MGL-3196 (resmetirom)
DrugOral
NCT Number: NCT03038022
The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of once-daily oral MGL-3196 on the percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in participants with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Madrigal Research Site, Aalborg, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral
Oral
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
LDL-C was determined by ultracentrifugation or direct measure. Least-squares (LS) mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
T4 was assessed at each study visit.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Free T3 was assessed at each study visit.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
TSH was assessed at each study visit.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
TBG was assessed at all study visits except the Screening Visit.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Reverse T3 was assessed at each study visit.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Non-HDL-C were determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Triglycerides were determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Lp(a) was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Apolipoprotein CIII was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
ApoB was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The Cholesterol/HDL-C Ratio was determined by ultracentrifugation. LS mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
LDL-C was determined by ultracentrifugation or direct measure . Least-squares (LS) mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
LDL-C was determined by ultracentrifugation or direct measure. Least-squares (LS) mean was provided for the comparison of MGL-3196 versus placebo and it used a linear model with percent change from baseline as the dependent variable and treatment as a factor.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
The effect on percent change in LDL-C from baseline to Week 12 was determined by patient exposure category (higher/lower). Patients taking MGL-3196 were categorized into lower and higher exposure groups. Patients in the higher exposure group must either have had estimated Week 2 AUC ≥5,000 mg∙h/L, or if Week 2 AUC <5,000 mg∙h/L but Week 4 pre-dose concentration >1.5 ng/mL (if on 60 mg MGL-3196). All other patients were in the lower exposure group.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for LDL Particles.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Small LDL Particles.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Intermediate LDL Particles.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Large LDL Particles.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for VLDL and Chylomicron Particles.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for Total HDL Particles.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for LDL Particle size.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for VLDL Particle Size.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The effect of once-daily oral dosing of MGL-3196 versus placebo for 12 weeks in terms of change from baseline was assessed for HDL Particle Size.
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Industry
A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of MGL-3196 in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05398029
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Auckland, New Zealand
View Trial DetailsNCT04666298
Dyslipidemias, Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT02460159
Dyslipidemias, Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
View Trial DetailsNCT05325203
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details