Olaparib
Drug300 mg (2x 150 mg tablets) twice daily
Other names: Lynparza
NCT Number: NCT02987543
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib versus enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate in subjects with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have failed prior treatment with a new hormonal agent and have homologous recombination repair gene mutations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–130 year
Male
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, Buenos Aires, Argentina
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of olaparib versus enzalutamide or abiraterone in subjects with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have failed prior treatment with a new hormonal agent (NHA) and have a qualifying tumor mutation in one of 15 genes involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Subjects will be divided into two cohorts based on HRR gene mutation status.
Approximately 340 subjects will be randomized 2:1 (olaparib : investigator choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate) into the trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
300 mg (2x 150 mg tablets) twice daily
Other names: Lynparza
160 mg (4 x 40 mg capsules) once daily
Other names: XTANDI
1,000 mg (4 x 250 mg tablets) once daily
Other names: ZYTIGA
Time frame: Tumor assessments every 8 weeks from randomisation until radiographic progression assessed by BICR (median duration of treatment of 7 and 4 months for Olaparib and Investigators Choice of NHA respectively).
The time from randomisation until the date of objective radiological disease progression (determined by RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG-3) (bone)) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomised therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression is defined using (i) Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for soft tissue, as a >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of >=5mm taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since treatment started including the baseline sum of diameters; (ii) Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PGWG-3) for bone as >= 2 new bone lesions on the 1st week 8 scan compared to baseline. The confirmatory scan, >=6 weeks later, must show >=2 more new bone lesions (for a total of >=4 new bone lesions since baseline).
Time frame: Tumor assessments every 8 weeks from randomisation until radiographic progression assessed by BICR (median duration of treatment of 7 and 4 months for Olaparib and Investigators Choice of NHA respectively).
ORR is the percentage of patients with at least one visit response of Complete response (CR) or Partial response (PR), in their soft tissue disease assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), in the absence of progression on bone scan assessed by Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3)). Per RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all target lesions; PR = >=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions; For each treatment group, ORR is the number of patients with a CR and PR.
Time frame: Tumor assessments every 8 weeks from randomisation until radiographic progression assessed by BICR (median duration of treatment of 7 and 4 months for Olaparib and Investigators Choice of NHA respectively).
The time from randomisation until the date of objective radiological disease progression (by RECIST 1.1 and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PGWG-3)) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomised therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks from randomisation (for 7 consecutive days) throughout the study (median duration of treatment of 7 and 4 months for Olaparib and Investigators Choice of NHA respectively).
Time from randomisation to time point at which worsening in pain is observed (ie date of pain progression - date of randomisation + 1). Based on average Brief Pain Inventory - short form (BPI-SF) worst pain [Item 3] and Analgesic Quantification Algorithm [AQA] score.
Time frame: Approximately 35 months after the first patient was randomised.
Number of Participants with Overall Survival (OS) - Cohort A only.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib (Lynparza™) Versus Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Treatment With a New Hormonal Agent and Have Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Mutations (PROfound)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04751929
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05005728
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06104449
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT02044354
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Villejuif, Val de Marne, France
View Trial Details