Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03038022

Study of MGL-3196 in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)

The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of once-daily oral MGL-3196 on the percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in participants with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Madrigal Research Site, Aalborg, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be willing to participate in the study and provide written informed consent;
  • Male and female adults ≥18 years of age;
  • Female participants of child bearing potential with negative serum pregnancy (beta human chorionic gonadotropin) test who are not breastfeeding, do not plan to become pregnant during the study, and agree to use effective birth control per locally agreed requirements; male participants who have sexual intercourse with a female partner of child bearing potential from the first dose of study drug until 1 month after study completion must either be surgically sterile (confirmed by documented azoospermia >90 days after the procedure) or agree to use a condom with spermicide. All male participants must agree not to donate sperm from the first dose of study drug until 1 month after study completion;
  • Must have a diagnosis of HeFH by genetic testing or by having met the diagnostic criteria for definite familial hypercholesterolemia outlined by the Simon Broome Register Group or World Health Organization/Dutch Lipid Network (score >8);
  • Must have had a fasting LDL-C (low density lipoprotein cholesterol) ≥2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL); and
  • Must be on a stable or maximally tolerated dose (≥4 weeks prior to screening) of an approved statin (rosuvastatin ≤40 mg daily, atorvastatin ≤80 mg daily), with or without ezetimibe. Patients intolerant to statins were allowed.

Exclusion criteria

  • Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia
  • LDL or plasma apheresis within 2 months prior to randomization;
  • New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, or known left ventricular ejection fraction <30%;
  • Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, including confirmed QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula >450 msec for males and >470 msec for females at the screening electrocardiogram assessment;
  • Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, or stroke within 3 months prior to randomization;
  • Type 1 diabetes, or newly diagnosed or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c >8%);
  • History of significant alcohol consumption for a period of more than 3 consecutive months within 1 year prior to screening; Note: Significant alcohol consumption is defined as average of >20 g/day in female participants and >30 g/day in male participants;
  • Hyperthyroidism;
  • Thyroid replacement therapy;
  • Hypothyroidism;
  • Evidence of chronic liver disease;
  • Hepatitis B, as defined by the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen;
  • Hepatitis C, as defined by the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (anti-HCV) and HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA). Participants with positive anti-HCV who test negative for HCV RNA at screening will be allowed to participate in the study;
  • Serum alanine aminotransferase >1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (one repeat allowed);
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min;
  • Creatine kinase >3 x ULN (one repeat allowed);
  • History of biliary diversion;
  • Positive for human immunodeficiency virus infection;
  • History of malignant hypertension;
  • Systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg at screening or randomization and confirmed at an unscheduled visit;
  • Triglycerides >5.7 mmol/L (500 mg/dL) at screening and confirmed by repeat assessment;
  • Active, serious medical disease with likely life expectancy <2 years;
  • Active substance abuse, including inhaled or injection drugs within the year prior to screening;
  • Participation in an investigational new drug trial within the 30 days prior to randomization; or
  • Any other condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would impede compliance, hinder completion of the study, or compromise the well-being of the participants.

Treatment and study plan

MGL-3196 (resmetirom)

Drug

Oral

Placebo

Drug

Oral

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline To Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    LDL-C was determined by ultracentrifugation or direct measure. Least-squares (LS) mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 of Free Thyroxine (T4)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    T4 was assessed at each study visit.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 of Free Triiodothyronine (T3)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    Free T3 was assessed at each study visit.

  3. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 of Thyrotropin (TSH)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    TSH was assessed at each study visit.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 of Thyroxine Binding Globulin (TBG)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    TBG was assessed at all study visits except the Screening Visit.

  5. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 12 of Reverse Triiodothyronine (T3)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    Reverse T3 was assessed at each study visit.

  6. Mean Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    Non-HDL-C were determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor

  7. Mean Percent Change In Triglycerides From Baseline To Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    Triglycerides were determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  8. Mean Percent Change In Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline To Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    Lp(a) was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  9. Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII From Baseline to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    Apolipoprotein CIII was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  10. Mean Percent Change In Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) From Baseline To Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    ApoB was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  11. Mean Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoB/ApoA1) Ratio From Baseline to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  12. Mean Percent Change In Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio From Baseline to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  13. Absolute Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    LDL-C was determined by ultracentrifugation or direct measure . Least-squares (LS) mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  14. Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 2 and Week 4 in Patients in the 100 mg and the 60 mg Groups

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4

    LDL-C was determined by ultracentrifugation or direct measure. Least-squares (LS) mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.

  15. Percent Change in LDL-C From Baseline to Week 12 by Systemic Exposure Category

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    The effect on percent change in LDL-C from baseline to Week 12 was determined by patient exposure category (higher/lower). Patients taking MGL-3196 were categorized into lower and higher exposure groups. Patients in the higher exposure group must either have had estimated Week 2 AUC ≥5,000 mg∙h/L, or if Week 2 AUC <5,000 mg∙h/L but Week 4 pre-dose concentration >1.5 ng/mL (if on 60 mg MGL-3196). All other patients were in the lower exposure group.

  16. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: Total LDL Particles

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for LDL Particles.

  17. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: Small LDL Particles

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Small LDL Particles.

  18. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: Intermediate LDL Particles

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Intermediate LDL Particles.

  19. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: Large LDL Particles

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Large LDL Particles.

  20. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12:Total Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) and Chylomicron Particles

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for VLDL and Chylomicron Particles.

  21. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: Total HDL Particles

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Total HDL Particles.

  22. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: LDL Particle Size

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for LDL Particle size.

  23. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: VLDL Particle Size

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for VLDL Particle Size.

  24. Mean Change in Lipid Particle Concentration From Baseline To Week 12: HDL Particle Size

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

    The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for HDL Particle Size.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of MGL-3196 in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jan 31, 2017
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.