NCT Number: NCT01721772
Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) Compared With Dacarbazine in Untreated, Unresectable, or Metastatic Melanoma
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical benefit, as measured by overall survival, of nivolumab with that of. dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic melanoma
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
Fundacion Cidea, Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, Argentina
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com
Inclusion criteria
- Men and women ≥18 years of age
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1
- Untreated and histologically confirmed unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma, as per the staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer
- Measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1
- Tumor tissue from an unresectable or metastatic site of disease must be provided for biomarker analyses
- Known BRAF wild-type, as per regionally acceptable V600 mutational status testing. BRAF mutant patients and those with indeterminate or unknown BRAF status are not permitted to randomize
Exclusion criteria
- Active brain metastases or leptomeningeal metastases
- Ocular melanoma
- Any active, known, or suspected autoimmune disease
Treatment and study plan
Placebo matching BMS-936558 (Nivolumab)
BiologicalDacarbazine
DrugPlacebo matching Dacarbazine
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death. For those without documentation of death, to the last date the participant was known to be alive, assessed up to 17 months.
OS is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive.
-
Overall Survival (OS) Rate
Time frame: From randomization to 6 months and or to 12 months
OS rate is calculated as the percentage of participants alive at the indicated timepoints
Secondary outcomes
-
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From date of randomization up to date of disease progression or death, up to approximately 84 months
Investigator-assessed PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented progression, as determined by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Patients who died without progressing were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Those who did not progress or die were documented on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Patients who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were documented on their date of randomization. Those who started any subsequent anticancer therapy without a prior reported progression were documented on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment prior to initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy.
-
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate
Time frame: From randomization to the specified timepoints, up to 84 months
The PFS rate at a time point is the estimated percentage of patients who have not progressed and are alive at that time point following randomization and is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methodology.
-
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Tumor assessments beginning at 9 weeks following randomization and continuing every 6 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death, assessed to 94 months
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) defined complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). RECIST, volume 1.1 for target lesions: CR=disappearance of all target lesions; PR=at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimension (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; stable disease=neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started; PD=at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, and the sum LD must have an absolute increase of ≥5 mm.
-
Overall Survival by Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of disease progression or death, up to approximately 94 months
Overall Survival is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive. PD-L1 expression level is defined as the percent of tumor cells demonstrating plasma membrane PD-L1-staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per a Dako PD-L1 IHC (immunohistochemistry) assay (referred to as quantifiable PD-L1 expression). Assessment of OS by PD-L1 expression as measured by a validated assay and comparing OS in patients with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥5% (PD-L1 positive) versus patients with tumor PD-L1 expression <5% (PD-L1 negative). Tumor tissue samples for PD-L1 testing were collected at screening from metastatic or unresectable sites prior to randomization.
-
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Scores
Time frame: At baseline and every 6 weeks for 12 months and at follow-up visits 1 and 2, assessed up to 93 months
HRQoL is evaluated by mean changes from baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status/quality of life composite scale in all randomized patients. The QLQ-30 is a cancer-specific, self-administered questionnaire that contains 30 questions, covering global, functional, and symptom scales. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores on global and functional scales indicate better quality of life (QoL), while higher scores on the symptom scales indicate declining QoL.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of BMS-936558 vs Dacarbazine in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
Acronym: CheckMate 066
Important dates
- Study start
- 2013
- Primary completion
- 2014
- Study completion
- 2021
- First posted
- Nov 6, 2012
- Registry last updated
- Jul 12, 2022
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Study of HBI-8000 With Nivolumab in Melanoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02718066
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsA Study of Recombinant Vaccinia Virus to Treat Malignant Melanoma
NCT00429312
Melanoma, Neoplasms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsValidation of ICG-99mTc-nanoscan as Hybrid Tracer for Sentinel Node Biopsy
NCT06666634
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsSelection Pressure and Evolution Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Other Immunologic Therapies
NCT02724488
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
View Trial Details