed with imaging or biopsy as indicated), or death due to any cause. A secondary malignancy was not considered an EFS event. Per protocol, RECIST 1.1 was modified to allow up to 10 target lesions total (up to 5 per organ). Per protocol, EFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  3. EFS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    EFS was based on RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR and was defined as the time from randomization to any of the following events: RDP (participants who undergo a definitive biopsy of the progressed lesion and are found to have no histologic evidence of invasive cancer will not meet criteria for an event), RDP during the neoadjuvant phase that precluded surgery, local or distant disease progression or recurrence (as assessed with imaging or biopsy as indicated), or death due to any cause. A secondary malignancy was not considered an EFS event. Per protocol, RECIST 1.1 was modified to allow up to 10 target lesions total (up to 5 per organ). Per protocol, EFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Major Pathological Response (mPR) Rate

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by blinded independent pathologist review (BIPR) at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants was presented.

  2. mPR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  3. mPR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    mPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having ≤10% invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. Per protocol, mPR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  4. Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants was presented.

  5. pCR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  6. pCR Rate in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1

    Time frame: Up to ~66 months

    pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants having no residual invasive squamous cell carcinoma within the resected primary tumor specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes. The pCR rate as assessed by BIPR at the time of definitive surgery in all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  7. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL) (Items 29 & 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  8. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  9. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  10. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  11. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  12. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  13. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  14. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  15. Adjuvant Treatment: Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  16. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  17. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  18. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (Items 29 and 30) Scale Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) were computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  19. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  20. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  21. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  22. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  23. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  24. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  25. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  26. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  27. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  28. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  29. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  30. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  31. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-Head and Neck Module 35 [H&N35] (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  32. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  33. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  34. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  35. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  36. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  37. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  38. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  39. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  40. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  41. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  42. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 35-38) Swallowing Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 swallowing symptoms (Items 35-38) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  43. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  44. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  45. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  46. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  47. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  48. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  49. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  50. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  51. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  52. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  53. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  54. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 46, 53-54) Speech Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 46, 53-54) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 speech symptoms (Items 46, 53-54) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  55. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  56. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  57. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  58. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  59. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  60. Neoadjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 6

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm was presented.

  61. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  62. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  63. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 25

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 25

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  64. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants was presented.

  65. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  66. Adjuvant Treatment: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (Items 31-34) Pain Combined Score in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 at Week 51

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 51

    EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a 35-item questionnaire to assess QoL of head and neck cancer participants and consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicated more problems. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain symptoms (Items 31-34) combined score for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  67. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Up to ~92 months

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS for all randomized participants was presented.

  68. OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10

    Time frame: Up to ~92 months

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 was presented.

  69. OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1

    Time frame: Up to ~92 months

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS for all randomized participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was presented.

  70. Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

    Time frame: Up to ~92 months

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated). The number of participants who experienced one or more AEs was reported.

  71. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

    Time frame: Up to ~92 months

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated). The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy and in Combination With Standard of Care as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III-IVA Resectable Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LA HNSCC)

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.